Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-quality-assessment-instrument-for-multi-criteria-decision-support-j6jw3shB8A
References (15)
-
W. Cats-Baril, G. Huber (1987)
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR ILL‐STRUCTURED PROBLEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDYDecision Sciences, 18
-
Steven Alter (1980)
Decision support systems : current practice and continuing challenges -
10.1007/978-3-642-76537-7_7
-
B. Bass (1984)
Organizational decision makingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 29
-
I. Benbasat, A. Dexter (1982)
Individual-Differences In The Use Of Decision Support AidsJournal of Accounting Research, 20
-
R. Horn (1973)
Empirical studies of management information systemsData Base, 5
-
M. Norusis (1992)
SPSS for Windows : professional statistics, release 5 -
R. Sharda, Steve Barr, James McDonnell (1988)
Decision support system effectiveness: a review and an empirical testManagement Science, 34
-
S. Mcintyre (1982)
An Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment-Based Marketing ModelsManagement Science, 28
-
Norman Eckel (1983)
THE IMPACT OF PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION ON DECISION BEHAVIOR AND PERFORMANCE IN AN EXPERIMENTAL GAMEDecision Sciences, 14
-
H. Kaiser (1974)
An index of factorial simplicityPsychometrika, 39
-
P. Keen, M. Morton (1978)
Decision support systems : an organizational perspective -
I. Benbasat, R. Schroeder (1977)
An Experimental Investigation of Some MIS Design VariablesMIS Q., 1
-
M. Goslar, G. Green, T. Hughes (1986)
Decision support systems: an empirical assessment for decision making -
M. Dror, P. Shoval, A. Yellin (1991)
Multiobjective linear programming : Another DSSDecis. Support Syst., 7
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1351-3036
- DOI
- 10.1108/14635779610153336
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Presents the findings concerning a search for an objective way of assessing the quality of commercially‐available, multi‐criteria decision support software. As hardware prices continue to decline, consumers are spending relatively large sums of money on software. There is a powerful need for decision makers to justify these cash outlays based on the impact on the quality of the decisions made using multi‐criteria tools. After a thorough literary search for such an assessment uncovered the lack of field‐tested assessment batteries, develops an evaluation tool and undertakes an experiment to gain insight on the performance of this evaluation tool.
Journal
Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1996
Keywords: Computer software; Decision‐support systems; Management information systems; Quality