Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sheung-Tak Cheng, T. Lum, L. Lam, H. Fung (2013)
Hong Kong: embracing a fast aging society with limited welfare.The Gerontologist, 53 4
Wong Hung (2012)
Changes in Social Policy in Hong Kong since 1997 Old Wine in New Bottles
(2002)
Report of the Task Force on Population Policy
Y.C. Wong (2012a)
Can we afford old age social security?
OECD (2009)
10.1787/9789264059771-en
D. Gomez Hernandez, F. Stewart (2008)
Comparison of costs + fees in countries with private defined countribution pension systems
K. Lee, Benny To, K. Yu (2014)
The new paradox of thrift: Financialisation, retirement protection, and income polarisation in Hong KongChina perspectives, 2014
S. Chiu (2003)
Local Policy in Global Politics: The Limit of Anti-poverty Policy in Hong Kong, 7
(2019)
Hong Kong poverty situation report 2018
K. Ng (2011)
Review Essay: Prospects for Old-Age Income Security in Hong Kong and SingaporeJournal of Population Ageing, 4
(2020)
Investment performance of the MPF system in 2019
(2015)
Retirement protection forging ahead: consultation document
World Bank (1994)
10.1596/0-8213-2970-7
This paper demonstrates that Hong Kong currently provides four pillars of old-age protection: a publicly managed and noncontributory social security system (zero pillar), a funded contribution scheme (the second pillar), voluntary personal savings (the third pillar) and informal support, formal social programs and other individual financial assets (the fourth pillar). This paper aims at evaluating current four pillars of old-age protection and unraveling the deep-seated causes underlying the current old-age protection model by tracing a short history from 1965 onward. This paper aims at making recommendations about the current old-age protection model.Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyzes the current four pillars of old age protection. A comprehensive literature review was conducted covering relevant government reports, academics' journal papers and nongovernmental organizations' reports concerning the development of old age protection system from 1965 to the present.FindingsThe poverty rate of elderly residents was approximately 44.5% between 2009 and 2018, indicating that the four pillars of old-age protection had been unable to alleviate poverty in the aging population. The development of the current four pillars is attributed to a residual welfare system, the effectiveness of which is further dependent on familial dependence or welfare financialization. However, the reliability of familial dependence is affected by the declining coresidence rate and low fertility rate, whereas welfare financialization not only predominately favors financial institutions but also exacerbates income polarization. Therefore, the University of Hong Kong (2014) introduced an additional pillar of noncontributory social pension and assistance, which generated a contentious debate. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government initiated a public engagement exercise on retirement protection in 2015 to assess public opinion on old-age protection. These consultation exercises were met with broad public disappointment because of the explicit reservations imposed by the government on the proposals.Practical implicationsAlthough the government's resistant attitude can be attributed to the residual welfare system, pension reform needs to be urgently implemented at three levels, namely strengthening of each pillar, emphasis on the pillar's interrelatedness and introduction of the first pillar.Originality/valueThe poverty of the elderly population is serious in Hong Kong. It is important to solve the deep-seated problems faced by the current old-age protection model. Hence, it comes a critical time to design a sustainable old-age protection model despite the heated discussion on the establishment of a central provident fund and pension system among officials since 1960s.
Asian Education and Development Studies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 2, 2023
Keywords: Five pillars of old-age protection; Poverty of the elderly population; Residual welfare system; Welfare financialization
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.