Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic

VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic Substantial strides have been made in the field of violence risk assessment. Numerous robust risk factors have been identified and incorporated into structured violence risk assessment instruments. The concepts of violence prevention, management, and treatment have been infused into contemporary thinking on risk assessment. This conceptual development underscores the necessity of identifying, measuring, and monitoring changeable (dynamic) risk factors—the most promising targets for risk reduction efforts. However, empirical investigation of dynamic risk is virtually absent from the literature. In this article, the authors (a) differentiate risk status (interindividual risk level based largely on static risk factors) from risk state (intraindividual risk level determined largely by current status on dynamic risk factors), (b) analyze the relevance of contemporary risk assessment measures for capturing dynamic risk, and (c) distill potentially important dynamic risk factors from the literature in order to facilitate future research. Suggestions for theory development and research design are provided. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychology, Public Policy, and Law American Psychological Association

VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/violence-risk-assessment-getting-specific-about-being-dynamic-0Grr2opwjH

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 American Psychological Association
ISSN
1076-8971
eISSN
1939-1528
DOI
10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.347
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Substantial strides have been made in the field of violence risk assessment. Numerous robust risk factors have been identified and incorporated into structured violence risk assessment instruments. The concepts of violence prevention, management, and treatment have been infused into contemporary thinking on risk assessment. This conceptual development underscores the necessity of identifying, measuring, and monitoring changeable (dynamic) risk factors—the most promising targets for risk reduction efforts. However, empirical investigation of dynamic risk is virtually absent from the literature. In this article, the authors (a) differentiate risk status (interindividual risk level based largely on static risk factors) from risk state (intraindividual risk level determined largely by current status on dynamic risk factors), (b) analyze the relevance of contemporary risk assessment measures for capturing dynamic risk, and (c) distill potentially important dynamic risk factors from the literature in order to facilitate future research. Suggestions for theory development and research design are provided.

Journal

Psychology, Public Policy, and LawAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Sep 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.