Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape

Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape Abstract The paper investigates suitability of digital surface model for visibility analysis in GIS. In experiment there were analysed viewsheds from 14 observer points calculated on digital surface model, digital terrain model and its comparison to field survey. Data sources for the investigated models were LiDAR digital terrain model and LiDAR digital surface model with vegetation distributed by the Czech Administration for Land Surveying and Cadastre. The overlay method was used for comparing accuracy of models and the reference model was LiDAR digital surface model. Average equalities in comparison with LiDAR digital terrain model, ZABAGED model and field survey were 15.5 %, 17.3% and 20.9%, respectively. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae de Gruyter

Comparison of Digital Elevation Models by Visibility Analysis in Landscape

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/comparison-of-digital-elevation-models-by-visibility-analysis-in-5I0IjZpM6c

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the
ISSN
1338-5259
eISSN
1338-5259
DOI
10.1515/ahr-2016-0007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The paper investigates suitability of digital surface model for visibility analysis in GIS. In experiment there were analysed viewsheds from 14 observer points calculated on digital surface model, digital terrain model and its comparison to field survey. Data sources for the investigated models were LiDAR digital terrain model and LiDAR digital surface model with vegetation distributed by the Czech Administration for Land Surveying and Cadastre. The overlay method was used for comparing accuracy of models and the reference model was LiDAR digital surface model. Average equalities in comparison with LiDAR digital terrain model, ZABAGED model and field survey were 15.5 %, 17.3% and 20.9%, respectively.

Journal

Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturaede Gruyter

Published: Nov 1, 2016

References