Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Gruen (2000)
Membership Customers and Relationship Marketing
D. Arnett, Steve German, S. Hunt (2003)
The Identity Salience Model of Relationship Marketing Success: The Case of Nonprofit MarketingJournal of Marketing, 67
J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson
Multivariate Data Analysis
Robert Underwood, Edward Bond, R. Baer (2001)
Building Service Brands via Social Identity: Lessons from the Sports MarketplaceJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9
S. Stryker, P. Burke (2000)
The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory*Social Psychology Quarterly, 63
M. Denscombe (1998)
The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects
M. Huxley
Value added: the economic and social contribution of cultural facilities and activities in central NSW
S. Dolnicar, B. Grün (2008)
Challenging “Factor–Cluster Segmentation”Journal of Travel Research, 47
R. Fisher, Kirk Wakefield (1998)
Factors leading to group identification: A field study of winners and losersPsychology & Marketing, 15
R. Bennett, A. Sargeant (2005)
The nonprofit marketing landscape: guest editors' introduction to a special sectionJournal of Business Research, 58
C. Raymond
Members Matter, Making the Most of Membership Schemes in the Arts
Fred Mael, Blake Ashforth (1992)
Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identificationJournal of Organizational Behavior, 13
R. Collins
Effective Management
C. Bhattacharya, Kimberly Elsbach (2002)
Us versus Them: The Roles of Organizational Identification and Disidentification in Social Marketing InitiativesJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21
J. Dutton, J. Dukerich, Celia Harquail (1994)
Organizational images and member identification.Administrative Science Quarterly, 39
W.S. Hendon
The general public's participation in art museums: visitors differ from non‐visitors, but not as markedly as case studies have indicated
D. Hall, B. Schneider (1972)
Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organizational type.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
N. Malhotra (1993)
Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation
J. Dutton, J. Dukerich (1991)
Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational AdaptationAcademy of Management Journal, 34
S. Todd, R. Lawson (2001)
Lifestyle segmentation and museum/gallery visiting behaviourInternational Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 6
C. Burton, J. Louviere, Louise Young (2009)
Retaining the visitor, enhancing the experience : identifying attributes of choice in repeat museum visitationInternational Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 14
Debi Hayes, A. Slater (2003)
From ‘social club’ to ‘integrated membership scheme’: developing membership schemes strategicallyInternational Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8
H. Tajfel, J. Turner (2004)
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.
C. Bhattacharya, H. Rao, M. Glynn (1995)
Understanding the Bond of Identification: An Investigation of its Correlates among Art Museum Members:Journal of Marketing, 59
R. Madrigal (2001)
Social identity effects in a belief–attitude–intentions hierarchy: Implications for corporate sponsorshipPsychology & Marketing, 18
W. Hendon (1990)
The General Public's Participation in Art Museums:The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 49
Jill Welch, M. Patton (1992)
Qualitative evaluation and research methodsThe Modern Language Journal, 76
S.P. Robbins
Management
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop insight regarding art gallery members' identification with their galleries through the use of segmentation. The antecedents of a member's identification and subsequent involvement with the gallery are explored. Within the four regional art galleries analysed, the authors identify three different segments within the membership groups which illustrate the ways in which gallery members, who identify positively with their gallery, contribute to the organisation through behaviours such as the donation of time and money. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed methods approach was used, including 11 in‐depth interviews with gallery staff and members and a survey ( n =433) of gallery members. The in‐depth interviews were interpreted using content analysis and thematic analysis. The survey results were analysed using exploratory factor analysis and cluster analysis. Findings – The paper's findings suggest that gallery members can be differentiated in terms of the way that they contribute to their art gallery. Three types were identified: promoters, donors and committee members. A number of constructs were used to distinguish between each of the segments, including: member identification, satisfaction, prestige, visibility, contact quality and domain involvement from the current arts marketing literature. Four other constructs which emerged from the qualitative research were also used to profile the clusters: self‐enhancement, organisational culture, social responsibility and elitism which emerged from the qualitative research. Research limitations/implications – Profiling different segments in the market (membership) using sociodemographics, attitudes and donating behaviours allows marketers and managers to more effectively target the segments who can positively contribute to the organisation. Moreover it provides a greater understanding of the membership base and how various members are engaging with their institution. Current methods of marketing are becoming less ideal to obtain marketing objectives, with diminishing returns to scale on marketing programmes an issue. Practical implications – An understanding of the differences between each of these member types will allow galleries to more efficiently use their finite resources. By tailoring offerings to each of the different segments galleries can maximise the value of their membership base. Further, the use of segmentation enables gallery managers to identify segments where members may be less or not engaged and its causes and potential solutions. Social implications – Many non‐profit organisations with a membership base, such as the art galleries sampled in this research, rely on the contribution of their membership to survive. Therefore understanding the relationship between the institution and the membership is important. Originality/value – The paper is unique in the application of segmentation analysis to examine gallery members. It also furthers the current understanding of identification and its role in the relationship between organisation members and their behaviour as members. That is the role of identification in relationship marketing.
Arts Marketing An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 20, 2011
Keywords: Australia; Art galleries; Non‐profit organizations; Relationship marketing; Market segmentation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.