Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Newman, D. Watts (1999)
Renormalization Group Analysis of the Small-World Network ModelPhysics Letters A, 263
V. Buskens (2020)
Spreading information and developing trust in social networks to accelerate diffusion of innovationsTrends in Food Science and Technology, 106
J. Enright, Kitty Meeks, G. Mertzios, V. Zamaraev (2018)
Deleting edges to restrict the size of an epidemic in temporal networksJ. Comput. Syst. Sci., 119
Qiming Liu, Tao Li, Meici Sun (2017)
The analysis of an SEIR rumor propagation model on heterogeneous networkPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 469
Liu Hui, W. Bing-jun, Lu Jun-an, Li Zeng-yang (2021)
Node-set importance and optimization algorithm of nodes selection in complex networks based on pinning controlActa Physica Sinica, 70
Phillip Monin, Richard Bookstaber (2021)
Information flows and crashes in dynamic social networksJournal of Economic Interaction and Coordination
Jiakun Wang, Xinhua Wang, Lipeng Fu (2020)
Evolutionary Game Model of Public Opinion Information Propagation in Online Social NetworksIEEE Access, 8
Masahiro Sasabe (2020)
Mathematical epidemiological analysis of dynamics of delay attacks on pull-based competitive information diffusionComput. Networks, 180
P. Wongthongtham, Bilal Abu-Salih (2018)
Ontology-based approach for identifying the credibility domain in social Big DataJournal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 28
J. Kätsyri, T. Kinnunen, Kenta Kusumoto, P. Oittinen, N. Ravaja (2016)
Negativity Bias in Media Multitasking: The Effects of Negative Social Media Messages on Attention to Television News BroadcastsPLoS ONE, 11
Yun Li, Jiakun Wang (2021)
Cross-network propagation model of public opinion information and its control in coupled double-layer online social networksAslib J. Inf. Manag., 74
Lan Yuexin, Lian Zhixuan, Runxi Zeng, Di Zhu, Xia Yixue, Mo Liu, Peng Zhang (2020)
A statistical model of the impact of online rumors on the information quantity of online public opinionPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Guoyin Jiang, Saipeng Li, Minglei Li (2020)
Dynamic rumor spreading of public opinion reversal on Weibo based on a two-stage SPNR modelPhysica A-statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 558
M. Newman (2004)
1 Who is the best connected scientist ? A study of scientific coauthorship networks
Soumik Mandal, C. Shah, Stephanie Peña-Alves, M. Hecht, Shannon Glenn, Anne Ray, K. Greene (2020)
Understanding the spread of prevention and cessation messages on social media for substance use in youthAslib J. Inf. Manag., 73
James Meneghello, Nik Thompson, Kevin Lee, Kok Wong, Bilal Abu-Salih (2019)
Unlocking Social Media and User Generated Content as a Data Source for Knowledge ManagementInt. J. Knowl. Manag., 16
Jiakun Wang, Xinhua Wang, Yun Li (2019)
A discrete electronic word-of-mouth propagation model and its application in online social networksPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
Asma Azizi, C. Montalvo, B. Espinoza, Yun Kang, C. Castillo-Chavez (2019)
Epidemics on networks: Reducing disease transmission using health emergency declarations and peer communicationInfectious Disease Modelling, 5
D. Zanette (2001)
Dynamics of rumor propagation on small-world networks.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 65 4 Pt 1
B. Anderson, Mengbin Ye (2019)
Recent Advances in the Modelling and Analysis of Opinion Dynamics on Influence NetworksInternational Journal of Automation and Computing, 16
Lifan Zhang, Chang Su, Yafang Jin, M. Goh, Zhenyong Wu (2018)
Cross-network dissemination model of public opinion in coupled networksInf. Sci., 451-452
Giridhar Maji, Sharmistha Mandal, S. Sen (2020)
A systematic survey on influential spreaders identification in complex networks with a focus on K-shell based techniquesExpert Syst. Appl., 161
Salma Al-Tuwairqi, Sarah Al-Sheikh, Reem Al-Amoudi (2015)
Qualitative Analysis of a Rumor Transmission Model with Incubation MechanismOpen Access Library Journal, 2
S. Havlin, N. Araújo, S. Buldyrev, C. Dias, Roni Parshani, G. Paul, H. Stanley (2009)
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networksNature, 464
(2020)
A review of epidemic dynamics on complex networks
Xiangbin Yan, Ping Jiang (2018)
Effect of the dynamics of human behavior on the competitive spreading of informationComput. Hum. Behav., 89
(2021)
On network public opinion dissemination and response of enterprise crisis events based on system dynamics
M. Thelwall, Saheeda Thelwall (2020)
A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets: consensus, information, dissent and lockdown lifeAslib J. Inf. Manag., 72
Mark Granovetter (1978)
Threshold Models of Collective BehaviorAmerican Journal of Sociology, 83
Physical Review E, 64
Zhongtian Chen, Hanlin Lan (2021)
Dynamics of Public Opinion: Diverse Media and Audiences' ChoicesJ. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., 24
D. Daley, D. Kendall (1964)
Epidemics and RumoursNature, 204
B. McInnes, Jannene McBride, N. Evans, David Lambert, A. Andrew (1999)
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Under the new media environment, while enjoying the convenience brought by the propagation of public opinion information (referred to as public opinion), learning the evolution process of public opinion and strengthening the governance of the spreading of public opinion are of great significance to promoting economic development and maintaining social stability as well as effectively resisting the negative impact of its propagation.Design/methodology/approachThinking about the results of empirical research and bibliometric analysis, this paper focused on introducing key factors such as information content, social strengthening effects, etc., from both internal and external levels, dynamically designed public opinion spreading rules and netizens' state transition probability. Subsequently, simulation experiments were conducted to discuss the spreading law of public opinion in two types of online social networks and to identify the key factors which influencing its evolution process. Based on the experimental results, the governance strategies for the propagation of negative public opinion were proposed finally.FindingsThe results show that compared with other factors, the propagation of public opinion depends more on the attributes of the information content itself. For the propagation of negative public opinion, on the one hand, the regulators should adopt flexible guidance strategy to establish a public opinion supervision mechanism and autonomous system with universal participation. On the other hand, they still need to adopt rigid governance strategy, focusing on the governance timing and netizens with higher network status to forestall the wide-diffusion of public opinion.Practical implicationsThe research conclusions put forward the enlightenment for the governance of public opinion in management practice, and also provided decision-making reference for the regulators to reasonably respond to the propagation of public opinion.Originality/valueOur research proposed a research framework for the discussion of public opinion propagation process and had important practical guiding significance for the governance of public opinion propagation.
Aslib Journal of Information Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 23, 2023
Keywords: Public opinion information; Propagation; Online social networks; Internal factors; External factors; Governance strategy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.