Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Non-legally Binding Agreements in International Relations: An Estonian Perspective

Non-legally Binding Agreements in International Relations: An Estonian Perspective Legally non-binding international agreements branded as soft law generally receive little respect and are only rarely studied, yet they are becoming ever more common in international relations, stepping on the toes of the international treaty system. Estonia too is concluding memorandums of understanding (MoUs) more and more often and this Chapter gives an overview of its national views and practice. Estonian national legislation sets few limits to legally non-binding agreements, creating a flexible alternative for conducting diplomacy, and MoUs are beneficial especially for establishing contacts and setting out general areas of cooperation. However, procedural complexity seems to be only a small part of the reason why MoUs are often preferred to treaties – more often it is the lack of a legally binding nature itself that is appealing for the participants and such agreements are deemed binding by other means. A lot of effort goes into keeping MoUs clearly legally non-binding, using specific wording and specific terminology to distinguish them from treaties. Yet despite this distinction, MoUs can still affect the international treaty system by way of related interpretation and gradual development of state behaviour and customary international law. MoUs should therefore be drafted with thorough care and quality, in close cooperation with legal experts. A concept so heavily used with considerable effects should be studied and discussed rather than ostracized as simply not being part of the well-known treaty system under international law. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online Brill

Non-legally Binding Agreements in International Relations: An Estonian Perspective

Mändveer, Martin
Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online , Volume 20 (1): 18 – Dec 19, 2022
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/non-legally-binding-agreements-in-international-relations-an-estonian-00XupB0B2H
Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
2211-5897
DOI
10.1163/22115897_02001_003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Legally non-binding international agreements branded as soft law generally receive little respect and are only rarely studied, yet they are becoming ever more common in international relations, stepping on the toes of the international treaty system. Estonia too is concluding memorandums of understanding (MoUs) more and more often and this Chapter gives an overview of its national views and practice. Estonian national legislation sets few limits to legally non-binding agreements, creating a flexible alternative for conducting diplomacy, and MoUs are beneficial especially for establishing contacts and setting out general areas of cooperation. However, procedural complexity seems to be only a small part of the reason why MoUs are often preferred to treaties – more often it is the lack of a legally binding nature itself that is appealing for the participants and such agreements are deemed binding by other means. A lot of effort goes into keeping MoUs clearly legally non-binding, using specific wording and specific terminology to distinguish them from treaties. Yet despite this distinction, MoUs can still affect the international treaty system by way of related interpretation and gradual development of state behaviour and customary international law. MoUs should therefore be drafted with thorough care and quality, in close cooperation with legal experts. A concept so heavily used with considerable effects should be studied and discussed rather than ostracized as simply not being part of the well-known treaty system under international law.

Journal

Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online – Brill

Published: Dec 19, 2022

There are no references for this article.