Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
William Eureka, N. Ryan (1988)
The customer-driven company : managerial perspectives on QFD
Craig Giffi, A. Roth, Gregory Seal (1990)
Competing in World Class Manufacturing: America's 21st Century Challenge
D. Garvin (1987)
Competing on the Eight Dimensions of QualityHarvard Business Review
D. Scheurell
Using QFD (Quality Function Deployment) in the Context of Concurrent Engineering
J. Hauser, D. Clausing, D. Garvin (1988)
The House of QualityHarvard Business Review
A.V. Roth, A. Marucheck
The Knowledge Factory: A Paradigm for Accelerated Learning Practices
K.N. Gopalakrishnan, B.E. McIntyre, J.C. Sprague
Implementing Internal Quality Improvement with the House of Quality
C. Adiano
Design of a House of Quality
S. Mizuno
Management for Quality Improvement: The 7 New QC Tools
K. Ferdows, A. Meyer (1990)
Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New TheoryJournal of Operations Management, 9
W. Atkinson
The Customer Responsive Manufacturing Organization
C. Adiano
Applying Quality Function Deployment
S. Guitierrez, R. Komm, C. Tulkoff, G. Rupp
Making a Transition from Solvents to Water No‐clean: A Roadmap for Success
A. Roth, A. Marucheck, A. Kemp, Dong Trimble (1994)
The Knowledge Factory for accelerated learning practices, 22
A. Griffin (1992)
Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product TeamsManagement Science, 38
A.V. Roth, C.A. Giffi
Critical Factors for Achieving World Class Manufacturing: Benchmarking North American Manufacturing Strategies
R. Hayes, S. Wheelwright, K. Clark (1988)
Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization
A. Griffin, J. Hauser (1993)
The Voice of the CustomerMarketing Science, 12
D. Dimancescu
The Seamless Enterprise
N.J. Pennucci
Creating a Process Model for SPC
A. Hiam (1992)
Closing the Quality Gap: Lessons from America's Leading Companies
Describes a dynamic approach to quality function deployment (QFD) that translates customer wants and needs into relevant product and process parameters. Using feedback loops, this new approach incorporates updated customer satisfaction data and dynamically links evolving requirements directly back into manufacturing and related processes. Updated customer requirements “peg” the key parameters in statistical process control charts. Introduces the concept, illustrates the mechanics of the approach, and describes how it benefited an IBM assembly plant.
Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1994
Keywords: Customer satisfaction; Customer surveys; House of quality; Manufacturing; Performance monitoring; Process control; Production design; Quality function deployment; Statistical process control
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.