Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Bill for the Occupants or au Issue to Negotiate: The Claims of Reparations for Soviet Occupation*

A Bill for the Occupants or au Issue to Negotiate: The Claims of Reparations for Soviet Occupation* Contents 1. Introduction 2. Is There a Claim? 2.1. Request for Damages in the Context of the Withdrawal of Troops 2.2. Continued Efforts Thereafter 3. The Objective Nature of the Right to Reparations 3.1. The Obligation for Reparations 3.2. The Limits of the Obligation to be Defined 4. The Next Steps: Continued Hesitation 4.1. Not a Priority Question 4.2. Finding the Path to Negotiations 5. Conclusions 1. Introductiou After a lengthy discussion, on 13 June 2000 the Lithuanian Parliament adopted a Law on Compensation of Damages Resulting from the Occupation by the USSR (Law on Compensation).1 The law advised the Lithuanian government to submit an estimate of damage inflicted by the Soviet occupation and to form a delegation for negotiations with Russia for compensation. Clear terms were indicated for the first steps: 1 September 2000, form the delegation; 1 October 2000, finish the calculations; and 1 November 2000, submit the written estimate to Russian authorities, and similarly inform the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the European Union. So far, the calculation of the damages remains in the archives of the Lithuanian Government. At the same time the Law on compensation remains in force, unchanged. What prevents http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online Brill

A Bill for the Occupants or au Issue to Negotiate: The Claims of Reparations for Soviet Occupation*

Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online , Volume 3 (1): 20 – Jan 1, 2003

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/a-bill-for-the-occupants-or-au-issue-to-negotiate-the-claims-of-BViOVg6eAg

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
2211-5897
DOI
10.1163/221158903X00054
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Is There a Claim? 2.1. Request for Damages in the Context of the Withdrawal of Troops 2.2. Continued Efforts Thereafter 3. The Objective Nature of the Right to Reparations 3.1. The Obligation for Reparations 3.2. The Limits of the Obligation to be Defined 4. The Next Steps: Continued Hesitation 4.1. Not a Priority Question 4.2. Finding the Path to Negotiations 5. Conclusions 1. Introductiou After a lengthy discussion, on 13 June 2000 the Lithuanian Parliament adopted a Law on Compensation of Damages Resulting from the Occupation by the USSR (Law on Compensation).1 The law advised the Lithuanian government to submit an estimate of damage inflicted by the Soviet occupation and to form a delegation for negotiations with Russia for compensation. Clear terms were indicated for the first steps: 1 September 2000, form the delegation; 1 October 2000, finish the calculations; and 1 November 2000, submit the written estimate to Russian authorities, and similarly inform the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the European Union. So far, the calculation of the damages remains in the archives of the Lithuanian Government. At the same time the Law on compensation remains in force, unchanged. What prevents

Journal

Baltic Yearbook of International Law OnlineBrill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.