Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Martínez-Val, E. Pérez, C. Cuerno, J. Palacin (2013)
Cost-range trade-off of intermediate stop operations of long-range transport airplanesProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 227
D. Poll (2011)
On the effect of stage length on the efficiency of air transportThe Aeronautical Journal (1968), 115
R. Henderson, J. Martins, Ruben Perez (2012)
Aircraft conceptual design for optimal environmental performanceThe Aeronautical Journal (1968), 116
N. Currey (1988)
Aircraft landing gear design : principles and practices
Christine Taylor, O. Weck (2007)
Coupled Vehicle Design and Network Flow Optimization for Air Transportation SystemsJournal of Aircraft, 44
R. Nangia (2006)
Efficiency parameters for modern commercial aircraftThe Aeronautical Journal (1968), 110
O. Samoylovitch, D. Strelets (2000)
Determination of the Oswald efficiency factor at the aeroplane design preliminary stageAircraft Design, 3
M. Maier (1996)
Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems, 6
O. Gur, W. Mason, J. Schetz (2009)
Full Configuration Drag EstimationJournal of Aircraft, 47
David Lee, G. Pitari, V. Grewe, K. Gierens, J. Penner, A. Petzold, M. Prather, U. Schumann, A. Bais, T. Berntsen, D. Iachetti, L. Lim, R. Sausen (2009)
Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: AviationAtmospheric Environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 44
R. Nangia (2007)
‘Greener’ civil aviation using air-to-air refuelling – relating aircraft design efficiency and tanker offload efficiencyThe Aeronautical Journal (1968), 111
A. Ning, Tristan Flanzer, I. Kroo (2010)
Aerodynamic Performance of Extended Formation FlightJournal of Aircraft, 48
R. McRoberts, J. Early, F. Morscheck, M. Price, B. Korn (2015)
Tanker Mission Implication on a Civil Aerial Refuelling Transport System’s Benefit EvaluationJournal of Aircraft, 52
P. Jansen, Ruben Perez (2016)
Coupled Optimization of Aircraft Families and Fleet Allocation for Multiple MarketsJournal of Aircraft, 53
R. Nangia (2006)
Operations and aircraft design towards greener civil aviation using air-to-air refuellingThe Aeronautical Journal (1968), 110
S. Powers (1981)
Critical Field Length Calculations for Preliminary DesignJournal of Aircraft, 18
Hernando Jimenez, Holger Pfaender, D. Mavris (2012)
Fuel Burn and CO2 System-Wide Assessment of Environmentally Responsible Aviation TechnologiesJournal of Aircraft, 49
M. Bartel, T. Young (2008)
Simplified Thrust and Fuel Consumption Models for Modern Two-Shaft Turbofan EnginesJournal of Aircraft, 45
S. Langhans, F. Linke, Peter Nolte, V. Gollnick (2013)
System Analysis for an Intermediate Stop Operations Concept on Long Range RoutesJournal of Aircraft, 50
Ruben Perez, P. Jansen, J. Martins (2011)
pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimizationStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 45
Muharrem Mane, W. Crossley, Antonius Nusawardhana (2007)
System-of-Systems Inspired Aircraft Sizing and Airline Resource Allocation via DecompositionJournal of Aircraft, 44
Innovative solutions from aircraft manufacturers and radical changes from operations are required to maintain airlines’ economic viability while simultaneously mitigating current pressures on the air transportation system due to increasing passenger demand, cost of fuel, and greater emphasis on environmental efficiency. For long–range routes in particular, a possible solution to mitigate these concerns is to design aircraft for shorter ranges and operate them using intermediate stops or stages. This paper explores the tradeoffs in design and operations that arise from a coupled multi-objective optimization approach to aircraft design and staging allocation as applied to a real-world route network. The tighter integration between the design of the aircraft and its assignment results in smaller and lighter optimal aircraft configurations which shift route operations to higher levels of efficiency by aggregating the effect of changes in design range, route staging and cruise Mach numbers. Fuel burn and operating cost savings up to 38% and 22% respectively are possible, as compared to a reference aircraft of similar technology-level. Significant decrease in fuel burn comes at a penalty of increased flight time up to 12% of total time. However, some of the optimal configurations provide significant reduction in fuel burn and cost with negligible time penalties. Possible adverse environmental effects arising from staging could be mitigated by the configuration changes found for the optimum staging aircraft and their significant reductions in fuel burn.
Journal of Aerospace Operations – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.