Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editorial

Editorial Now that I have had the chance to draft my first editorial as the new editor of JANZAM, let me bring you up to date with the innovations that I have been attempting with this journal. 1 will lace that commentary with discussion of the challenges we arc facing in the brave new world ofPBRF and RQF on either side of the Tasman. 2005 SUBMISSIONS r am happy with the quality of submissions I have received this year. I am certainly happy with the quali­ ty of submissions that have been accepted for publication in this edition. Of those submissions to JANZAM whose destiny has been decided, slightly less than 50% have been accepted. If acceptance ratc is one criterion for journal quality, then I think that the quality of JANZAM is heading in the right direction already. Personally, I think that 'acceptance rate' is a somewhat malevolent measure of 'quality'. After all, a low acceptance rate is better than a high acceptance rate. In other words, rejecting articles is seen as a positive. Anyway, like it or not, it is out there as a measure. Six stream best papers from the 2004 ANZAM conference have been submitted this http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Cambridge University Press

Editorial

Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/cambridge-university-press/editorial-xDgh0CugRf

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2005
ISSN
1324-3209
DOI
10.5172/jmo.2005.11.1.iv
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Now that I have had the chance to draft my first editorial as the new editor of JANZAM, let me bring you up to date with the innovations that I have been attempting with this journal. 1 will lace that commentary with discussion of the challenges we arc facing in the brave new world ofPBRF and RQF on either side of the Tasman. 2005 SUBMISSIONS r am happy with the quality of submissions I have received this year. I am certainly happy with the quali­ ty of submissions that have been accepted for publication in this edition. Of those submissions to JANZAM whose destiny has been decided, slightly less than 50% have been accepted. If acceptance ratc is one criterion for journal quality, then I think that the quality of JANZAM is heading in the right direction already. Personally, I think that 'acceptance rate' is a somewhat malevolent measure of 'quality'. After all, a low acceptance rate is better than a high acceptance rate. In other words, rejecting articles is seen as a positive. Anyway, like it or not, it is out there as a measure. Six stream best papers from the 2004 ANZAM conference have been submitted this

Journal

Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management – Cambridge University Press

Published: Jan 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.