Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Multinormativity Emerges From Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19th-Century Brazil

Multinormativity Emerges From Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations... AbstractI analyse how the Council of Trent was employed in cases of examinations for ecclesiastical benefices in 19th-century Brazil, relying on sources from the Council of State and the Congregation of the Council. Considering the Church within a scenario of multinormativity and multilevel governance, I argue that the interactions for the resolution of ordinary problems conveyed – and even catalysed – different interpretations of legal norms, depending on the agents interacting and the normative conventions adopted. In the case of Imperial Brazil, I suggest the uses of Trent shifted from a convention of amalgam to a convention of separation, with significant nuances. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Administory de Gruyter

Multinormativity Emerges From Multilevel Governance. Uses of the Council of Trent in Examinations for Ecclesiastical Benefices in 19th-Century Brazil

Administory , Volume 5 (1): 20 – Dec 1, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/multinormativity-emerges-from-multilevel-governance-uses-of-the-TQqXCiagj4

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2021 Anna Clara Lehmann Martins, published by Sciendo
eISSN
2519-1187
DOI
10.2478/adhi-2020-0007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractI analyse how the Council of Trent was employed in cases of examinations for ecclesiastical benefices in 19th-century Brazil, relying on sources from the Council of State and the Congregation of the Council. Considering the Church within a scenario of multinormativity and multilevel governance, I argue that the interactions for the resolution of ordinary problems conveyed – and even catalysed – different interpretations of legal norms, depending on the agents interacting and the normative conventions adopted. In the case of Imperial Brazil, I suggest the uses of Trent shifted from a convention of amalgam to a convention of separation, with significant nuances.

Journal

Administoryde Gruyter

Published: Dec 1, 2020

There are no references for this article.