Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The study presented in this book examines the effects of preschool education on the development of children living in an orphanage. This chapter compares the motor achievements of children who attended preschool and those who did not. Preschool and control children were tested on the McCaskill series of motor achievements in June 1936, after the preschool had been in session twenty months, and were retested in March 1937. The achievements tested were methods of ascending and descending short and long nights of steps; ascending and descending a ladder with rungs six inches apart and a ladder with rungs twelve inches apart; jumping from boxes 8, 12, 18, and 28 inches in height; hopping on one foot, hopping on both feet, skipping, walking on a straight path, and walking on a circular path. The preschool children (thirty-eight cases) made a motor achievements score 5.3 points superior to the control group (forty cases). There was unevenness of development in the various motor accomplishments measured in this study. The rate of development of a skill appeared to be related to opportunities for its practice. The skills in which the preschool children excelled the control children were those in which they had an obvious advantage in opportunity. The most significant differences occurred on methods of ascending and descending ladders, to which the preschool children had access but the control children did not. The second most pronounced difference occurred on methods of ascending and descending steps. The preschool children had considerably more opportunity to practice this performance than the control children. In methods of jumping off boxes, and in hopping, skipping, and balanced walking the preschool children were not superior to the control children. Among the preschool equipment were packing boxes and a set of boxes of different heights. Control children did not have boxes, but on the sunporch there was a window seat from which they jumped. Occasionally also they jumped from the table or crawled through the windows leading from the sunporch to the cottage room. Opportunities for hopping and skipping were equivalent in the two groups so far as is known. A small amount of training was given as a part of the preschool program, but the control children may also have received some instruction from older children. The preschool children progressed faster than the control children. Judged by the performance of Iowa City children they were approaching normal development and improving in all types of performances, while the control children who remained in the orphanage for a long stretch of time were showing marked retardation and failure to progress sufficiently to maintain their initial age-motor age ratio. The differences in progress of the two groups appeared to be due to the better environment and opportunities offered by the preschool. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
Published: Dec 12, 2011
Keywords: children; preschool education; motor achievements; development; environment; orphanage
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.