Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Towards a History of Files

Towards a History of Files AbstractFiles may seem an obvious topic for historians of public administration, but that is by no means self-evident. Despite the interest in files from sociologists and archival scientists in the early 20th century, historians have engaged more with the contents of files than with their genres, materialities and functions. After tracing the theoretical and methodological engagements with files from Max Weber and Heinrich Otto Meisner to Cornelia Vismann and Bruno Latour, we argue firstly that files are defined by their relation to other records they compile. At the same time, they transmute these documents into cases and bureaucratic objects. Secondly, just as files bring documents together, they connect the activities of individuals and organizations. However, we argue that the degree to which files are instruments of formal administrative control and organizational coherence has been exaggerated, obscuring the agency of users and the potential for files to serve other ends. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Administory de Gruyter

Towards a History of Files

Hull, Matthew S.; Nellen, Stefan; Rohringer, Thomas
Administory , Volume 4 (1): 7 – Dec 1, 2019
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/towards-a-history-of-files-ru09v4sBzN

References (16)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2020 Matthew S. Hull et al., published by Sciendo
eISSN
2519-1187
DOI
10.2478/adhi-2019-0001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractFiles may seem an obvious topic for historians of public administration, but that is by no means self-evident. Despite the interest in files from sociologists and archival scientists in the early 20th century, historians have engaged more with the contents of files than with their genres, materialities and functions. After tracing the theoretical and methodological engagements with files from Max Weber and Heinrich Otto Meisner to Cornelia Vismann and Bruno Latour, we argue firstly that files are defined by their relation to other records they compile. At the same time, they transmute these documents into cases and bureaucratic objects. Secondly, just as files bring documents together, they connect the activities of individuals and organizations. However, we argue that the degree to which files are instruments of formal administrative control and organizational coherence has been exaggerated, obscuring the agency of users and the potential for files to serve other ends.

Journal

Administory – de Gruyter

Published: Dec 1, 2019

There are no references for this article.