Access the full text.
Sign up today, get an introductory month for just $19.
S. Parker, M. Mewes, F. Baynes, M. Tobar (2015)
Bounds on higher-order Lorentz-violating photon sector coefficients from an asymmetric optical ring resonator experimentPhysics Letters A, 379
A. Gomes, A. Kostelecký, Arnaldo Vargas (2014)
Laboratory tests of Lorentz and CPT symmetry with muonsPhysical Review D, 90
D. Johannsmann (2015)
The Quartz Crystal Microbalance in Soft Matter Research
M. Nagel, S. Parker, E. Kovalchuk, P. Stanwix, J. Hartnett, E. Ivanov, A. Peters, M. Tobar (2014)
Direct terrestrial test of Lorentz symmetry in electrodynamics to 10−18Nature Communications, 6
A. Kostelecký, N. Russell (2008)
Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT ViolationReviews of Modern Physics, 83
M. Goryachev, D. Creedon, S. Galliou, M. Tobar (2013)
Observation of Rayleigh phonon scattering through excitation of extremely high overtones in low-loss cryogenic acoustic cavities for hybrid quantum systems.Physical review letters, 111 8
S. Herrmann, S. Herrmann, A. Senger, K. Möhle, M. Nagel, Evgeny Kovalchuk, A. Peters (2009)
Rotating optical cavity experiment testing Lorentz invariance at the 10-17 levelPhysical Review D, 80
M. Mewes (2012)
Optical-cavity tests of higher-order Lorentz violationPhysical Review D, 85
A. Kostelecký, J. Tasson (2010)
Matter-gravity couplings and Lorentz violationPhysical Review D, 83
A. Lo, P. Haslinger, E. Mizrachi, L. Anderegg, H. Mȕller, M. Hohensee, M. Goryachev, M. Tobar (2014)
Acoustic tests of Lorentz symmetry using quartz oscillatorsarXiv: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
R. Filler (1987)
The acceleration sensitivity of quartz crystal oscillators: a reviewIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 35
P. Wolf, S. Bize, A. Clairon, A. Luiten, G. Santarelli, M. Tobar (2002)
Tests of Lorentz invariance using a microwave resonator: an updateIEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition Jointly with the 17th European Frequency and Time Forum, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003
P. Salzenstein, A. Kuna, L. Sojdr, J. Chauvin (2010)
Significant step in ultra-high stability quartz crystal oscillatorsElectronics Letters, 46
T. Pruttivarasin, M. Ramm, S. Porsev, S. Porsev, I. Tupitsyn, M. Safronova, M. Safronova, M. Hohensee, M. Hohensee, Hartmut Häffner (2014)
Michelson–Morley analogue for electrons using trapped ions to test Lorentz symmetryNature, 517
P. Wolf, F. Chapelet, S. Bize, A. Clairon (2006)
Cold atom clock test of Lorentz invariance in the matter sector.Physical review letters, 96 6
A. Kostelecký, M. Mewes (2002)
Signals for Lorentz violation in electrodynamicsPhysical Review D, 66
J. Brown, S. Smullin, T. Kornack, M. Romalis (2010)
New limit on Lorentz- and CPT-violating neutron spin interactions.Physical review letters, 105 15
M. Hohensee, P. Stanwix, M. Tobar, S. Parker, D. Phillips, R. Walsworth (2010)
Improved Constraints on Isotropic Shift and Anisotropies of the Speed of Light Using Rotating Cryogenic Sapphire OscillatorsPhysical Review D, 82
H. Müller, P. Stanwix, M. Tobar, E. Ivanov, P. Wolf, S. Herrmann, A. Senger, E. Kovalchuk, A. Peters (2007)
Tests of relativity by complementary rotating Michelson-Morley experiments.Physical review letters, 99 5
S. Coleman, S. Glashow (1998)
High-energy tests of Lorentz invariancePhysical Review D, 59
B. Altschul (2008)
Limits on neutron Lorentz violation from the stability of primary cosmic ray protonsPhysical Review D, 78
M. Goryachev, S. Galliou, P. Abbé, P. Bourgeois, S. Grop, B. Dubois (2012)
Quartz resonator instabilities under cryogenic conditionsIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 59
Y. Michimura, M. Mewes, N. Matsumoto, Y. Aso, M. Ando (2013)
Optical-Cavity Limits on Higher-Order Lorentz Violation
S. Galliou, M. Goryachev, R. Bourquin, P. Abbé, J. Aubry, M. Tobar (2013)
Extremely Low Loss Phonon-Trapping Cryogenic Acoustic Cavities for Future Physical ExperimentsScientific Reports, 3
Bear, Stoner, Walsworth, Kostelecký, Lane (2000)
Limit on lorentz and CPT violation of the neutron using a two-species noble-Gas maserPhysical review letters, 85 24
R. Beeson, J. Gagnepain, D. Janiaud, M. Valdois (1979)
Design of a Bulk Wave Resonator Insensitive to Acceleration
M. Tobar, P. Stanwix, J. McFerran, J. Gu'ena, M. Abgrall, S. Bize, A. Clairon, P. Laurent, P. Rosenbusch, D. Rovera, G. Santarelli (2013)
Testing local position and fundamental constant invariance due to periodic gravitational and boost using long-term comparison of the SYRTE atomic fountains and H-masersPhysical Review D, 87
J. Guéna, P. Rosenbusch, Philippe Laurent, M. Abgrall, D. Rovera, Giorgio Santarelli, M. Tobar, Sébastien Bize, André Clairon (2010)
Demonstration of a dual alkali Rb/Cs fountain clockIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 57
M. Goryachev, S. Galliou, J. Imbaud, P. Abb'e (2013)
Advances in development of quartz crystal oscillators at liquid helium temperaturesCryogenics, 57
P. Stanwix, M. Tobar, P. Wolf, C. Locke, E. Ivanov (2006)
Improved test of Lorentz invariance in electrodynamics using rotating cryogenic sapphire oscillatorsPhysical Review D, 74
P. Wolf, M. Tobar, S. Bize, A. Clairon, A. Luiten, G. Santarelli (2004)
Improved test of Lorentz invariance in electrodynamicsPhysical Review D, 70
E. Ivanov, M. Tobar, R. Woode (1998)
Microwave interferometry: application to precision measurements and noise reduction techniquesIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 45
D. Colladay, A. Kostelecký (1997)
$CPT$ violation and the standard modelPhysical Review D, 55
M. Tobar, P. Wolf, S. Bize, G. Santarelli, V. Flambaum (2009)
Testing local Lorentz and position invariance and variation of fundamental constants by searching the derivative of the comparison frequency between a cryogenic sapphire oscillator and hydrogen maserPhysical Review D, 81
S. Parker, M. Mewes, P. Stanwix, M. Tobar (2011)
Cavity bounds on higher-order lorentz-violating coefficients.Physical review letters, 106 18
R. Kennedy, E. Thorndike (1932)
Experimental Establishment of the Relativity of TimePhysical Review, 42
J. Grasselli (1987)
“On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether”Applied Spectroscopy, 41
H. Bars, C. Guerlin, R. Lasseri, J. Ebran, Quentin Bailey, S. Bize, E. Khan, P. Wolf (2016)
Lorentz-symmetry test at Planck-scale suppression with nucleons in a spin-polarized $^{133}$Cs cold atom clockPhysical Review D, 95
P. Stanwix, M. Tobar, P. Wolf, M. Susli, C. Locke, E. Ivanov, J. Winterflood, F. Kann (2005)
Test of Lorentz invariance in electrodynamics using rotating cryogenic sapphire microwave oscillators.Physical review letters, 95 4
C. Eisele, A. Nevsky, S. Schiller (2009)
A laboratory test of the isotropy of light propagation at the 10−17 levelCLEO/Europe - EQEC 2009 - European Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and the European Quantum Electronics Conference
M. Tobar, E. Ivanov, P. Stanwix, J. Floch, J. Hartnett (2009)
Rotating odd-parity Lorentz invariance test in electrodynamicsPhysical Review D, 80
M. Abgrall, J. Guéna, Michel Lours, Giorgio Santarelli, M. Tobar, Sébastien Bize, S. Grop, B. Dubois, C. Fluhr, V. Giordano (2016)
High-Stability Comparison of Atomic Fountains Using Two Different Cryogenic OscillatorsIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 63
J. Vig, Thrygve Meeker (1991)
The aging of bulk acoustic wave resonators, filters and oscillatorsProceedings of the 45th Annual Symposium on Frequency Control 1991
A. Kostelecký, C. Lane (1999)
Constraints on Lorentz violation from clock-comparison experimentsPhysical Review D, 60
Next Generation of Phonon Tests of Lorentz Invariance using Quartz BAW Resonators Maxim Goryachev, Zeyu Kuang, Eugene N. Ivanov, Philipp Haslinger, Holger Muller, Michael E. Tobar Abstract—We demonstrate technological improvements in from colliders) are implemented to be sensitive to a particular phonon sector tests of Lorentz Invariance that implement quartz property in a particular sector. In this work, we perform Bulk Acoustic Wave oscillators. In this experiment, room temper- precision measurements of oscillating masses of particles ature oscillators with state-of-the-art phase noise are continuously (or phonons), which constitute normal matter, i.e. electrons, compared on a platform that rotates at a rate of order a cycle protons and neutrons[20]. per second. The discussion is focused on improvements in noise measurement techniques, data acquisition and data processing. The experiment described in this work is based on precision Preliminary results of the second generation of such tests are measurements of ultra-stable Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) given, and indicate that SME coefﬁcients in the matter sector quartz oscillators. Although, frequency stability of these os- can be measured at a precision of order 10 GeV after taking cillators is surpassed by other frequency standards, i.e. atomic a years worth of data. This is equivalent to an improvement of clocks, it is often that case that the sensitivity is limited by two orders of magnitude over the prior acoustic phonon sector experiment. systematic effects and ability to maintain the experiment for very long times rather by intrinsic stability of the used sources. Thus, quartz oscillators, whose systematics have been studied I. INTRODUCTION for a few decades, make a very well understood, reliable and OWADAYS, the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics robust platform for this kind of measurements. is a widely accepted fundamental theory that classiﬁes known elementary particle and forces. Despite its tremendous II. P HYSICAL PRINCIPLES AND PREVIOUS EXPERIM ENTS success in predicting and explaining relations between them, it leaves a signiﬁcant amount of unanswered questions partly due The resonant frequency of mechanical resonators and BAW to its incompatibility with General Relativity (GR). It is widely devices depend directly on the mode effective mass, and are believed that the discovery of new physics beyond the SM and thus widely utilised as precision mass sensors in many engi- GR will help solve this problem. Local Lorentz invariance is neering, chemical and medical applications[21]. In principle, a cornerstone of both SM and GR and one established way the resonant frequency depends not only on external loadings to look beyond these theories is to search of local Lorentz but also on variation of its intrinsic mass and thus on the in- Invariance Violations (LIV). Test models that include such ertial masses of composing particles. So, by modulating these violations can be used to predict signals from a wide range masses, one modulates phonon mode frequencies that can be of precision experiments, by far the most comprehensive is measured using precision frequency measurement techniques. known as the Standard Model Extension (SME) proposed by For putative LIV in the matter sector of the SME, modulations Kosteleky and co-workers[1], [2]. This extension includes SM of the internal masses of elementary particles are predicted to and GR along with all possible terms that can violate Lorentz depend on the direction and boost velocity in space. Thus, symmetry, i.e. by introducing anisotropies into different sectors the idea of the LIV test for ordinary matter particles in the of the SM and GR. The most well known of such anisotropies ’phonon sector’ reduces to measurements of frequency stability is the anisotropy of the speed of light widely investigated of mechanical resonators as a function of direction and boost experimentally for more than a century[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], in space, relative to some ﬁxed reference frame. [8], [9], [10], [11]. Besides the theoretical description of the The phonon sector Lorentz invariance test setup is built LIV terms, SME constitutes a framework allowing experimen- around two frequency sources based on mechanical resonators. talists to put bounds on various coefﬁcients, which describe Ideally, the displacement vectors for both resonators should the Lorentz violating terms[12], [13], [14], [15], [10], [16], be orthogonal comparing internal masses of particles in two [17], [18]. The coefﬁcients are grouped into four fundamental directions. As the setup rotates in space, e.g. with the rotating sectors dealing with light (photons), matter (electrons, protons, Earth, the difference between the two frequencies is modulated neutrons etc), neutrinos and gravity[19]. Usually experiments as proposed by the SME. Thus, by measuring the frequency or the analysis of pre-existing data (i.e. astrophysical or data stability of the pair the experiment is sensitive to the hypothet- ical SME LIV coefﬁcients. Implementing this approach, the Maxim Goryachev, Eugene N. Ivanov, Michael E. Tobar are with ARC overall sensitivity is limited by the oscillator or resonator fre- Centre of Excellence for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009, quency ﬂuctuations at time periods of order twice the rotation Australia. Zeyu Kuang is with Nanjing University, 22 Hankou Road, Gulou period, as well as all kinds of systematics associated with the District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210093. Philipp Haslinger and Holger rotation. Rotating the experiment effectively chops the signal, Muller are with Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, US so long-term performance of the oscillators does not inﬂuence Copyright c 2017 IEEE. arXiv:1804.02615v1 [physics.ins-det] 8 Apr 2018 2 the measurements even when taking measurements for longer onto and from the rotating setup. In the current experiment than one year. Since mechanical oscillators demonstrate the these connections are organised as follows: both oscillators are best frequency stability at relatively low integration times (less placed on the rotating table, generated signals are processed than a day), to achieve the best sensitivity, the oscillators have via Phased Locked Loop (PLL) and an interferometer[26] on to be rotated on a turntable with a frequency corresponding the turntable, only DC supply voltages to bias oscillators and to the integration time of order of the best stability. For this ampliﬁers are supplied through the rotating connector, gener- experiment this period is on the order of a second. This ated error signals are digitized on the table and transmitted method has been used in the ﬁrst generation of the phonon to a stationary computer via a Wi-Fi module, the stationary sector LIV tests[20]. Among all frequency sources based on computer controls the rotation, collects data from the digitizer mechanical motion, quartz BAW oscillators provide the best and the rotation encoder. The overall system architecture is frequency stability reaching below 10 between 1 and 10 illustrated in Fig. 1. seconds of integration time[22] and low sensitivity to external The system is designed to maximally separate analogue and internal instability effects such as temperature, vibration, and digital parts in order to reduce noise. The bottleneck acceleration and ageing[23]. Temperature sensitivity of these of the system is the rotating connector which has a limited devices is greatly suppressed with a double active oven control, number of lines (8 closely situated liquid Mercury connections and the impact of vibration and acceleration[24] is reduced by in a single body) and bandwidth (< 100MHz). To avoid employing a resonator of speciﬁc cut according to a symmet- any signal corruption or crosstalk through the connector, only rical arrangement[25]. Together with these facts, the overall DC voltages are supplied through it. All data processing and simplicity and ability to sustain obtain optimum performance digitisation is performed on top of the turntable. for very long periods of time make quartz Voltage Controlled Ovenized Crystal Oscillators (OCXO) an outstanding platform Rotating Connector for phonon sector LIV tests. Analogue+Digital Bias DC Voltage Supply III. SENSITIVITY IMPROVEM ENT Sensitivity of the ﬁrst generation LIV test in the phonon Turntable sector[20] was limited by the frequency stability of the em- ployed quartz oscillators ( 10 of fractional frequency WiFi Data stability), relatively short observation times (120 hours) and Aquisition the extraction of only one SME coefﬁcient based on the noise power spectral density. In the new generation, these major issues have been addressed. Overall, the second generation Signal system is improved by the following means: VCXO2 Processing The frequency stability of mechanical oscillators is in- encoder feedback creased by introducing a pair of state-of-the-art quartz Rotation oscillators from Oscilloquartz with Allan deviation of pressure Controller 10 at 1 second: Measurement time is increased by improving overall Figure 1: Schematic of the rotating experimental setup. reliability of the setup and data acquisition and analysis techniques, allowing the collection and analysis of mea- surements of over one year time spans: The data acquisition is controlled via a single Labview Data acquisition and noise measurement techniques are program that collects universal time, data from the error signals improved by using low noise measurement techniques and of the oscillator frequency comparison, time and angle from measurement devices; the rotation controller, environment temperature in a single Systematic effects related to mechanical tilts and jitter data acquisition loop. This single loop approach guarantees the are reduced using an air-bearing turntable (RT300L Air best matching between data collected on and off the turntable. Bearing from PI) with smaller tilts and rotation instabil- ities and a better quality rotating connector: B. Phase Noise Measurements from Two Oscillator Frequency Long term stability is improved by putting the experi- Comparison ment into more stable and quiet environment with key parameters being monitored and controlled: As it has been described above, the task of LIV detection Data processing and ﬁtting techniques are developed to is reduced to frequency comparison measurements of two better deal with large amounts of data and search for orthogonally orientated oscillators place on the turnable over multiple SME coefﬁcients at a variety of modulation large spans of time. In this work, two ultra-stable 5MHz frequencies. OCXO are used. To measure their phase noise two approaches are implemented: one is based on a standard PLL technique, A. System Architecture the other employs interferometric measurements. The overall The main challenge of any rotating experiment is related to schematic of the phase noise measurement and locking system the need to supply and collect bias voltages, signals and data is shown in Fig. 2, while the results of the phase noise VCXO1 angle time 3 measurements of the two oscillators while stationary are shown in Fig. 3. A) PLL -13 3 RF interferometer 1.6 10 /f Master Carrier suppression control 6dB LNA 10dB 35 dB -1 dBm DC LO 30 dB -1 dBm RF SR560 RF 1.2 V FFT ~4.5dB -14 + 1.2 10 /f Mixer 40 dB FM port Delay line LO (~ 7.5 m) 8.8 dBm Slave 28 dB 21dB Figure 2: Phase noise measurement setup implemented on the turntable. For the rotating setup the voltage signals from the PLL and the interferometer are digitized on the turntable using B) a National Instruments high speed digitizer. The signals are sampled at 1:6 kHz and averaged over 50 samples to achieve a balance between the amount of data and noise levels. System operation over month time scales demonstrate high reliability of the oscillator as well as the PLL and the interferometer. While the PLL stays always ﬁrmly locked, the interferometer carrier suppression may vary. Despite this, the interferometer stays operational over months of non-stop measurements and remains phase sensitive with a constant voltage to phase conversion and with sufﬁcient sensitivity to measure the os- cillator phase noise. Such results are achieved due to high environmental stability. Although, the interferometer is capable to higher sensitivity of the phase noise measurements, for these particular LIV tests only a small frequency range around twice the rotational frequency is important. Typically, in this frequency range (1 5Hz) both measurement techniques give the same results Figure 3: Phase noise measurements of the system oscilla- as both are sensitive enough to measure the oscillator phase tor performance in the lab frame using (A) PLL and (B) noise. Thus, the implementation of the interferometer in the interferometer. Results are consistent with the manufacturers future runs is not necessary for this particular experiment. stability measurements of a ﬂicker ﬂoor of 10 . Phase However the addition of the redundant measurement system noise measurements at the lowest Fourier frequencies become has helped to disentangled the inﬂuence of the systematic inaccurate due to the ﬁnite duration of the data. signal through the quartz oscillators and the measurement system, as both systems show the same spurious signal-noise ratios. For example, the magnetic ﬁeld to voltage conversion are constant in the sun-centred frame, will cause coherent can be attributed to the OCXOs rather than to the measurement frequency modulations with respect to the laboratory frame. apparatus. This is calculated by undertaking the Lorentz transformations of rotations and boosts experienced by the experiment with IV. DATA ANALYSIS respect to the sun-centred frame due to rotation in the lab Besides rotation in the laboratory, If we assume that Lorentz and sidereal and annual orbit rotations. Thus, the expected violation exists, then the frequencies of the two resonators frequency shift is given by; would differ by f . The fractional frequency difference, , f 1 has three major frequency components, 2! , ! , and = (A+ [S sin((2! +! )T )+C cos((2! +! )T )]) i R i i R i f 8 Here ! is the rotational frequency of the experimental table, ! is the sidereal frequency and is the annual frequency, (1) th Here, the i possible putative frequency shifts occurs at 2! + as shown in Figure 4. It has already been shown in [20] that the LIV coefﬁcients ! , T is the local sidereal time deﬁned as the time from in the Standard Model Extension (SME) test theory, which the vernal equinox in the year 2000 and A is the DC shift. 4 ! (offset from 2! ) C S i R ! ! i i DC (A) 4c ~ cos(2) 2 T 0 4 sin c ~ 0 2 T T 2 T 2 sin (cos c ~ 2c ~ sin ) 2 sin c ~ TY TZ TX 2 T T 2 T 2 sin (cos c ~ 2c ~ sin ) 2 sin c ~ TY TZ TX 2(1 + cos ) sin + ! - 2(1 + cos )c ~ sin sin T T T TX (c ~ + cos c ~ + c ~ sin ) TZ TZ TY 2(cos 1) sin - ! + 2(cos 1)c ~ sin sin T T T TX (c ~ + cos c ~ + c ~ sin ) TZ TZ TY T T + ! 4(1 + cos )c ~ sin 4(1 + cos )c ~ sin Y X T T - ! 4(cos 1)c ~ sin 4(cos 1)c ~ sin Y X 2(1 + cos ) sin + ! + 2(1 + cos )c ~ sin sin T T TX [(1 + cos )c ~ + sin c ~ ] TZ TY 2(1 cos ) sin - ! - 2(cos 1)c ~ sin sin T T TX [(1 + cos )c ~ + sin c ~ ] TZ TY 2 T 2 T + 2! - (1 + cos )(1 + cos ) c ~ (1 + cos )(1 + cos ) c ~ TY TX 2 T 2 T - 2! + (1 + cos )(1 + cos ) c ~ (1 + cos )(1 + cos ) c ~ TY TX T 2 2 T + 2! 2c ~ (1 + cos ) 2(1 + cos ) c ~ 2 T 2 T - 2! 2(cos 1) c ~ 2(cos 1) c ~ 2 T 2 T + 2! + (cos 1)(1 + cos ) c ~ (1 cos )(1 + cos ) c ~ TY TX 2 T 2 T - 2! - (cos 1)(1 + cos ) c ~ (cos 1)(1 + cos ) c ~ TY TX Table I: Relation between SME neutron c coefﬁcients and frequency components of Eqn. (1), which are also pictorially shown in Fig.5. Note, these coefﬁcients were originally derived in [20], they are presented here again with a few small typographical errors ﬁxed. Here is the colatitude of the lab, is the declination of the Earth’s orbit relative to the sun centered frame and is the boost of the lab with respect to the sun centered frame. A. Demodulated Least Square Method Many experiments that search for putative LIV coefﬁcients apply the technique of least square ﬁtting [27], [28], [6], [29], [30]. However, for experiments that compare oscillators, minimum frequency instabilities typically occur on time scales of the order of 1 to 100 seconds[31], so rotating the experiment (a) can signiﬁcantly enhance the precision of the experiment, (b) compared to relying on the Earth rotation. When combined Figure 4: Illustration of three frequency components: (a) Two with rotation in the lab, the technique of Demodulated Least orthogonal oscillators placed on a rotational table, rotating at Squares (DLS) becomes a favourable technique[32], [33], frequency ! . (b) Sidereal frequency ! and annual frequency [34], [35]. This is because the data ﬁles can become quite large, when taking such data over a period of one year. For example, if an experiment relies on sidereal rotation data maybe averaged over thousands of seconds to resolve a sidereal period resulting in the order of 10 data points to search for the required frequency modulations. However, to attain maximum sensitivity we necessarily rotate our experiment on the order of 1 second, and therefore must take data with a measurement time of order 0.1 seconds, which leads to a 8 9 requirement of searching for LIV with 10 to 10 data points. Thus, implementing the least squares method to extract the required coefﬁcients from such a long set of data will become lengthy. We found that the DLS technique not only is quicker, but can extract parameters with better signal to noise ratio with respect to ordinary least squares (OLS), but in contrast Figure 5: Illustration of frequency components of caused requires a two stage process. by putative LIV coefﬁcients In the ﬁrst stage, we effectively demodulate the 2! compo- nents using OLS to create a demodulated data set, while in the second stage, we extract the expected frequency components from the created data set. Compared to using OLS the DLS The frequency components are illustrated diagrammatically in technique decreases the time necessary to process the data. Figure 5. We list a similar table to that as published in [20] in This is because most of the data is averaged in the ﬁrst stage Tab.I, however we point out there are some slight differences over a ﬁnite number of rotations at the largest frequency due to typographical errors in the one presented in [20]. component, 2! . It has been shown there is an optimum R 5 ! C C i C;! S;! i i 2 T 0 4 sin c ~ 0 2 T T 2 T 4 sin (cos c ~ 2c ~ sin ) 4 sin c ~ TY TZ TX T T T 4 cos (c ~ + cos c ~ + c ~ sin ) TZ TZ TY 4 cos c ~ sin sin TX sin T T ! 8c ~ sin 8 cos c ~ sin Y X T T 4[(1 + cos )c ~ + cos c ~ sin ] TZ TY ! + 4 cos c ~ sin sin TX sin 2 T 2 T 2! 2(1 + cos )(1 + cos )c ~ 2(1 + cos )(1 + cos )c ~ TY TX T 2 2 T 2! 4c ~ (cos + 1) 4(1 + cos )c ~ 2 T 2 T 2! + 2(1 + cos )(cos 1)c ~ 2(1 cos )(1 + cos )c ~ TY TX ! S S i C;! S;! i i 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T 4(c ~ + cos c ~ + c ~ sin ) sin 4c ~ sin sin TZ TZ TY TX T T ! 8c ~ sin 8 cos c ~ sin X Y T T T ! + 4[cos (1 + cos )c ~ + c ~ sin ] sin 4c ~ sin sin TZ TY TX T T 2! 4(1 + cos ) cos c ~ 4(1 + cos ) cos c ~ TX TY T T 2! 8c ~ cos 8c ~ cos T T 2! + 4(1 cos ) cos c ~ 4 cos (cos 1)c ~ TX TY Table II: Relationship between DLS parameters and SME neutron c coefﬁcients from Eqns. (3) and (4), which is shown pictorially in Fig. 6. Here is the colatitude of the lab, is the declination of the Earth’s orbit relative to the sun centered frame and is the boost of the lab with respect to the sun centered frame. number of rotations, which will balance of the narrow band the least square method may be used to ﬁnd corresponding systematic noise due to rotation and the broad band electronic putative LIV coefﬁcients. Previously, the sensitivity to neutron noise in the system[32]. coefﬁcients in the SME were calculated for only the case Equation (1) can be rewritten as a function of 2! as; in Figure 4[20] at only 2! . Here we calculate the relation R R between the demodulated frequency amplitude and the neutron f 1 = (A + S(T ) sin(2! T ) + C (T ) cos(2! T )): SME coefﬁcients, which are shown in Table II. We can use R R f 8 these relations to calculate SME coefﬁcients from the least (2) square ﬁtted parameters of the second stage of the DLS. In this rearrangement, S(T ) and C (T ) contains rest of the frequency components; B. Data extraction and pre-processing S(T ) = S + S sin(! T ) + S cos(! T ) (3) 0 s;i i c;i i At each time t, we effectively measure the difference of the two resonance frequencies by measuring the voltage, V (t), at C (T ) = C + C sin(! T ) + C cos(! T ): (4) 0 s;i i c;i i the output of the PLL or Mixer. We record the time t and the angle of the rotational table (t). From V (t), (t), and R R Each demodulated frequency, ! , corresponds to each fre- t, we may search for SME coefﬁcients through least square ﬁtting of each frequency component. In our experiment, the data has been divided into four runs; run 8, run 9, run 10, and run 11, as shown in Table III. They start at different times and in general have different rotation speed ! , which is deﬁned as follows in Equation 5: ! = (5) dt We analyze individually the seperate runs to study the effect of modiﬁcations undertaken between each experimental run. run 8 run 9 run 10 run 11 Date 16/03/17 29/03/17 23/03/17 16/03/17 Time 5:41:09 am 8:06:14 am 1:30:23 pm 10:57:57 am ! 360 =s 360 =s 420 =s 320 =s Figure 6: Illustration of frequency components of caused by Days 13 54 23 63 putative LIV coefﬁcients once the frequency is demodulated. Table III: Characteristic of each data run. Here, the Date and quency component in Figure 6. Compared to Figure 5, Fig- Time are the starting time for each run, recorded in UTC ure 6 only have positive ! . This is because the ! and i i format. Different runs had different ! . Run 8 and 9 had the ! components are added together when demodulating. The same ! and were recorded continuously. Days indicates the corresponding demodulated data ﬁles are now similar to an time span of each run. experiment that uses no active rotation in the laboratory and 6 The fractional frequency difference of the two oscillators frequency, which will depend on the Fourier frequency offset was recorded from both the PLL and the output Mixer of since the two oscillator measurement is proportional to phase. the interferometer, and we calculated the Power Spectrum Secondly, we need to convert local time tag to the time tag in Density (PSD) from the time series of voltage measured from the sun-centered frame [19]. To convert the voltage from Mixer these ports. Here we use run 9 as an example, we calculated to the fractional frequency of two oscillators. We deﬁne the its PSD from both PLL and Mixer, as shown in Figure 7. linear conversion factor C so that: We zoom in at twice the rotational frequency, as shown in = C V (6) Figure 8. Comparing the data recorded by PLL and Mixer, f we can see that the frequency dependence of the PSD is where V is the voltage from the Mixer. C is linearly propor- similar. The difference in magnitude is mainly due to the tional to ! and since the runs differ by their rotational speed, different calibration factor. It was conﬁrmed that the difference any putative signals would occur close to 2 f , thus the in sensitivity in both channels was negligible from start to measurements would have different C due to appearing at a ﬁnish of the data extraction and analysis procedure, so in the different Fourier frequency, as shown in Table 3. Furthermore, end we only present results from the voltage output of the PLL. we need to convert the local time, t, to the local sidereal time There were some different spurious signals at other frequencies in the sun centered frame, T , by adding an offset t [19]. when comparing both systems, but this had no impact on the sensitivity near twice the rotation frequency. T = t + t (7) The offset changes the local frame to the sun centered frame. Run 9 (525h): Mixer Because we need to measure the physical quantity in an inertial Run 9 (525h): PLL 2× f 20 R frame, we set the sun-centered frame as the standard frame for our local coordinates. This means that all the physical quantity should be calculated from this standard frame. The sidereal phase (phase with respect to the sidereal rotation of the Earth), , is one of the quantities we are interested in: = ! T : (8) If our local frame coincides with the standard frame when the experiment just started, then t = 0 and = 0, and t = T . However, this is highly unlikely, in general it is necessary to add an offset, t , to the local time tag t to make sure the -3 -2 -1 0 1 sidereal phase is measured in the standard frame. Since the 10 10 10 10 10 different runs started at a different times, their t offsets are f (Hz) 0 different, as shown in Table IV. Note the offsets are calculated Figure 7: Power Density Spectrum of the voltage measured after subtracting multiple values of 2 with respect to the from Mixer and PLL in run 9. vernal equinox in the year 2000, so the beginning of run 8 starts as close as possible to the value of t = 0, without becoming negative. Run 9 (525h): Mixer Run 9 (525h): PLL run 8 run 9 run 10 run 11 20 t (s) 4055.88 1135960.88 5907409.88 7971863.88 C (1=V ) 10 6.65726 6.65726 7.76803 5.91756 Table IV: Pre-processing parameters, t and C for each run, 0 f t translates the time tag to local sidereal time, while C 0 f calibrates the Mixer Voltage to fractional frequency for the selected rotation frequency. V. PRELIMINARY RESULTS From the pre-processed data, we obtained data ﬁles with , T , and . During the ﬁrst stage of the DLS, we seperate 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 the processed data into several continuous subsets. The size of f− 2× f (μHz) the subset was characterized by the number of rotations, N , chosen to optimise the signal to noise ratio. Implementing the Figure 8: Power Density Spectrum of the voltage in run 9, OLS method for each subset, we extract values of S(T ) and zoomed in at twice the rotation frequency C (T ) from Equation 2. The time tag was then set as the There are two things we need to convert before searching averaged local sidereal time of the subset. For example, ﬁtted for LIV. Firstly, we need to convert the voltage to fractional values of S(T ) from run 11 is shown in Figure 9. p p PSD (dBV/ Hz ) PSD (dBV/ Hz ) 7 The data ﬁles containing S(T ) and C (T ) were largely has little effect. In the long run, the reduction in channel reduced in size compared to the original size. For example, loadings demonstrated signiﬁcant improvement in systematic we determined in run 11 that ﬁtting over N = 1000 rotations effects related to the timing clearly observed in run 11. gave optimal signal to noise ratio, which in turn reduces the original data set by more than a factor of 10 . In the second stage of the DLS, we then ﬁt the coefﬁcients S , S , C , s;i c;i s;i and C from Equation 3 and 4, using the OLS method (it is c;i also possible to use weighted least squares if the noise deviates far from white noise). For these preliminary results, we ignore the annual frequency components because the data set is too small to resolve them. In the future after a year of data has been taken it will be possible to put limits on all SME coefﬁcients indicated in Table II. 4 5 To get an indication of the sensitivity of our experiment, values for S were ﬁtted from the data (as in ﬁgure 9 for c;! run 11) and are shown in Figure 10 as a function of normalised frequency (with respect to sidereal) for all experimental runs. It is clear that runs 8 to 10 are limited by an extra noise process that scatters the excursions from zero at an amplitude greater than the standard errors of the ﬁtting, while in run 11 the systematic was eliminated. To understand systematics we undertook measurements of the most likely parameters that would inﬂuence the mea- surements. During run 10 the temperature was continuously monitored in unison with the experiment. Data ﬁles under went the same process as the demodulated least squares. Results Figure 9: Data values for S(T ) as a function of time in days revealed no signiﬁcant temperature effects at the rotation or for N = 1000 for run 11, here is the standard deviation of sidereal frequencies above the standard error of ﬂuctuations, so S(T ). this effect was ruled out. The amplitude of the rotation system- atics proved to be sensitive to magnetic ﬁeld, measurements were made to measure the magnetic ﬁeld in the laboratory as −14 ×10 a function of time. However, it was shown that the magnetic run 8&9 ﬁeld was not the cause of the extra systematic ﬂuctuation as run 10 observed in Figure 10 for runs 8 to 10. run 11 The limitation of runs 8 to 10 was shown to come from the ω fact that the data acquisition runs on a non-realtime operating system relying on WiFi data acquisition. The operating system −2 limits sampling stability and, as we learned, may result in smearing of the systematic signals that can eventually limit −15 ×10 the performance. Furthermore, the wireless network running on run 11 month time scales may interrupt the data acquisition randomly leaving substantial (a few seconds) data gaps. Although, these −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 interruptions on their own do not directly limit the system ω /ω estimated performance, they do not allow application of direct Figure 10: The ﬁtted S coefﬁcient with N = 10 as spectral methods as applied in our original experiment[20], c;! r a function of normalized frequency !=! for the different as these methods assume uniformity of the time scale and experimental runs. thus cannot be directly applied to data with gaps (unlike the implementation of the least squares method). To reduce these systematic effects related to the stability of We have also gone through the process of optimizing N the timing on the WiFi based acquisition channel, the amount at 2! for the ﬁrst stage of the DLS technique to end up of data retrieved from the digitizer at each acquisition step with the best signal to noise ratio at the end of the entire was reduced for run 11 by 40%, which in principle could process. The optimized value of N minimizes the standard deteriorate the signal to noise ratio due to decimation of data. error of the ﬁtted SME coefﬁcients, and can be interpreted as However, due to the high frequency of the acquisition (1.6 a balance between two processes, the broad band white noise kHz sampling rate) this deterioration only happens primarily in the system, and the narrow band noise due to ﬂuctuations at higher frequencies when compared to the rotation frequency of the stability of the rotation (systematic noise). When the where the data is dominated by the measurement apparatus system is dominated by white noise, averaging by ﬁtting over noise ﬂoor. Thus near the frequencies of interest this change a large number of rotations helps to reduce the standard error. S S c, c, 8 However, if the narrowband rotation systematic ﬂuctuates the The data from this experiment can be easily adapted to ﬁtting to the systematic at the rotation harmonic becomes more search for higher dimensions SME LIV coefﬁcients in the uncertain at large values of N . The optimal value is attained phonon/matter sector in a similar way that has been imple- when the noise contributed by both processes is equal [32]. mented for rotating sapphire oscillators in the photon sector While the white noise is nearly constant throughout all relevant [35], [42], [43], [44]. This will most likely to include the Fourier frequencies, the systemic noise can vary from run to analysis of a range of other harmonics of the rotation and run. As we can see from Figure 10, our experiment is mostly sidereal frequencies, as has been done in the past in the photon limited by systemic noise in runs 8 to 10 with N = 10 over sector. all ﬁtted frequencies. The relevant frequencies to search for LIV are at the values !=! =1 or 2. In general runs 8 to 10 ACKNOWLEDGEM ENTS show signiﬁcant results with respect to the precision of the This work was supported by the Australian Research Coun- experiment (standard error) however, if this was due to LIV cil grant number CE170100009 and DP160100253 as well and not an added systematic noise process one would expect as the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) J3680. We thank Paul no signiﬁcance at all other frequencies, which is clearly not the Stanwix for some help with the data analysis. case. By increasing N to 1000 the precision of the experiment is reduced by an order of magnitude, but the averaging time is R EFERENCES large enough to cause the effect of the systematic ﬂuctuations [1] D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, “Cpt violation and the standard to be effectively random (not signiﬁcant). In contrast, the model,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 6760–6774, 06 1997. improvements made for run 11 give an optimum value of [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6760 [2] V. A. Kostelecký and C. D. Lane, “Constraints on lorentz violation from N = 1000, so the rotation systematic has become stable clock-comparison experiments,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 60, p. 116010, Nov enough that the results are no longer signiﬁcant and a much 1999. [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.60. better precision is achieved. We have determined that the 116010 [3] A. Michelson and E. Morley, “On the relative motion of the earth and amplitude of the rotation systematics is limited by magnetic the luminiferous æther,” Phil. Mag., vol. 24, p. 449, 1887. ﬁeld sensitivity. In the next runs shielding will be provided to [4] R. Kennedy and E. Thorndike, “Experimental establishment of the reduce this effect. relativity of time,” Phys. Rev., vol. 42, p. 400, 1932. [5] V. A. Kostelecký and M. Mewes, “Signals for lorentz violation in electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 056 005–, 09 VI. FURTHER WORK AND PERSPECTIVES 2002. [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.66. Based on the results of run 11, we estimate that LIV SME 056005 [6] P. L. Stanwix, M. E. Tobar, P. Wolf, M. Susli, C. R. Locke, E. N. matter coefﬁcients could have limits set of order 10 GeV Ivanov, J. Winterﬂood, and F. van Kann, “Test of lorentz invariance with a years worth of data, due to the improvements detailed in electrodynamics using rotating cryogenic sapphire microwave in this work. This experimental run will be ﬁnished during oscillators,” Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 95, no. 4, p. 040404, 07 2005. [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040404 the second half of 2018. Due to the direct dependence of [7] M. A. Hohensee, P. L. Stanwix, M. E. Tobar, S. R. Parker, D. F. the experiment on the neutron sector, this experiment has an Phillips, and R. L. Walsworth, “Improved constraints on isotropic shift and anisotropies of the speed of light using rotating cryogenic sapphire advantage over recent atomic clock experiments[36] that tests oscillators,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 82, no. 7, pp. 076 001–, 10 2010. [Online]. matter sector LIV coefﬁcients[18], [37]. Despite the better Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.076001 sensitivity, the atomic clock experiments are mainly sensitive [8] C. Eisele, A. Y. Nevsky, and S. Schiller, “Laboratory test of the isotropy of light propagation at the ${10}ˆ{-17}$ level,” Phys. Rev. to the proton, with suppressed sensitivity to neutrons by a Lett, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 090 401–, 08 2009. [Online]. Available: factor of 0.021, and thus can only put limits on a linear http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.090401 combination of the two particles [37]. In the same paper it [9] S. Herrmann, A. Senger, K. Möhle, M. Nagel, E. V. Kovalchuk, and is shown by using the Schmidt model, proton coefﬁcients can A. Peters, “Rotating optical cavity experiment testing lorentz invariance at the ${10}ˆ{-17}$ level,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 105 011–, have independent limits set at a sensitivity better than the limits 11 2009. [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. set by the phonon sector experiments. Thus, the phonon sector 80.105011 experiment may ignore the proton sector and put limits only [10] T. Pruttivarasin, M. Ramm, S. G. Porsev, I. I. Tupitsyn, M. S. Safronova, M. A. Hohensee, and H. Haffner, “Michelson-morley in the neutron sector, as was achieved in the prior experiment analogue for electrons using trapped ions to test lorentz symmetry,” [20]. Nature, vol. 517, no. 7536, pp. 592–595, 01 2015. [Online]. Available: Further improvement of the experimental sensitivity by http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14091 [11] M. Nagel, S. R. Parker, E. V. Kovalchuk, P. L. Stanwix, J. G. Hartnett, improving the frequency stability of quartz oscillators at room E. N. Ivanov, A. Peters, and M. E. Tobar, “Direct terrestrial test of temperature is doubtful, because the technology has reached lorentz symmetry in electrodynamics to 10-18,” Nat Commun, vol. 6, its limits over past couple of decades. Frequency stability of 5 09 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9174 [12] S. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, “High-energy tests of lorentz invariance,” and 10 MHz quartz oscillators is limited by the intrinsic ﬂicker Phys. Rev. D, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 116 008–, 04 1999. [Online]. Available: noise of BAW resonators. An alternative solution would be a http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.116008 transition from room temperature operation to liquid helium [13] A. Gomes, V. A. Kostelecký, and A. J. Vargas, “Laboratory tests of lorentz and $cpt$ symmetry with muons,” Phys. Rev. environment where BAW quartz resonators demonstrate orders D, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 076 009–, 10 2014. [Online]. Available: of magnitude improvement in quality factors[20], [38], [39], http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.076009 which in principle could lead to a three orders of magnitude [14] D. Bear, R. E. Stoner, R. L. Walsworth, V. A. Kostelecký, and C. D. Lane, “Limit on lorentz and ntextit{cpt} violation of the improvement. Although development of frequency standards neutron using a two-species noble-gas maser,” Phys. Rev. Lett, based on cryogenic quartz resonators is associated with several vol. 85, no. 24, pp. 5038–5041, 12 2000. [Online]. Available: technological challenges[40], [41]. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5038 9 [15] B. Altschul, “Limits on neutron lorentz violation from the stability of Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 99, p. 050401, Jul 2007. [Online]. Available: primary cosmic ray protons,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 085 018–, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.050401 10 2008. [Online]. Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. [34] M. E. Tobar, E. N. Ivanov, P. L. Stanwix, J.-M. G. le Floch, 78.085018 and J. G. Hartnett, “Rotating odd-parity lorentz invariance test in [16] V. A. Kostelecký and J. D. Tasson, “Matter-gravity couplings and lorentz electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, p. 125024, Dec 2009. [Online]. violation,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 016 013–, 01 2011. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.125024 Available: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.016013 [35] S. R. Parker, M. Mewes, P. L. Stanwix, and M. E. Tobar, “Cavity bounds on higher-order lorentz-violating coefﬁcients,” Phys. [17] J. M. Brown, S. J. Smullin, T. W. Kornack, and M. V. Romalis, “New Rev. Lett., vol. 106, p. 180401, May 2011. [Online]. Available: limit on lorentz- and $cpt$-violating neutron spin interactions,” Phys. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180401 Rev. Lett, vol. 105, no. 15, pp. 151 604–, 10 2010. [Online]. Available: [36] J. Guena, P. Rosenbusch, P. Laurent, M. Abgrall, D. Rovera, http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.151604 G. Santarelli, M. E. Tobar, S. Bize, and A. Clairon, “Demonstration of [18] P. Wolf, F. Chapelet, S. Bize, and A. Clairon, “Cold atom a dual alkali rb/cs fountain clock,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, clock test of lorentz invariance in the matter sector,” Phys. Rev. Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 647–653, Lett, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 060 801–, 02 2006. [Online]. Available: March 2010. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.060801 [37] H. Pihan-Le Bars, C. Guerlin, R.-D. Lasseri, J.-P. Ebran, Q. G. Bailey, [19] V. A. Kostelecký and N. Russell, “Data tables for lorentz and S. Bize, E. Khan, and P. Wolf, “Lorentz-symmetry test at planck-scale $cpt$ violation,” Reviews of Modern Physics, arXiv:0801.0287, suppression with nucleons in a spin-polarized Cs cold atom clock,” vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 11–31, 03 2011. [Online]. Available: http: Phys. Rev. D, vol. 95, p. 075026, Apr 2017. [Online]. Available: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.11 https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.075026 [20] A. Lo, P. Haslinger, E. Mizrachi, L. Anderegg, H. Müller, [38] M. Goryachev, D. Creedon, S. Galliou, and M. Tobar, “Observation M. Hohensee, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, “Acoustic tests of rayleigh phonon scattering through excitation of extremely high of lorentz symmetry using quartz oscillators,” Physical Review overtones in low-loss cryogenic acoustic cavities for hybrid quantum X, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 011 018–, 02 2016. [Online]. Available: systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 111, no. 8, p. 085502, 2013. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011018 [39] S. Galliou, M. Goryachev, R. Bourquin, P. Abbe, J. Aubry, and M. Tobar, [21] D. Johannsmann, The Quartz Crystal Microbalance in Soft Matter “Extremely low loss phonon-trapping cryogenic acoustic cavities for Research. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015. future physical experiments,” Nature: Scientiﬁc Reports, vol. 3, no. 2132, [22] P. Salzenstein, A. Kuna, L. Sojdr, and J. Chauvin, “Signiﬁcant step in ultra-high stability quartz crystal oscillators,” Electron. Lett., vol. 46, [40] M. Goryachev, S. Galliou, P. Abbe, P. Bourgeois, S. Grop, and B. Dubois, no. 21, pp. 1433–1434, October 2010. “Quartz resonator instabilities under cryogenic conditions,” Ultrasonics, [23] J. R. Vig and T. R. Meeker, “The aging of bulk acoustic wave resonators, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, ﬁlters and oscillators,” Proceedings of the 45th Annual Symposium on no. 1, pp. 21–29, January 2012. Frequency Control 1991, pp. 77–101, 1991. [41] M. Goryachev, S. Galliou, J. Imbaud, and P. Abbé, “Advances in [24] R. L. Filler, “The acceleration sensitivity of quartz crystal oscillators: development of quartz crystal oscillators at liquid helium temperatures,” a review,” Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Cryogenics, vol. 57, no. 0, pp. 104–112, 10 2013. [Online]. Available: Transactions on, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 297–305, May 1988. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011227513000532 [25] R. Besson, J. J. Gagnepain, D. Janiaud, and M. Valdois, “Design of a [42] M. Mewes, “Optical-cavity tests of higher-order lorentz violation,” bulk wave resonator insensitive to acceleration,” 33rd Annual Symposium Phys. Rev. D, vol. 85, p. 116012, Jun 2012. [Online]. Available: on Frequency Control, pp. 337–345, 1979. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.116012 [26] E. N. Ivanov, M. E. Tobar, and R. A. Woode, “Microwave interferometry: [43] Y. Michimura, M. Mewes, N. Matsumoto, Y. Aso, and M. Ando, application to precision measurements and noise reduction techniques,” “Optical cavity limits on higher order lorentz violation,” Phys. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Con- Rev. D, vol. 88, p. 111101, Dec 2013. [Online]. Available: trol, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1526–1536, 1998. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.111101 [27] P. Wolf, S. Bize, A. Clairon, A. N. Luiten, G. Santarelli, and M. E. [44] S. R. Parker, M. Mewes, F. N. Baynes, and M. E. Tobar, “Bounds Tobar, “Tests of lorentz invariance using a microwave resonator,” on higher-order lorentz-violating photon sector coefﬁcients from an Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, p. 060402, Feb 2003. [Online]. Available: asymmetric optical ring resonator experiment,” Physics Letters A, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.060402 vol. 379, no. 42, pp. 2681 – 2684, 2015. [Online]. Available: [28] P. Wolf, S. Bize, A. Clairon, G. Santarelli, M. E. Tobar, and A. N. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960115006726 Luiten, “Improved test of lorentz invariance in electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 70, p. 051902, Sep 2004. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.051902 [29] M. E. Tobar, P. Wolf, S. Bize, G. Santarelli, and V. Flambaum, “Testing local lorentz and position invariance and variation of fundamental constants by searching the derivative of the comparison frequency between a cryogenic sapphire oscillator and hydrogen maser,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 022003, Jan 2010. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.022003 [30] M. E. Tobar, P. L. Stanwix, J. J. McFerran, J. Guéna, M. Abgrall, S. Bize, A. Clairon, P. Laurent, P. Rosenbusch, D. Rovera, and G. Santarelli, “Testing local position and fundamental constant invariance due to periodic gravitational and boost using long- term comparison of the syrte atomic fountains and h-masers,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 87, p. 122004, Jun 2013. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.122004 [31] M. Abgrall, J. Guéna, M. Lours, G. Santarelli, M. E. Tobar, S. Bize, S. Grop, B. Dubois, C. Fluhr, and V. Giordano, “High-stability compari- son of atomic fountains using two different cryogenic oscillators,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1198–1203, Aug 2016. [32] P. L. Stanwix, M. E. Tobar, P. Wolf, C. R. Locke, and E. N. Ivanov, “Improved test of lorentz invariance in electrodynamics using rotating cryogenic sapphire oscillators,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 74, p. 081101, Oct 2006. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD. 74.081101 [33] H. Müller, P. L. Stanwix, M. E. Tobar, E. Ivanov, P. Wolf, S. Herrmann, A. Senger, E. Kovalchuk, and A. Peters, “Tests of relativity by complementary rotating michelson-morley experiments,”
Nuclear Experiment – arXiv (Cornell University)
Published: Apr 8, 2018
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get an introductory month for just $19.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.