Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

DeepDyve requires Javascript to function. Please enable Javascript on your browser to continue.

How Philosophers Argue

Part of the Argumentation Library Book Series (volume 41)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6

ISBN: 978-3-030-85367-9

Publisher: Springer International Publishing - Springer Journals

Feb 21, 2022

LitStream

Counterarguments

Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert

Pages: 311 –329

[The concept of counterargument lies at the heart of argument dialectics. The importance attached to the relations between arguments ―especially those of opposition— establishes a clear distinction between argument dialectics and logic, whether formal or informal. My first aim in this chapter is...
LitStream

Co-Oriented Reasons and Modifiers

Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert

Pages: 331 –345

[‘Co-oriented reasons’ are reasons that can be adduced to support the same claim, and ‘co-orientation’ is an operation combining two arguments with a common conclusion. Co-orientation connectors include ‘also’, ‘even’, ‘on the one hand’, ‘on the other hand’, among others. There are two main forms...
LitStream

Intertwined Structures

Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert

Pages: 347 –359

[Argumentative structures are photographs of argumentative processes that capture the macro-arguments that participants construct interactively in the course of the argumentative exchange. We might say, then, that argumentative structures are the static counterpart of the dynamic dialectical...
LitStream

An Argument Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate

Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert

Pages: 361 –435

[I will present an argument dialectical analysis of the Russell-Copleston debate. As explained in chap. 9 this will be a logical analysis. Hence, I will focus neither on the series of actions performed by Russell and Copleston during the debate nor on the procedure followed by them in doing so,...
LitStream

Final Cross-Examination

Leal, Fernando; Marraud, Hubert

Pages: 437 –453

[The present book closes with an exercise of cross-examination in which each one of the authors comments on the kind of analysis done by the other author. This is at the same time an occasion for the reader to compare one theory of the argumentative process (the pragma-dialectics of the Amsterdam...

results per page

Prev
1
2
Next

Browse All eBooks