Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Emmanuel Hadoux, A. Hunter (2016)
Computationally Viable Handling of Beliefs in Arguments for Persuasion2016 IEEE 28th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)
S. Gaggl, Thomas Linsbichler, M. Maratea, S. Woltran (2018)
Summary Report of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of ArgumentationAI Mag., 39
Tuomas Lehto, H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2010)
Persuasive Features in Six Weight Loss Websites: A Qualitative Evaluation
D. Gabbay, O. Rodrigues (2012)
A Numerical Approach to the Merging of Argumentation Networks
A. Hunter, Matthias Thimm (2014)
Probabilistic Argument Graphs for Argumentation Lotteries
Iyad Rahwan, Mohammed Madakkatel, Jean‐François Bonnefon, R. Awan, Sherief Abdallah (2010)
Behavioral Experiments for Assessing the Abstract Argumentation Semantics of ReinstatementCognitive science, 34 8
C. Cayrol, M. Lagasquie-Schiex (2005)
On the Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
Sylwia Polberg, A. Hunter (2017)
Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: Supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approachesArXiv, abs/1707.09324
Matthias Thimm (2012)
A Probabilistic Semantics for abstract Argumentation
Xiuyi Fan, Francesca Toni (2011)
Assumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues
A. Cawsey, F. Grasso, Ray Jones (1999)
A Conversational Model for Health Promotion on the World Wide Web
L. Goldberg (1993)
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.The American psychologist, 48 1
(2005)
Arguments and Arguing: The Products and Process of Human Decision Making
L. Moench (2016)
The Logic Of Real Arguments
R. Cialdini (1993)
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
R. Thomas, J. Masthoff, N. Oren (2017)
Adapting Healthy Eating Messages to Personality
K. Sycara (1989)
Argumentation: Planning Other Agents' Plans
Régis Riveret, H. Prakken, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor (2008)
Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation
A. Hunter, Matthias Thimm (2017)
Probabilistic Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation FrameworksJ. Artif. Intell. Res., 59
Leila Amgoud, J. Ben-Naim (2013)
Ranking-Based Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
C. Cayrol, M. Lagasquie-Schiex (2011)
Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: Towards a better understanding
D. Walton, E. Krabbe (1995)
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
M. Zwinderman, A. Shirzad, Xinyv Ma, Prina Bajracharya, Hans Sandberg, M. Kaptein (2012)
Phone Row: A Smartphone Game Designed to Persuade People to Engage in Moderate-Intensity Physical Activity
J. Olson (1992)
Psychological Barriers to Behavior Change: How to indentify the barriers that inhibit change.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 38
P. McBurney, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2005)
Persuasive political argument
A. Hunter (2013)
Modelling Uncertainty in Persuasion
S. Britten (1985)
Planning for persuasion.Medicine and war, 1 1
A. Hunter (2008)
Reasoning about the Appropriateness of Proponents for Arguments
H. Prakken (2005)
Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for ArgumentationJ. Log. Comput., 15
Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus (2016)
Providing Arguments in Discussions on the Basis of the Prediction of Human Argumentative BehaviorACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 6
A. Hunter (2012)
Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation
Robert Gula (2002)
Nonsense: Red Herrings, Straw Men and Sacred Cows: How We Abuse Logic in Our Everyday Language
Leila Amgoud, H. Prade (2005)
Formal handling of threats and rewards in a negotiation dialogue
Elise Bonzon, N. Maudet (2011)
On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion
D. Walton, C. Reed, Fabrizio Macagno (2008)
Argumentation Schemes
P. McBurney, R. Eijk, S. Parsons, Leila Amgoud (2003)
A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase NegotiationsAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 7
R. Calvo, S. D’Mello (2010)
Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their ApplicationsIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1
F. Dignum, B. Dunin-Keplicz, R. Verbrugge (2000)
Dialogue in Team Formation
Trevor Bench-Capon, S. Doutre, P. Dunne (2007)
Audiences in argumentation frameworksArtif. Intell., 171
P. Baroni, Federico Cerutti, M. Giacomin, G. Guida (2018)
AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacksArXiv, abs/1810.04886
F. Grasso (2003)
Rhetorical Coding of Health Promotion Dialogues
Elizabeth Black, A. Coles, C. Hampson (2017)
Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Antonomous Agents and Multiagent Sytems
W. Lonner, J. Berry, G. Hofstede (1980)
Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
A. Hunter, Matthias Thimm (2016)
Optimization of dialectical outcomes in dialogical argumentationInt. J. Approx. Reason., 78
M. Koit (2016)
Influencing the Beliefs of a Dialogue Partner
John Vargheese, S. Sripada, J. Masthoff, N. Oren, Patricia Schofield, Vicki Hanson (2013)
Persuasive dialogue for older adults: promoting and encouraging social interactionCHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Emmanuel Hadoux, A. Beynier, N. Maudet, Paul Weng, A. Hunter (2015)
Optimization of Probabilistic Argumentation with Markov Decision Models
Iyad Rahwan, K. Larson (2008)
Mechanism design for abstract argumentation
Mohamed Benlamine, Maher Chaouachi, S. Villata, Elena Cabrio, C. Frasson, Fabien Gandon (2015)
Emotions in Argumentation: an Empirical Evaluation
A. Hunter (2016)
Persuasion Dialogues via Restricted Interfaces Using Probabilistic Argumentation
J. Prochaska, W. Velicer (1997)
The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior ChangeAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 12
Hengfei Li, N. Oren, T. Norman (2011)
Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks
Elizabeth Black, A. Hunter (2015)
Reasons and Options for Updating an Opponent Model in Persuasion Dialogues
H. Simons, Jean Jones (2011)
Persuasion in Society
P. Dung, P. Thang (2010)
Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution
H. Kelman, A. Eagly (1965)
ATTITUDE TOWARD THE COMMUNICATOR, PERCEPTION OF COMMUNICATION CONTENT, AND ATTITUDE CHANGE.Journal of personality and social psychology, 1
Günther Charwat, W. Dvořák, S. Gaggl, J. Wallner, S. Woltran (2015)
Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation – A surveyArtificial Intelligence, 220
N. Oren, T. Norman (2009)
Arguing Using Opponent Models
S. Modgil, H. Prakken (2014)
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorialArgument Comput., 5
Martin Caminada, D. Gabbay (2009)
A Logical Account of Formal ArgumentationStudia Logica, 93
H. Prakken (2006)
Formal systems for persuasion dialogueThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 21
P. Besnard, A. Hunter (2007)
Elements of Argumentation
A. Hunter (2014)
Probabilistic Strategies in Dialogical Argumentation
Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni, M. Aurisicchio, P. Baroni (2016)
Discontinuity-Free Decision Support with Quantitative Argumentation Debates
D. Walton (1989)
Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
B. Fogg (1998)
Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directionsProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
J. Hornikx, U. Hahn (2012)
Reasoning and argumentation: Towards an integrated psychology of argumentationThinking & Reasoning, 18
A. Hunter, Nico Potyka (2017)
Updating Probabilistic Epistemic States in Persuasion Dialogues
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
F. Cerutti, N. Tintarev, N. Oren (2014)
Formal Arguments, Preferences, and Natural Language Interfaces to Humans: an Empirical Evaluation
P. McBurney, S. Parsons (2002)
Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous AgentsJournal of Logic, Language and Information, 11
Michal Kosinskihttps://www.semanticscholar.org/me/account, D. Stillwell, T. Graepel (2013)
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behaviorProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110
(2009)
The Political Speechwriter’s Companion: A Guide for Writers and Speakers
S. Coste-Marquis, S. Konieczny, Jean-Guy Mailly, P. Marquis (2014)
A Translation-Based Approach for Revision of Argumentation Frameworks
A. Hunter, Matthias Thimm (2014)
Probabilistic Argumentation with Incomplete Information
S. Modgil (2009)
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworksArtif. Intell., 173
H. Prakken, Régis Riveret, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor (2008)
Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game-Theoretical InvestigationLaw & Literature eJournal
Esteban Guerrero, J. Nieves, H. Lindgren (2016)
An activity-centric argumentation framework for assistive technology aimed at improving healthArgument Comput., 7
A. Hunter (2013)
A probabilistic approach to modelling uncertain logical argumentsInt. J. Approx. Reason., 54
S. Lukin, P. Anand, M. Walker, S. Whittaker (2017)
Argument Strength is in the Eye of the Beholder: Audience Effects in PersuasionArXiv, abs/1708.09085
J. Devereux, C. Reed (2009)
Strategic Argumentation in Rigorous Persuasion Dialogue
J. Mackenzie (1979)
Question-begging in non-cumulative systemsJournal of Philosophical Logic, 8
Marco Lippi, Paolo Torroni (2018)
Argumentation MiningSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
Iyad Rahwan, K. Larson (2008)
Pareto Optimality in Abstract Argumentation
V. Gold (1987)
Covert Advocacy: Reflections on the Use of Psychological Persuasion Techniques in the CourtroomNorth Carolina Law Review, 65
P. Besnard, A. Hunter (2014)
Constructing argument graphs with deductive arguments: a tutorialArgument Comput., 5
P. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. McBurney, S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge (2011)
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity resultsArtif. Intell., 175
Bilyana Martinovski, W. Mao (2009)
Emotion as an Argumentation Engine: Modeling the Role of Emotion in NegotiationGroup Decision and Negotiation, 18
S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, Leila Amgoud (2003)
Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent DialoguesJ. Log. Comput., 13
Francesca Toni (2014)
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentationArgument Comput., 5
G. Maio, G. Haddock (2015)
The Psychology of Attitudes and Attitude Change
J. Swindell, A. McGuire, S. Halpern (2010)
Beneficent Persuasion: Techniques and Ethical Guidelines to Improve Patients’ DecisionsThe Annals of Family Medicine, 8
A. Hunter (2004)
Making Argumentation More Believable
A. Hunter (2015)
Modelling the Persuadee in Asymmetric Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion
A. Eagly (1974)
Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29
N. Oren, Katie Atkinson, Hengfei Li (2012)
Group Persuasion through Uncertain Audience Modelling
John Vargheese, S. Sripada, J. Masthoff, N. Oren (2016)
Persuasive Strategies for Encouraging Social Interaction for Older AdultsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32
Pierre Bisquert, Madalina Croitoru, Florence Bannay (2015)
Four Ways to Evaluate Arguments According to Agent Engagement
S. Coste-Marquis, S. Konieczny, Jean-Guy Mailly, P. Marquis (2014)
On the Revision of Argumentation Systems: Minimal Change of Arguments Statuses
Sylwia Polberg, A. Hunter, Matthias Thimm (2017)
Belief in Attacks in Epistemic Probabilistic Argumentation
P. Matt, Francesca Toni (2008)
A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
Pierre Bisquert, C. Cayrol, Florence Bannay, M. Lagasquie-Schiex (2013)
Enforcement in Argumentation Is a Kind of Update
D. Walton (2006)
Fundamentals of critical argumentation
Emmanuel Hadoux, A. Hunter (2017)
Strategic Sequences of Arguments for Persuasion Using Decision Trees
P. Dung (1995)
On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person GamesArtif. Intell., 77
A. Hunter (2016)
Two Dimensional Uncertainty in Persuadee Modelling in Argumentation
Trevor Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson, A. Chorley (2005)
Persuasion and Value in Legal ArgumentJ. Log. Comput., 15
Ringo Baumann, G. Brewka (2010)
Expanding Argumentation Frameworks: Enforcing and Monotonicity Results
F. Grasso, A. Cawsey, Ray Jones (2000)
Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutritionInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 53
Shiu-li Huang, Fu-Ren Lin (2007)
The design and evaluation of an intelligent sales agent for online persuasion and negotiationElectron. Commer. Res. Appl., 6
Trevor Bench-Capon (2012)
Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
Pierre Andrews, S. Manandhar, M. Boni (2008)
Argumentative Human Computer Dialogue for Automated Persuasion
Elise Bonzon, Jérôme Delobelle, S. Konieczny, N. Maudet (2016)
A Comparative Study of Ranking-Based Semantics for Abstract ArgumentationArXiv, abs/1602.01059
(2014)
Weight Management: Lifestyle Services for Overweight or Obese Adults. Number 53 in Public health guideline. NICE
A. Hunter, Sylwia Polberg (2017)
Empirical Methods for Modelling Persuadees in Dialogical Argumentation2017 IEEE 29th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)
J. Richardson (2007)
Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis
Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09) A Characterisation of Strategy-Proofness for Grounded Argumentation Semantics
S. Coste-Marquis, S. Konieczny, Jean-Guy Mailly, P. Marquis (2015)
Extension Enforcement in Abstract Argumentation as an Optimization Problem
Farid Nouioua, V. Risch (2011)
Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities
H. Hoeken, Rian Timmers, P. Schellens (2012)
Arguing about desirable consequences: What constitutes a convincing argument?Thinking & Reasoning, 18
(1992)
Psychological barriers to behaviour change
Christos Hadjinikolis, Yiannis Siantos, S. Modgil, Elizabeth Black, P. McBurney (2013)
Opponent Modelling in Persuasion Dialogues
Leila Amgoud, S. Parsons, N. Maudet (2000)
Arguments, Dialogue, and Negotiation
Martyn Lloyd-Kelly, A. Wyner (2011)
Arguing about Emotion
C. Cayrol, Florence Bannay, M. Lagasquie-Schiex (2010)
Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an ArgumentJ. Artif. Intell. Res., 38
A. García, Guillermo Simari (2014)
Defeasible logic programming: DeLP-servers, contextual queries, and explanations for answersArgument Comput., 5
Hien Nguyen, J. Masthoff, Peter Edwards (2007)
Persuasive Effects of Embodied Conversational Agent Teams
S. Langrial, H. Oinas-Kukkonen (2012)
Less Fizzy Drinks: A Multi-method Study of Persuasive Reminders
Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus (2016)
Strategical Argumentative Agent for Human Persuasion
K. Kaipainen, E. Mattila, Marja-Liisa Kinnunen, I. Korhonen (2010)
Facilitation of Goal-Setting and Follow-Up in an Internet Intervention for Health and Wellness
Rolando Medellin-Gasque, Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon (2012)
Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation about Plans
Xiuyi Fan, Francesca Toni (2012)
Mechanism Design for Argumentation-based Persuasion
Matthias Thimm (2014)
Strategic Argumentation in Multi-Agent SystemsKI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 28
Ringo Baumann (2012)
What Does it Take to Enforce an Argument? Minimal Change in abstract Argumentation
Ariel Rosenfeld, Sarit Kraus (2015)
Providing Arguments in Discussions Based on the Prediction of Human Argumentative Behavior
Trevor Bench-Capon (2003)
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation FrameworksJ. Log. Comput., 13
Martin Diller, Adrian Haret, Thomas Linsbichler, Stefan Rümmele, S. Woltran (2015)
An Extension-Based Approach to Belief Revision in Abstract ArgumentationInt. J. Approx. Reason., 93
Bart Verheij (2017)
Proof with and without probabilities - Correct evidential reasoning with presumptive arguments, coherent hypotheses and degrees of uncertaintyArtif. Intell. Law, 25
A. Hunter (2004)
Towards higher impact argumentation
Bart Verheij (2017)
Proof with and without probabilitiesArtificial Intelligence and Law, 25
C. Hamblin (2008)
Mathematical models of dialogue1Theoria, 37
Elizabeth Black, A. Coles, S. Bernardini (2014)
Automated Planning of Simple Persuasion Dialogues
S. Timmer, J. Meyer, H. Prakken, S. Renooij, Bart Verheij (2017)
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networksInt. J. Approx. Reason., 80
P. Baroni, Martin Caminada, M. Giacomin (2011)
An introduction to argumentation semanticsThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 26
Elizabeth Black, A. Hunter (2009)
An inquiry dialogue systemAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 19
Tjitze Rienstra (2012)
Towards a Probabilistic Dung-style Argumentation System
Tjitze Rienstra, Matthias Thimm, N. Oren (2013)
Opponent Models with Uncertainty for Strategic Argumentation
Leila Amgoud, C. Cayrol (2002)
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation FrameworksJournal of Automated Reasoning, 29
Hien Nguyen, J. Masthoff (2008)
Designing Persuasive Dialogue Systems: Using Argumentation with Care
A. Osley (1995)
Persuading the people
T. Roosevelt (1982)
Health psychology.Nursing times, 78 10
F. Grasso (2007)
Exciting Avocados and Dull Pears Combining Behavioural and Argumentative Theory for Producing Effective Advice
Persuasion is an activity that involves one party trying to induce another party to believe something or to do something. It is an important and multifaceted human facility. Obviously, sales and marketing is heavily dependent on persuasion. But many other activities involve persuasion such as a doctor persuading a patient to drink less alcohol, a road safety expert persuading drivers to not text while driving, or an online safety expert persuading users of social media sites to not reveal too much personal information online. As computing becomes involved in every sphere of life, so too is persuasion a target for applying computer-based solutions. An automated persuasion system (APS) is a system that can engage in a dialogue with a user (the persuadee) in order to persuade the persuadee to do (or not do) some action or to believe (or not believe) something. To do this, an APS aims to use convincing arguments in order to persuade the persuadee. Computational persuasion is the study of formal models of dialogues involving arguments and counterarguments, of user models, and strategies, for APSs. A promising application area for computational persuasion is in behaviour change. Within healthcare organizations, government agencies, and non-governmental agencies, there is much interest in changing behaviour of particular groups of people away from actions that are harmful to themselves and/or to others around them.
Argument & Computation – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.