Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Collins, Edward Maydew, Ira Weiss (1997)
Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty yearsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 24
Wei Jiang, A. Stark (2012)
Dividends, Research and Development Expenditures, and the Value Relevance of Book Value for UK Loss-Making FirmsFinancial Accounting eJournal
Anne Jeny, Rucsandra Moldovan (2020)
Accounting for Intangible Assets—Insights from Meta-Analysis of R&D Research
P. Joos, G. Plesko (2004)
Valuing Loss FirmsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Carla Hayn (1995)
The information content of lossesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 20
M. Darrough, Jianming Ye (2006)
Valuation of loss firms in a knowledge-based economyReview of Accounting Studies, 12
D. Burgstahler, Ilia Dichev (1996)
Earnings, Adaptation, and Equity Value, 72
The Accounting Review, 80
Lingping Kong, Huaitao Su (2019)
On the Market Reaction to Capitalization of R&D Expenditures: Evidence from ChiNextEmerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57
Afroditi Papadaki, Georgia Siougle (2007)
Value relevance of price, earnings and book values in the Athens Stock ExchangeManagerial Finance, 33
Gerald Feltham, James Ohlson (1999)
Residual Earnings Valuation With Risk and Stochastic Interest RatesThe Accounting Review, 74
Laurel Franzen, S. Radhakrishnan (2009)
The value relevance of R&D across profit and loss firmsJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28
Cécile Carpentier, Frédéric Romon, Jean-Marc Suret (2016)
Are Investors Rational When Valuing Loss Firms?Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19
D. Collins, Morton Pincus, Hong Xie (1999)
Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of EquityAccounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association, 74
The British Accounting Review, 45
B. Lev (2018)
Ending the Accounting-for-Intangibles Status QuoEuropean Accounting Review, 28
Kamran Ahmed, H. Falk (2006)
The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from AustraliaJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25
Fengyi Lin, Chung-Min Wu, Tzu-Yi Fang, Jheng-Ci Wun (2014)
The relations among accounting conservatism, institutional investors and earnings manipulationEconomic Modelling, 37
Anne Cazavan-Jeny, Thomas Jeanjean (2006)
The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approachEuropean Accounting Review, 15
P. Kumari, C. Mishra (2019)
Value relevance of R&D reporting in India: significance of intangible intensityJournal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
Journal of Corporate Finance, 64
Ronald Zhao (2002)
Relative Value Relevance of R&D Reporting: An International ComparisonIRPN: Innovation & Accounting (Topic)
P. Kumari, C. Mishra (2021)
The impact of intangible intensity on relevance of R&D information: evidence from IndiaJournal of Applied Accounting Research
Stewart Jones (2011)
Does the Capitalization of Intangible Assets Increase the Predictability of Corporate FailureAccounting Horizons, 25
G. Kwon (2009)
The Value Relevance of Book Values, Earnings and Cash flows: Evidence from South KoreaInternational Journal of Biometrics, 4
Mustafa Ciftci, Nan Zhou (2014)
Capitalizing R&D expenses versus disclosing intangible informationReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 46
Mustafa Ciftci, M. Darrough, R. Mashruwala (2014)
Value Relevance of Accounting Information for Intangible-Intensive Industries and the Impact of Scale: The US EvidenceEuropean Accounting Review, 23
D. Dhaliwal, S. Kaplan, Rick Laux, Eric Weisbrod (2012)
The Information Content of Tax Expense for Firms Reporting LossesPolitical Economy: Taxation
Kai Wu, Seiwai Lai (2020)
Intangible Intensity and Stock Price Crash RiskFinancial Economics Negative Results eJournal
James Ohlson (1995)
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*Contemporary Accounting Research, 11
Anne Cazavan-Jeny, Thomas Jeanjean, P. Joos (2011)
Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R&D accounting in FranceJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30
F. Bancel, Usha Mittoo (2014)
The Gap between the Theory and Practice of Corporate Valuation: Survey of European ExpertsWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Applied Corporate Finance
Laurel Franzen, K. Cornaggia, Timothy Simin (2006)
Measuring Distress Risk: The Effect of R&D IntensityERN: Experimental Economics (Topic)
International Journal of Business and Management, 4
Journal of Accounting Research, 51
Dennis Chambers, R. Jennings, R. Thompson (2002)
Excess Returns to R&D-Intensive FirmsReview of Accounting Studies, 7
Mary Barth, W. Beaver, John Hand, W. Landsman (2004)
Accruals, Accounting-Based Valuation Models, and the Prediction of Equity ValuesJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20
Hyesoo Ko, Yanghon Chung, C. Woo (2020)
Choice of R&D strategy and asymmetric cost behaviourTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33
Bong-ho Han, David Manry (2004)
The value-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from KoreaThe International Journal of Accounting, 39
Amitabh Dugar, Jacob Pozharny (2020)
Equity Investing in the Age of IntangiblesFinancial Analysts Journal, 77
C. Jan, Jane Ou (2012)
Negative-Book-Value Firms and Their ValuationAccounting Horizons, 26
Mustafa Ciftci, M. Darrough (2015)
What Explains the Valuation Difference between Intangible‐Intensive Profit and Loss Firms?CGN: Disclosure & Accounting Decisions (Topic)
This study aims to investigate how the intangible intensive nature of firms affects the value relevance of earnings and the book value of equity between profit- and loss-reporting firms. The study also examines how firms’ intangible intensity affects the value relevance of R&D outlays between profit- and loss-reporting firms.Design/methodology/approachAn empirical analysis based on Ohlson’s (1995) framework is used. A total of 54,421 firm-year observations of Indian listed firms from financial years 1992–2016 constitute the study sample.FindingsThe findings suggest that the difference in the value relevance of earnings and the book value of equity between profit- and loss-reporting firms is more significant in non-intangible intensive firms than in intangible firms. Specifically, earnings are more value relevant in profit-reporting and non-intangible intensive firms, whereas book value of equity is more value relevant in loss-reporting and intangible intensive firms. The results also suggest that the difference in the incremental value relevance of R&D information between profit- and loss-making firms is higher in intangible intensive firms than in non-intangible intensive firms.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study can help managers, standard-setters and investors make effective decisions.Originality/valueThis study offers insights into the impact of intangible intensity on the value relevance of aggregated and disaggregated accounting information between profit- and loss-making firms in institutional settings where capitalization of R&D expenditures is allowed.
Accounting Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 24, 2023
Keywords: Value relevance; R&D information; Profit- and loss-making firms; Earnings; Book value
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.