Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Sketch of the Concept of ‘Unneutrality’

A Sketch of the Concept of ‘Unneutrality’ Relja Radović I. Introduction Judicial decision-making in international law is a multifaceted topic, invol- 1 2 3 4 5 ving, among others, legal, sociological, cultural, linguistic, political and Associate, BDK Advokati, Belgrade, Serbia. Regarding the legal standards of judicial independence, see, e.g., Lucius Caflisch, ‘Independence and Impartiality of Judges: The European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 2 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 169; Maria Nicole Cleis, The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators: Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions (2017). Regarding the social structuring and grouping of decision-makers, see, e.g., Moshe Hirsch, ‘Investment Tribunals and Human Rights Treaties: A Sociolog- ical Perspective’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (2013) 85; Sergio Puig, ‘Social Capital in the Arbitration Market’ (2014) 25 EJIL 387; Moshe Hirsch, ‘The Sociology of International Investment Law’ in Zachary Douglas, Joost Pauwelyn and Jorge E Viñuales (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (2014) 143; Moshe Hirsch, Invitation to the Sociology of International Law (2015) Ch 5; Malcolm Langford, Daniel Behn and Runar H Lie, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 301. Regarding cultural http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Austrian Review of International and European Law Online Brill

A Sketch of the Concept of ‘Unneutrality’

Download PDF
27 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/a-sketch-of-the-concept-of-unneutrality-Nn2vg4I88k
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
1573-6512
DOI
10.1163/15736512-02501005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Relja Radović I. Introduction Judicial decision-making in international law is a multifaceted topic, invol- 1 2 3 4 5 ving, among others, legal, sociological, cultural, linguistic, political and Associate, BDK Advokati, Belgrade, Serbia. Regarding the legal standards of judicial independence, see, e.g., Lucius Caflisch, ‘Independence and Impartiality of Judges: The European Court of Human Rights’ (2003) 2 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 169; Maria Nicole Cleis, The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators: Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions (2017). Regarding the social structuring and grouping of decision-makers, see, e.g., Moshe Hirsch, ‘Investment Tribunals and Human Rights Treaties: A Sociolog- ical Perspective’ in Freya Baetens (ed), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (2013) 85; Sergio Puig, ‘Social Capital in the Arbitration Market’ (2014) 25 EJIL 387; Moshe Hirsch, ‘The Sociology of International Investment Law’ in Zachary Douglas, Joost Pauwelyn and Jorge E Viñuales (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice (2014) 143; Moshe Hirsch, Invitation to the Sociology of International Law (2015) Ch 5; Malcolm Langford, Daniel Behn and Runar H Lie, ‘The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration’ (2017) 20 Journal of International Economic Law 301. Regarding cultural

Journal

Austrian Review of International and European Law Online – Brill

Published: Jul 12, 2022

There are no references for this article.