Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers

Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Archaeological Dialogues Cambridge University Press

Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers

Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 28 (2): 22 – Dec 1, 2021

Is it possible to reconstruct a prehistoric religion? Latvian archaeology versus the believers

Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 28 (2): 22 – Dec 1, 2021

Abstract

Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/cambridge-university-press/is-it-possible-to-reconstruct-a-prehistoric-religion-latvian-qPof7yBLzE
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
ISSN
1478-2294
eISSN
1380-2038
DOI
10.1017/S1380203821000209
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Today there is a revival of groups who claim to practice ancient Latvian religion. They often accuse archaeologists of lying and concealing the evidence of Latvian past superiority. On the one hand, this might be considered a misuse of archaeological data in order to support religious or nationalistic beliefs. On the other hand, hypothetical reconstructions of prehistoric religious beliefs are related to public archaeology and the relationship between science and the wider society. The aim of this paper is to investigate attempts to reconstruct ancient Latvian prehistoric religion through the lens of the archaeology of religion, and at the same time to broaden the discussion into the problematic relationship between nationalism and public archaeology.

Journal

Archaeological DialoguesCambridge University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2021

Keywords: Archaeology of religion; public archaeology; national identity; nationalism; neopaganism; Dievturība

References