Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
the ordinary practice of the port of Calcutta in doing those acts which had to be done by the charterer to enable the vessel to become an "arrived ship", and the burden of proving that the charterer was in breach of that term lay on the owners. The learned Judge then went on to state that the arbitrators had not set out the test which they had applied, and the case would therefore be remitted to the arbitrators with a direction that they should reconsider the issues in the light of the above stated implied term ; and make whatever appeared to them to be the appropriate findings of fact, against the background of that implied term so that it could be seen from the special case how their ultimate conclusion as to liability or non-liability had been reached. The learned Judge made the following very important remarks in the course of his judgement : In considering whether or not facts found in a special case support the conclusion reached by the arbitrators the Court can only draw such inferences from the facts found as must inevitably flow from them. It is not permissible for the Court to draw
Asian International Arbitration Journal – Kluwer Law International
Published: Aug 1, 1973
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.