Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Computational opposition analysis using word embeddings: A method for strategising resonant informal argument

Computational opposition analysis using word embeddings: A method for strategising resonant... In informal argument, an essential step is to ask what will “resonate” with a particular audience and hence persuade. Marketers, for example, may recommend a certain colour for a new soda can because it “pops” on Instagram; politicians may “fine-tune” diction for different social demographics. This paper engages the need to strategise for such resonance by offering a method for automating opposition analysis (OA), a technique from semiotics used in marketing and literary analysis to plot objects of interest on oppositional axes. Central to our computational approach is a reframing of texts as proxies for thought and opposition as the product of oscillation in thought in response to those proxies, a model to which the contextual similarity information contained in word embeddings is relevant. We illustrate our approach with an analysis of texts on gun control from ProCon.org, implementing a three-step method to: 1) identify relatively prominent signifiers; 2) rank possible opposition pairs on prominence and contextual similarity scores; and 3) derive plot values for proxies on opposition pair axes. The results are discussed in terms of strategies for informal argument that might be derived by those on each side of gun control. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Argument & Computation IOS Press

Computational opposition analysis using word embeddings: A method for strategising resonant informal argument

Shackell, Cameron; Sitbon, Laurianne
Argument & Computation , Volume 10 (3): 17 – Jan 29, 2020
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ios-press/computational-opposition-analysis-using-word-embeddings-a-method-for-8j1stiqJ0g

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
IOS Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 © 2019 – IOS Press and the authors.
ISSN
1946-2166
eISSN
1946-2174
DOI
10.3233/AAC-190467
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In informal argument, an essential step is to ask what will “resonate” with a particular audience and hence persuade. Marketers, for example, may recommend a certain colour for a new soda can because it “pops” on Instagram; politicians may “fine-tune” diction for different social demographics. This paper engages the need to strategise for such resonance by offering a method for automating opposition analysis (OA), a technique from semiotics used in marketing and literary analysis to plot objects of interest on oppositional axes. Central to our computational approach is a reframing of texts as proxies for thought and opposition as the product of oscillation in thought in response to those proxies, a model to which the contextual similarity information contained in word embeddings is relevant. We illustrate our approach with an analysis of texts on gun control from ProCon.org, implementing a three-step method to: 1) identify relatively prominent signifiers; 2) rank possible opposition pairs on prominence and contextual similarity scores; and 3) derive plot values for proxies on opposition pair axes. The results are discussed in terms of strategies for informal argument that might be derived by those on each side of gun control.

Journal

Argument & Computation – IOS Press

Published: Jan 29, 2020

There are no references for this article.