Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

State Continuity, Succession and Responsibility: Reparations to the Baltic States and their Peoples?

State Continuity, Succession and Responsibility: Reparations to the Baltic States and their Peoples? Contents 1. Introduction 2. Determining a Breach of International Law 2.1. Facts of the Baltic Cases 2.2. Determining Injured and Responsible States 2.3. Determining a Continuing Breach of International Law 2.4. Applying Rules to the Baltic Cases 3. Form and Duration of a Claim for Reparations 3.1. Statements of the Baltic Claims 3.2. Discharge of Russia's Obligations? 3.3. Waiver of Claims? 3.4. Time Left 4. Available Forums for the Baltic Claims for Reparations 5. Concluding Remarks 1. Introduction In the history of international law the 1990s will probably be called a period of renaissance. A number of difficult areas attracted attention in various forums that produced conventions, reports, judgments, etcetera, which highlighted problems and provided possible solutions aimed at reinforcing the responsibility of States in international law. The work of the International Law Commission (1LC) on Articles on Responsibility for State for Internationally Wrongful Acts (Articles on State Responsibility or 1LC Articles) clearly assisted in increasing the interest about this topic not only among lawyers but also the governments. A wealth of studies and articles has been produced discussing the different issues under the rubric of State responsibility. The ILC Articles have codified the existing principles and practices http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online Brill

State Continuity, Succession and Responsibility: Reparations to the Baltic States and their Peoples?

Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online , Volume 3 (1): 25 – Jan 1, 2003
Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/brill/state-continuity-succession-and-responsibility-reparations-to-the-OERC0wwWJw

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Brill
Copyright
Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
eISSN
2211-5897
DOI
10.1163/221158903X00072
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Determining a Breach of International Law 2.1. Facts of the Baltic Cases 2.2. Determining Injured and Responsible States 2.3. Determining a Continuing Breach of International Law 2.4. Applying Rules to the Baltic Cases 3. Form and Duration of a Claim for Reparations 3.1. Statements of the Baltic Claims 3.2. Discharge of Russia's Obligations? 3.3. Waiver of Claims? 3.4. Time Left 4. Available Forums for the Baltic Claims for Reparations 5. Concluding Remarks 1. Introduction In the history of international law the 1990s will probably be called a period of renaissance. A number of difficult areas attracted attention in various forums that produced conventions, reports, judgments, etcetera, which highlighted problems and provided possible solutions aimed at reinforcing the responsibility of States in international law. The work of the International Law Commission (1LC) on Articles on Responsibility for State for Internationally Wrongful Acts (Articles on State Responsibility or 1LC Articles) clearly assisted in increasing the interest about this topic not only among lawyers but also the governments. A wealth of studies and articles has been produced discussing the different issues under the rubric of State responsibility. The ILC Articles have codified the existing principles and practices

Journal

Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online – Brill

Published: Jan 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.