Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Graham, Campbell Harvey (1999)
The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the FieldJournal of Financial Abstracts eJournal
LI (2003)
Strategic Decision Model for Multi - Attribute Bilateral negotiation with Alternating Offer Proceedings of the thACM Conference on Electronic SanCommerce USA
Hokey Min (1994)
International Supplier SelectionInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24
GRAHAM (2001)
The theory and practice of corporate finance : Evidence from the field of NoJournal Financial Economics
EHRGOTT (2004)
An approach to portfolio optimization ppEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Fadi Alkaraan, D. Northcott (2006)
Strategic capital investment decision-making: A role for emergent analysis tools?: A study of practice in large UK manufacturing companiesBritish Accounting Review, 38
R. Adler (2000)
Strategic investment decision appraisal techniques: The old and the newBusiness Horizons, 43
Distributon (1994)
MIN Supplier Selection Multi Utility Approach of Physical Logistics Management IssueInternational Attribute International Journal, 24
BREALEY (2007)
korporativnih financija Zagreb MATE
VAN HORNE (2002)
financijskog menadžmenta IX izdanje Zagreb MATE
M. Ehrgott, K. Klamroth, C. Schwehm (2004)
An MCDM approach to portfolio optimizationEur. J. Oper. Res., 155
P. Heiskanen (2001)
Generating Pareto‐optimal boundary points in multiparty negotiations using constraint proposal methodNaval Research Logistics (NRL), 48
BERRIOS (2013)
The relationship Between Bank Credit Risk and Profitability and Liquidity The of and research NumberInternational Journal Business Finance
Richard Burns, Joe Walker (2015)
Capital Budgeting Surveys: The Future is NowCorporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies eJournal
K. Sycara (1988)
Utility theory in conflict resolutionAnnals of Operations Research, 12
WALKER (2009)
Capital Budgeting Surveys The Future is Now of IssuesBURNS Journal Finance
GRAHAM (2002)
How Do CFOs Make Capital Budgeting and Capital Structure Decisions of Corporate NoJournal Applied Finance, 15
AbstractThe selection of an investment project is seen as a problem of multi-criteria decision-making. In this paper, a decision-maker uses six attributes i.e. criteria most used by the international companies in practice (net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, accounting rate of return, operating profit margin and return on equity).Individual utility functions are made for each attribute separately and the global utility function as a weighted sum of individual utility functions. For each criterion a final set of arranged pairs i.e. points of utility is determined based on the decision-maker’s assessments. Then, the points obtained are approximated by the utility function.Finally, the optimization issue solved in order to obtain the optimal performance of the selected project according to decision-maker’s opinion. The negotiation procedure enables the offered performances to approach optimal performance of the selected project aimed at decision-maker and investor reaching an agreement.
Acta Economica Et Turistica – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.