Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Secondary control as a heterogeneous category

Secondary control as a heterogeneous category Comments on the discussion by J. R. Weisz et al of the distinction between the primary form of control, which is characteristic of Americans and emphasizes influence over existing realities, and the secondary form of control, which is characteristic of the Japanese and emphasizes accommodation. The present author discusses the primary–secondary locus of control dichotomy and the role of yielding as a method of interpretive secondary control. (3 ref) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Psychologist American Psychological Association

Secondary control as a heterogeneous category

American Psychologist , Volume 39 (9): 2 – Sep 1, 1984

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/secondary-control-as-a-heterogeneous-category-tVMB0msnOq

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0003-066x
eISSN
1935-990X
DOI
10.1037/0003-066X.39.9.970
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Comments on the discussion by J. R. Weisz et al of the distinction between the primary form of control, which is characteristic of Americans and emphasizes influence over existing realities, and the secondary form of control, which is characteristic of the Japanese and emphasizes accommodation. The present author discusses the primary–secondary locus of control dichotomy and the role of yielding as a method of interpretive secondary control. (3 ref)

Journal

American PsychologistAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Sep 1, 1984

There are no references for this article.