Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reference Without Legal Representation

Reference Without Legal Representation REFERENCE WITHOUT LEGAL REPRESENTATION At the third public lecture on Arbitration, in the Institute 1972 Autumn series, a talk was given on Hearings Without Legal Representation, together with a Demonstration Hearing and a talk on the Travel Scheme. The initial talk was by W. James, Esq., C.B.E., F.R.I.C.S. (Past President) and is reproduced below: I am only the first act tonight and am well aware that I am on a strict time limit. I shall therefore only be able to mention a few selected aspects of this subject and must leave out much that I should have wished to saygiving you great opportunities to fill in gaps at question time (if there is time for it). Let me first refer back to two of the points, made by Mr. Waters in the first of this series of talks, when he compared small disputes with large ones. These were that small case Arbitrations: (a) were no different from large case Arbitrations in principlethe difference being that the parties were not usually legally represented and therefore points of law were generally left to the Arbi­ trator (who can seek guidance from the high court if he considers this necessary), (b) were http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asian International Arbitration Journal Kluwer Law International

Reference Without Legal Representation

Asian International Arbitration Journal , Volume 40 (2): 6 – Apr 1, 1973
Download PDF
6 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/kluwer-law-international/reference-without-legal-representation-qNrkl6fi63

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Kluwer Law International
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands
ISSN
1574-3330
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

REFERENCE WITHOUT LEGAL REPRESENTATION At the third public lecture on Arbitration, in the Institute 1972 Autumn series, a talk was given on Hearings Without Legal Representation, together with a Demonstration Hearing and a talk on the Travel Scheme. The initial talk was by W. James, Esq., C.B.E., F.R.I.C.S. (Past President) and is reproduced below: I am only the first act tonight and am well aware that I am on a strict time limit. I shall therefore only be able to mention a few selected aspects of this subject and must leave out much that I should have wished to saygiving you great opportunities to fill in gaps at question time (if there is time for it). Let me first refer back to two of the points, made by Mr. Waters in the first of this series of talks, when he compared small disputes with large ones. These were that small case Arbitrations: (a) were no different from large case Arbitrations in principlethe difference being that the parties were not usually legally represented and therefore points of law were generally left to the Arbi­ trator (who can seek guidance from the high court if he considers this necessary), (b) were

Journal

Asian International Arbitration Journal – Kluwer Law International

Published: Apr 1, 1973

There are no references for this article.