Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

RAWLS, INEQUALITY, AND WELFARE-STATE CAPITALISM

RAWLS, INEQUALITY, AND WELFARE-STATE CAPITALISM AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND EQUALITY | ISSUE 3 | 2023 AMERICAN JOURNAL of LAW and EQUALITY Andrew Koppelman* John Rawls offers a powerful framework for judging the astounding levels of inequality that modern capitalism has engendered. He is not, however, a good guide to that frame- work’s implications, because his own response was ill-informed about how the economy operates today. Rawls has often been taken to be a defender of welfare-state capitalism. In fact, he believed capitalism (with or without a welfare state) is inherently unjust. The only morally acceptable economic systems are democratic socialism (in which “the means of production are owned by society” )or “property-owning democracy,” a market economy in which government continually intervenes to ensure widespread dispersal of the ownership of capital. He built these claims on a description of contemporary American capitalism that is almost completely false and a remarkably optimistic account of the alternatives. That is unfortunate, because his framework is one of our most useful tools for identifying the pa- thologies of inequality. Rawls’s misunderstanding of the effects of free markets leads many to reject his phi- losophy outright. Actually it merely shows that he got some facts wrong. His liberalism shows http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Law and Equality MIT Press

RAWLS, INEQUALITY, AND WELFARE-STATE CAPITALISM

Loading next page...
 
/lp/mit-press/rawls-inequality-and-welfare-state-capitalism-KfMepKzA0c

References (44)

Publisher
MIT Press
Copyright
© 2023 Andrew Koppelman. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND).
eISSN
2694-5711
DOI
10.1162/ajle_a_00057
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND EQUALITY | ISSUE 3 | 2023 AMERICAN JOURNAL of LAW and EQUALITY Andrew Koppelman* John Rawls offers a powerful framework for judging the astounding levels of inequality that modern capitalism has engendered. He is not, however, a good guide to that frame- work’s implications, because his own response was ill-informed about how the economy operates today. Rawls has often been taken to be a defender of welfare-state capitalism. In fact, he believed capitalism (with or without a welfare state) is inherently unjust. The only morally acceptable economic systems are democratic socialism (in which “the means of production are owned by society” )or “property-owning democracy,” a market economy in which government continually intervenes to ensure widespread dispersal of the ownership of capital. He built these claims on a description of contemporary American capitalism that is almost completely false and a remarkably optimistic account of the alternatives. That is unfortunate, because his framework is one of our most useful tools for identifying the pa- thologies of inequality. Rawls’s misunderstanding of the effects of free markets leads many to reject his phi- losophy outright. Actually it merely shows that he got some facts wrong. His liberalism shows

Journal

American Journal of Law and EqualityMIT Press

Published: Sep 15, 2023

There are no references for this article.