Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung Disease by Influencing Bacterial Composition

Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung Disease by... Article Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung Disease by Influencing Bacterial Composition 1 1 2 2 Rosalinda Monroy Del Toro , Ryan Incrocci , Olivia Negris , Shaina McGrath 1 , and Julie A. Swartzendruber * Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA Biomedical Sciences Program, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA * Correspondence: jswart@midwestern.edu Abstract: Probiotics are an attractive target for reducing the incidence of allergic disease. Bacillus subtilis is a gut-associated probiotic bacteria that can suppress allergic lung disease; however, it is not clear for how long this protection lasts. We exposed C57Bl/6 mice to B. subtilis via oral gavage and challenged them with intranasal house-dust mite for up to 8 weeks. We found that B. subtilis treatment was able to provide protection from eosinophil infiltration of the airways for 3 weeks. This loss of protection correlated with an increase in the eosinophil chemoattractant CCL24. Additionally, we demonstrate that B. subtilis treatment altered the bacterial composition by increasing the phylum Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicorbiota. The phylum Verrucomicorbiota was reduced in B. subtilis-treated mice at 8 weeks when protection was lost. These results support B. subtilis as a prophylactic for preventing the production of allergic lung disease and highlights that protection can last up to 3 weeks. This work also expands our understanding of how B. subtilis mediates protection and that in addition to modifying the immune system it is also altering the host microbiota. Citation: Monroy Del Toro, R.; Keywords: probiotic; allergy; house-dust mite; eosinophils; host microbiota Incrocci, R.; Negris, O.; McGrath, S.; Swartzendruber, J.A. Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung 1. Introduction Disease by Influencing Bacterial The number of people with allergies has been on the rise over the last half-century, and Composition. Allergies 2023, 3, 1–10. currently 20% of the population in developed countries has allergies [1]. The rise in allergic https://doi.org/10.3390/ disease correlates with an increasingly sterile living environment and reduced exposure to allergies3010001 bacteria, contributing to inappropriate responses by the immune system to non-infectious Academic Editor: Pierre Rougé or innocuous antigens [2]. The rise in allergic disease and reduced early-life exposure to microbes is reflected in the changing bacterial composition of infants. Specifically, children Received: 28 July 2022 born via caesarean section have reduced bacterial diversity and reduced levels of Lactobacil- Revised: 8 September 2022 Accepted: 15 December 2022 lus and Bifidobacterium, and therefore increased risk of developing allergic disease [3,4]. Published: 23 December 2022 Probiotic intervention is being pursued as a method to restore this bacterial dysbiosis. Both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium haven been shown to reduce the development of allergic disease in mice when administered prophylactically [5,6]. The mechanism of Lactobacillus protection is strain-specific and includes induction of T-regulatory cells, as Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. well as modulation of dendritic cell function [7–9]. Although Lactobacillus is generally Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. safe, it requires frequent dosing for efficacy, which poses a risk for immunocompromised This article is an open access article patients and can lead to bacteremia [10]. distributed under the terms and We and others have identified that Bacillus subtilis, a Gram-positive bacterium com- conditions of the Creative Commons monly found in soil and the gastrointestinal tract, can prevent allergic lung inflamma- Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// tion [11,12]. B. subtilis has demonstrated efficacy in protecting from gastrointestinal in- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ flammation, sepsis, and allergic lung disease with infrequent dosing in acute models of 4.0/). Allergies 2023, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/allergies3010001 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/allergies Allergies 2023, 3 2 disease [13,14]. B. subtilis has been demonstrated to reduce pathogenic bacteria via quorum sensing with implications for reducing infections [15]. In addition, we know that B. subtilis production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) is critical for its immune suppression [13,16]. Previ- ous work has established that B. subtilis-derived EPS induces an anti-inflammatory response by suppressing dendritic-cell function and inducing anti-inflammatory macrophages, as well as via NF-kb and STAT6 pathways [11,12,16]. The process of allergic sensitization is initiated by antigen-presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC), which capture and internalize allergens and are essential for HDM-induced type-2 inflammation [17]. Allergen presentation by DCs drives the proliferation of allergen-specific Th2 cells and activation of B cells [18,19]. Eosinophils are recruited to the airway following Th2-produced cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 stimulating a variety of cells to produce the eosinophil chemoattractants CCL11 and CCL24 [20,21]. Allergen-specific IgE is produced by B cells after an encounter with IL-4-producing Th2 cells and is dependent on the STAT6 pathway [19]. Our previous work identified that B. subtilis treatment can protect mice from HDM- induced eosinophilia, but we did not determine whether B. subtilis influenced eosinophil chemokines or allergen-specific immunoglobulin production. Additionally, we do not know how long B. subtilis-mediated protection lasts. To determine how long B. subtilis can protect mice from an allergic response, we utilized repeated HDM challenges and found that B. subtilis protects from HDM-induced eosinophilia for 3 weeks. We further deter- mined B. subtilis reduced levels of CCL24, with no impact on immunoglobulin production. Interestingly, we found that B. subtilis exposure altered the composition of bacteria during periods of protection compared to no-treatment mice. These results support the long-term protective effects of B. subtilis exposure, further identify the effects of B. subtilis on the immune response, and point to additional impacts of B. subtilis exposure on the microbiota. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Mice Male and female C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and bred in house at Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, in a specific pathogen-free facility. All animal protocols were approved by the Midwestern University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 2.2. Allergic Lung Disease Model C57B1/6 mice, age 6–10 weeks old, were treated through oral gavage with 10ˆ9 wild- type B. subtilis spores, 10ˆ9 epsH spores unable to produce exopolysaccharide (EPS), or sterile PBS as a negative control. B. subtilis and epsH spores were generated via exhaustion, as previously described [22]. After 24 h, mice were sensitized intranasally with 100 g of house-dust mites (HDM, D. pteronyssinus XPB82S3A2.5, Stallergenes Greer, Lenoir, NC, USA) in 100 L of sterile PBS. After 5 days of initial treatment, mice were once again treated orally with B. subtilis spores as described above. On days 6–9, mice that were in the “week 1” group were sensitized intranasally with 25 g HDM in 100 L sterile PBS. These mice were euthanized on day 12. Bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) was collected by flushing lungs with 0.8 mL BAL fluid (10% FCS, 1 mM EDTA, 1X PBS). Blood was collected through cardiac puncture and spun down at 8000 rpm for 8 min, and serum was collected and frozen for ELISA assays. Lungs were excised and fixed in formalin for 24 h. BALF was counted using a hemocytometer to determine total cells/mL, cytospun onto slides, and assessed for percent eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages using Diff-Quick staining and counting 100 cells per slide (Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL, USA). The total cells/mL of each cell type was determined by calculating the number of cells/mL based on the percent of each cell type. On days 13–16, mice that were in the “week 2” group were sensitized intranasally with 25 g HDM in 100 L sterile PBS. On day 19, these mice were euthanized, and tissues were collected as described above. Intranasal sensitizations Allergies 2023, 3 3 were repeated for groups “week 3” through “week 8,” mice were euthanized, and tissues were collected. 2.3. ELISA CCL24: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of biotinylated anti-mouse CCL24 in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight (Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA). The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and BALF was added to the wells along with antibody standard recombinant murine CCL24 (Peprotech). After three washes, the plates were treated with secondary antibody Biotin anti-murine CCL24 (Peprotech) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells, and once there was a color change the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. HDM-specific IgE and IgG1: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of HDM (5 g/L) in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and serum was added to the wells. After subsequent washes, the plates were treated with secondary antibody Biotin anti-mouse IgE or IgG1 and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells and once there was a color change, the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. Total IgE and IgG1: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of rat anti-mouse IgE or anti-mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and serum was added to the wells along with antibody standards (BD Biosciences). The plates were incubated at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells and once there was a color change, the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. 2.4. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Fecal samples were collected from mice during the allergic lung inflammation model on days 1 and 5 (before o.g. treatment) and the day of euthanization across all treatment groups into sterile tubes and stored at –80 °C. DNA extraction was performed on thawed fecal samples using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit (Omega BioTek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer ’s instructions. The extracted DNA was sent to Argonne Na- tional Laboratory for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq instrument. The sequences obtained were processed through Illumina-utils software to demultiplex, align, merge, and quality filter the sequence data. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database version 138. Alpha- and beta-diversity was determined using QIIM31.9.1 and QIIME2 to generate PCoA ordinations. 2.5. Statistics All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 4 Allergies 2023, 3 4 3.1. Bacillus Subtilis Protection from House-Dust Mite-Induced Eosinophilia Wanes after 3 Weeks 3. Results To determine how long B. subtilis can protect against eosinophilia, we challenged 3.1. Bacillus Subtilis Protection from House-Dust Mite-Induced Eosinophilia Wanes after 3 Weeks mice with HDM for up to 8 weeks after B. subtilis exposure, as shown in Figure 1A. We To determine how long B. subtilis can protect against eosinophilia, we challenged mice measured eosinophils in the bronchial alveolar fluid lavage (BALF) and found that at 4 with HDM for up to 8 weeks after B. subtilis exposure, as shown in Figure 1A. We measured weeks mice receiving B. subtilis were no longer protected from eosinophilia (Figure 1B,C). eosinophils in the bronchial alveolar fluid lavage (BALF) and found that at 4 weeks mice Interestingly, the protection from weeks 2 and 3 seemed to be independent of exopolysac- receiving B. subtilis were no longer protected from eosinophilia (Figure 1B,C). Interestingly, charide production, as demonstrated by the reduced eosinophils in mice treated with the protection from weeks 2 and 3 seemed to be independent of exopolysaccharide pro- epsH spores that were unable to produce EPS (Figure 1B,C). These results expand on our duction, as demonstrated by the reduced eosinophils in mice treated with epsH spores previous kno that were unable wledge th to produce at EPS EPS is impor (Figur taen1 t B,C). in the These B. subtilis results -mediate expand d protec on ourtion previous from eo- knowledge that EPS is important in the B. subtilis-mediated protection from eosinophilia sinophilia at week 1 [11]. The reduction in eosinophils was due to a shift to macrophages at week 1 [11]. The reduction in eosinophils was due to a shift to macrophages being being the primary cell in the BALF, as shown in Figure 2A,D. Additionally, B. subtilis the primary cell in the BALF, as shown in Figure 2A,D. Additionally, B. subtilis treatment treatment did significantly alter neutrophil infiltration and had a moderate impact on did significantly alter neutrophil infiltration and had a moderate impact on lymphocyte lymphocyte recruitment (Figure 2B,C,E,F). recruitment (Figure 2B,C,E,F). Figure 1. Eosinophil infiltrate in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Timeline for B. subtilis and HDM treatment in C57Bl/6 mice. (B,C) Quantification of eosinophils from BALF cytospun and Figure 1. Eosinophil infiltrate in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Timeline for B. subtilis and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in (A). Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 3–10). HDM treatment in C57Bl/6 mice. (B,C) Quantification of eosinophils from BALF cytospun and stained * p < 0.5 with , *** Di p < ffQu 0.005, ick,and as sho **** wp n in < 0.001 (A). Data by Student represent t test mea compar n ± SEM ed repre to HDM sentative alone ( in n the = 3–same 10). * p < 0.5, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. week. HDM, house-dust mite; WT, wild-type; epsH spores, B. subtilis spores unable to produce HDM, house-dust mite; WT, wild-type; epsHspores, B. subtilis spores unable to produce exopolysac- exopolysaccharide. charide. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independent of EPS production, but EPS was involved in the CCL24 suppression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. subtilis- mediated protection was influenced by a reduction in IgG1 or IgE production, we measured Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 5 Allergies 2023, 3 5 Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 5 serum levels of total and HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE. We found that B. subtilis treatment had no effect on HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE or total IgG1 and IgE levels (Figure 4A–D). Figure 2. Cellular infiltrate of BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A–F) Quantification of BALF cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independen Figuret o 2. Cellular f EPS prod infiltrateuction, but E of BALF followingP B. S was subtilis tr involved in eatment. (A–F) Quantification the CCL24 sup- of BALF Figure 2. Cellular infiltrate of BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A–F) Quantification of BALF cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent pression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student mean ± SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independent of EPS production, but EPS was involved in the CCL24 sup- pression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF super- natant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF superna- *** p < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed tant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and *** p compared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed com- 3.4. Bacillus Fecal Composition Is Similar across Mice Regardless of Treatment with B. subtilis pared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. Spores Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF superna- To determine whether the waning protection was due to higher levels of B. subtilis tant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and *** p 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production following exposure that dwindled over time, we collected fecal pellets from mice over < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed com- the course of 8 weeks to assess bacterial composition. We found that mice receiving no pared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response B. subtilis and HDM alone and mice receiving WT B. subtilis spores had very similar levels and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. Allergies 2023, 3 6 Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of Bacillus strains identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (Figure 5A). Of note, mice subtilis-mediated protection was influenced by a reduction in IgG1 or IgE production, we treated with epsH B. subtilis spores had elevated levels of Bacillus during the first week measured serum levels of total and HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE. We found that B. subtilis following spore administration (Figure 5A). This elevated Bacillus seemed to be temporarily treatment had no effect on HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE or total IgG1 and IgE levels (Figure detrimental, as evidenced by the elevated eosinophilia in epsH B. subtilis-treated mice 4A–D). during week 1 and protection in weeks 2–3 (Figure 1B). Figure 4. Immunoglobulin levels in serum following B. subtilis treatment. (A–D) Quantification Figure 4. Immunoglobulin levels in serum following B. subtilis treatment. (A–D) Quantification of of serum immunoglobulin levels by ELISA. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 2–4). serum immunoglobulin levels by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 2–4). One- One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed for each im- way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed for each immuno- munoglobulin and no statistical differences were found. globulin and no statistical differences were found. 3.5. Bacterial Composition Clustering Correlates with Protection from Eosinophilia 3.4. Bacillus Fecal Composition Is Similar across Mice Regardless of Treatment with B. subtilis This early difference induced between epsH and WT B. subtilis was also observed when Spores comparing all bacterial compositions, as evidenced by all three treatment groups clustering To determine whether the waning protection was due to higher levels of B. subtilis separately early in treatment and epsH spores clustering more closely with HDM alone following exposure that dwindled over time, we collected fecal pellets from mice over the during the time of elevated eosinophilia. However, at day 5 epsH spore treatment changed course of 8 weeks to assess bacterial composition. We found that mice receiving no B. its clustering to be more closely related to WT B. subtilis spores, correlating to a shift to subtilis and HDM alone and mice receiving WT B. subtilis spores had very similar levels protection from eosinophilia (Figure 5B). Additionally, we found that bacteria phylum was of Bacillus strains identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (Figure 5A). Of note, mice altered by B. subtilis treatment, specifically increased levels of the phylum Bacteroidetes, as treated with epsH B. subtilis spores had elevated levels of Bacillus during the first week well as elevated Verrucomicorbiota early in disease during B. subtilis-mediated protection following spore administration (Figure 5A). This elevated Bacillus seemed to be temporar- (Figure 5C). In addition to elevated Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicorbiota in B. subtilis ily detrimental, as evidenced by the elevated eosinophilia in epsH B. subtilis-treated mice treatment, there was reduced representation by the phylum Firmicutes (Figure 5C). during week 1 and protection in weeks 2–3 (Figure 1B). Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 7 Allergies 2023, 3 7 Figure 5. Bacterial composition following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Quantification of Bacillus strains Figure 5. Bacterial composition following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Quantification of Bacillus strains in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing from fecal pellets of mice treated according to the experimental in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing from fecal pellets of mice treated according to the experimental design in Figure 1A. (B) PCoA plot between HDM alone, HDM + WT spores, and HDM + epsH design in Figure 1A. (B) PCoA plot between HDM alone, HDM + WT spores, and HDM + epsH spores spores on a forced axis for treatment. (C) Taxonomic bar plot indicating relative abundance of bac- on a forced axis for treatment. (C) Taxonomic bar plot indicating relative abundance of bacterial terial phylums. phylums. 3.5. Bacterial Composition Clustering Correlates with Protection from Eosinophilia 4. Discussion This early difference induced between epsH and WT B. subtilis was also observed This work expands our understanding of the duration of protection provided by B. when comparing all bacterial compositions, as evidenced by all three treatment groups subtilis and offers further evidence for its appeal as a probiotic for preventing allergic clustering separately early in treatment and epsH spores clustering more closely with disease. Unlike other probiotics that require early and frequent dosing, B. subtilis is effective HDM alone during the time of elevated eosinophilia. However, at day 5 epsH spore treat- at 6 weeks of age and last for up to 3 weeks. For example, many of the experiments ment changed its clustering to be more closely related to WT B. subtilis spores, correlating investigating the efficacy of the probiotic lactobacillus utilize daily dosing [5]. B. subtilis to a shift to protection from eosinophilia (Figure 5B). Additionally, we found that bacteria provides a novel bacterium to prevent allergic disease with infrequent dosing required. phylum was altered by B. subtilis treatment, specifically increased levels of the phylum Current treatments for allergic disease focus on improving symptoms while rarely Bacteroidetes, as well as elevated Verrucomicorbiota early in disease during B. subtilis- addressing the mechanism of disease [23]. Treatments that do address the mechanism, such mediated protection (Figure 5C). In addition to elevated Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicor- as desensitization studies, involve high patient risk for anaphylactic reactions, are time biota in B. subtilis treatment, there was reduced representation by the phylum Firmicutes consuming and expensive, and have only moderate efficacy [24]. We identified B. subtilis as a candidate for(Fi trg eating ure 5C aller ). gic disease and further characterized B. subtilis-derived EPS as a bacterial-derived molecule that elicits immunosuppression. Specifically, we found that exposure to B. subtilis WT spores resulted in reduced production of eosinophilia at week 1, whereas epsH spore treatment did not show a significant decrease in eosinophils at this timepoint. Additionally, we found that exposure to B. subtilis EPS-producing WT spores resulted in reduced production of the eosinophil chemokine CCL24 at week 1, whereas Allergies 2023, 3 8 EPS was not required for B. subtilis treatment to reduce CCL24 levels or eosinophilia at week 3. CCL24 is produced by many cell types in response to IL-4, including airway epithelial cells, airway smooth-muscle cells, vascular endothelial cells, macrophages, and eosinophils [25–27]. We suspect that the mechanism of B. subtilis WT spores and epsH spores reducing CCL24 at different type points is due to suppression of CCL24 production by different cell types. There is growing evidence that the resident microbiota influences susceptibility to al- lergic disease [28]. Although we and others have identified the immunosuppressive effects of B. subtilis and have investigated the effects on immune-cell function and activation, no one had previously investigated the impact on the host microbiota. We found that treatment with B. subtilis spores influences the bacterial composition of treated mice. Interestingly we found minimal change in Bacillus strains observed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, which is in line with previous reports showing that B. subtilis spore treatment does not establish elevated colonization, with CFUs/gm feces declining rapidly and reaching the limit of detection around 4 days post exposure [29]. Our work highlights the importance of host microbiota on allergic disease and sheds light on how probiotics can influence bacterial composition. Although allergies are increasing in prevalence and contribute to reductions in quality of life, as well as significant health-care costs [30], we are pursuing a novel method for reducing the incidence of disease using an abundant, cheap, and safe probiotic, Bacillus subtilis. Future work is needed to determine whether B. subtilis can serve as a treatment option after the onset of disease or whether its effects are limited to prophylactic treatment. Additionally, previous work has identified that B. subtilis-derived EPS immune suppression is TLR4 dependent [13], and future studies are needed to determine the requirement for TLR4 in protection from allergic airway inflammation. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, J.A.S.; methodology, R.M.D.T., R.I., O.N. and S.M.; data analysis, R.M.D.T., R.I., O.N., S.M. and J.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.D.T. and J.A.S.; writing—review and editing, R.M.D.T., R.I. and J.A.S.; funding acquisition, J.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding but was supported by Midwestern University Start-Up Funds and the Midwestern University Core Facility, including the Core Facility Outsourcing Fund, all awarded to J.A.S. Institutional Review Board Statement: The animal-study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL (protocol code #2754, approval date 27 November 2018). Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge and thank the Argonne Sequencing Team for performing the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and Nathaniel Hubert for analysis of the 16S rRNA sequencing data. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. Platts-Mills, T. The allergy epidemics: 1870–2010. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 3–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Akdis, M. Healthy immune response to allergens: T regulatory cells and more. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 738–744. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Galazzo, G.; van Best, N.; Bervoets, L.; Dapaah, I.O.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Hornef, M.W.; Consortium, G.-M.; Lau, S.; Hamelmann, E.; Penders, J. Development of the Microbiota and Associations With Birth Mode, Diet, and Atopic Disorders in a Longitudinal Analysis of Stool Samples, Collected From Infancy Through Early Childhood. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1584–1596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Johansson, M.A.; Sjogren, Y.M.; Persson, J.O.; Nilsson, C.; Sverremark-Ekstrom, E. Early colonization with a group of Lactobacilli decreases the risk for allergy at five years of age despite allergic heredity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23031. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Allergies 2023, 3 9 5. Jang, S.O.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, M.J.; Kwon, J.W.; Seo, J.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Yu, J.; Hong, S.J. Asthma Prevention by + + + Lactobacillus Rhamnosus in a Mouse Model is Associated With CD4 CD25 Foxp3 T Cells. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2012, 4, 150–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 6. Raftis, E.J.; Delday, M.I.; Cowie, P.; McCluskey, S.M.; Singh, M.D.; Ettorre, A.; Mulder, I.E. Bifidobacterium breve MRx0004 protects against airway inflammation in a severe asthma model by suppressing both neutrophil and eosinophil lung infiltration. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12024. [CrossRef] 7. Aoki-Yoshida, A.; Yamada, K.; Hachimura, S.; Sashihara, T.; Ikegami, S.; Shimizu, M.; Totsuka, M. Enhancement of Oral Tolerance Induction in DO11.10 Mice by Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2809 via Increase of Effector Regulatory T Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158643. [CrossRef] 8. Smelt, M.J.; de Haan, B.J.; Bron, P.A.; van Swam, I.; Meijerink, M.; Wells, J.M.; Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. L. Plantarum, L. salivarius, and L. lactis attenuate Th2 responses and increase Treg frequencies in healthy mice in a strain dependent manner. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47244. [CrossRef] 9. Tang, C.; Kamiya, T.; Liu, Y.; Kadoki, M.; Kakuta, S.; Oshima, K.; Hattori, M.; Takeshita, K.; Kanai, T.; Saijo, S.; et al. Inhibition of Dectin-1 Signaling Ameliorates Colitis by Inducing Lactobacillus-Mediated Regulatory T Cell Expansion in the Intestine. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 183–197. [CrossRef] 10. Sherid, M.; Samo, S.; Sulaiman, S.; Husein, H.; Sifuentes, H.; Sridhar, S. Liver abscess and bacteremia caused by lactobacillus: Role of probiotics? Case report and review of the literature. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016, 16, 138. [CrossRef] 11. Swartzendruber, J.A.; Incrocci, R.W.; Wolf, S.A.; Jung, A.; Knight, K.L. Bacillus subtilis exopolysaccharide prevents allergic eosinophilia. Allergy 2019, 74, 819–821. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Zhang, L.; Yi, H. An exopolysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis alleviates airway inflammatory responses via the NF-kappaB and STAT6 pathways in asthmatic mice. Biosci. Rep. 2022, 42, BSR20212461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. Jones, S.E.; Paynich, M.L.; Kearns, D.B.; Knight, K.L. Protection from Intestinal Inflammation by Bacterial Exopolysaccharides. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 4813–4820. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Paik, W.; Alonzo, F., 3rd; Knight, K.L. Probiotic Exopolysaccharide Protects against Systemic Staphylococcus aureus Infection, Inducing Dual-Functioning Macrophages That Restrict Bacterial Growth and Limit Inflammation. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, e00791-18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Piewngam, P.; Zheng, Y.; Nguyen, T.H.; Dickey, S.W.; Joo, H.S.; Villaruz, A.E.; Glose, K.A.; Fisher, E.L.; Hunt, R.L.; Li, B.; et al. Pathogen elimination by probiotic Bacillus via signalling interference. Nature 2018, 562, 532–537. [CrossRef] 16. Paynich, M.L.; Jones-Burrage, S.E.; Knight, K.L. Exopolysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis Induces Anti-Inflammatory M2 Macrophages That Prevent T Cell-Mediated Disease. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2689–2698. [CrossRef] 17. Hammad, H.; Plantinga, M.; Deswarte, K.; Pouliot, P.; Willart, M.A.; Kool, M.; Muskens, F.; Lambrecht, B.N. Inflammatory dendritic cells—Not basophils—Are necessary and sufficient for induction of Th2 immunity to inhaled house dust mite allergen. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2097–2111. [CrossRef] 18. Havenith, C.E.; Breedijk, A.J.; Betjes, M.G.; Calame, W.; Beelen, R.H.; Hoefsmit, E.C. T cell priming in situ by intratracheally instilled antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1993, 8, 319–324. [CrossRef] 19. Shimoda, K.; van Deursen, J.; Sangster, M.Y.; Sarawar, S.R.; Carson, R.T.; Tripp, R.A.; Chu, C.; Quelle, F.W.; Nosaka, T.; Vignali, D.A.; et al. Lack of IL-4-induced Th2 response and IgE class switching in mice with disrupted Stat6 gene. Nature 1996, 380, 630–633. [CrossRef] 20. Heiman, A.S.; Abonyo, B.O.; Darling-Reed, S.F.; Alexander, M.S. Cytokine-stimulated human lung alveolar epithelial cells release eotaxin-2 (CCL24) and eotaxin-3 (CCL26). J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2005, 25, 82–91. [CrossRef] 21. Pope, S.M.; Zimmermann, N.; Stringer, K.F.; Karow, M.L.; Rothenberg, M.E. The eotaxin chemokines and CCR3 are fundamental regulators of allergen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 5341–5350. [CrossRef] 22. D’Arienzo, R.; Maurano, F.; Mazzarella, G.; Luongo, D.; Stefanile, R.; Ricca, E.; Rossi, M. Bacillus subtilis spores reduce susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium-mediated enteropathy in a mouse model. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 891–897. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Chung, K.F. Precision medicine in asthma: Linking phenotypes to targeted treatments. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 4–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Virkud, Y.V.; Burks, A.W.; Steele, P.H.; Edwards, L.J.; Berglund, J.P.; Jones, S.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Perry, T.T.; Pesek, R.D.; Vickery, B.P. Novel baseline predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 882–888.e5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Conroy, D.M.; Williams, T.J. Eotaxin and the attraction of eosinophils to the asthmatic lung. Respir. Res. 2001, 2, 150–156. [CrossRef] 26. Humbles, A.A.; Conroy, D.M.; Marleau, S.; Rankin, S.M.; Palframan, R.T.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Wells, T.N.; Li, D.; Jeffery, P.K.; Griffiths-Johnson, D.A.; et al. Kinetics of eotaxin generation and its relationship to eosinophil accumulation in allergic airways disease: Analysis in a guinea pig model in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 601–612. [CrossRef] 27. Ying, S.; Robinson, D.S.; Meng, Q.; Rottman, J.; Kennedy, R.; Ringler, D.J.; Mackay, C.R.; Daugherty, B.L.; Springer, M.S.; Durham, S.R.; et al. Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 mRNA and protein in atopic asthma. Association with airway hyperresponsiveness and predominant co-localization of eotaxin mRNA to bronchial epithelial and endothelial cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997, 27, 3507–3516. [CrossRef] Allergies 2023, 3 10 28. Feehley, T.; Plunkett, C.H.; Bao, R.; Choi Hong, S.M.; Culleen, E.; Belda-Ferre, P.; Campbell, E.; Aitoro, R.; Nocerino, R.; Paparo, L.; et al. Healthy infants harbor intestinal bacteria that protect against food allergy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 448–453. [CrossRef] 29. Jones, S.E.; Knight, K.L. Bacillus subtilis-Mediated Protection from Citrobacter rodentium-Associated Enteric Disease Requires espH and Functional Flagella. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 710–719. [CrossRef] 30. Pawankar, R.; Canonica, G.W.; Holgate, S.T.; Lockey, R.F.; Blaiss, M. World Allergy Organization (WAO) white book on allergy. Nihon Shoni Arerugi Gakkaishi Jpn. J. Pediatr. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 25, 341. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Allergies Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung Disease by Influencing Bacterial Composition

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/multidisciplinary-digital-publishing-institute/bacillus-subtilis-provides-long-term-protection-in-a-murine-model-of-CzZwsBLUKs

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Copyright
© 1996-2022 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated Disclaimer Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
ISSN
2313-5786
DOI
10.3390/allergies3010001
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Article Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung Disease by Influencing Bacterial Composition 1 1 2 2 Rosalinda Monroy Del Toro , Ryan Incrocci , Olivia Negris , Shaina McGrath 1 , and Julie A. Swartzendruber * Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA Biomedical Sciences Program, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515, USA * Correspondence: jswart@midwestern.edu Abstract: Probiotics are an attractive target for reducing the incidence of allergic disease. Bacillus subtilis is a gut-associated probiotic bacteria that can suppress allergic lung disease; however, it is not clear for how long this protection lasts. We exposed C57Bl/6 mice to B. subtilis via oral gavage and challenged them with intranasal house-dust mite for up to 8 weeks. We found that B. subtilis treatment was able to provide protection from eosinophil infiltration of the airways for 3 weeks. This loss of protection correlated with an increase in the eosinophil chemoattractant CCL24. Additionally, we demonstrate that B. subtilis treatment altered the bacterial composition by increasing the phylum Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicorbiota. The phylum Verrucomicorbiota was reduced in B. subtilis-treated mice at 8 weeks when protection was lost. These results support B. subtilis as a prophylactic for preventing the production of allergic lung disease and highlights that protection can last up to 3 weeks. This work also expands our understanding of how B. subtilis mediates protection and that in addition to modifying the immune system it is also altering the host microbiota. Citation: Monroy Del Toro, R.; Keywords: probiotic; allergy; house-dust mite; eosinophils; host microbiota Incrocci, R.; Negris, O.; McGrath, S.; Swartzendruber, J.A. Bacillus subtilis Provides Long-Term Protection in a Murine Model of Allergic Lung 1. Introduction Disease by Influencing Bacterial The number of people with allergies has been on the rise over the last half-century, and Composition. Allergies 2023, 3, 1–10. currently 20% of the population in developed countries has allergies [1]. The rise in allergic https://doi.org/10.3390/ disease correlates with an increasingly sterile living environment and reduced exposure to allergies3010001 bacteria, contributing to inappropriate responses by the immune system to non-infectious Academic Editor: Pierre Rougé or innocuous antigens [2]. The rise in allergic disease and reduced early-life exposure to microbes is reflected in the changing bacterial composition of infants. Specifically, children Received: 28 July 2022 born via caesarean section have reduced bacterial diversity and reduced levels of Lactobacil- Revised: 8 September 2022 Accepted: 15 December 2022 lus and Bifidobacterium, and therefore increased risk of developing allergic disease [3,4]. Published: 23 December 2022 Probiotic intervention is being pursued as a method to restore this bacterial dysbiosis. Both Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium haven been shown to reduce the development of allergic disease in mice when administered prophylactically [5,6]. The mechanism of Lactobacillus protection is strain-specific and includes induction of T-regulatory cells, as Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. well as modulation of dendritic cell function [7–9]. Although Lactobacillus is generally Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. safe, it requires frequent dosing for efficacy, which poses a risk for immunocompromised This article is an open access article patients and can lead to bacteremia [10]. distributed under the terms and We and others have identified that Bacillus subtilis, a Gram-positive bacterium com- conditions of the Creative Commons monly found in soil and the gastrointestinal tract, can prevent allergic lung inflamma- Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// tion [11,12]. B. subtilis has demonstrated efficacy in protecting from gastrointestinal in- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ flammation, sepsis, and allergic lung disease with infrequent dosing in acute models of 4.0/). Allergies 2023, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/allergies3010001 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/allergies Allergies 2023, 3 2 disease [13,14]. B. subtilis has been demonstrated to reduce pathogenic bacteria via quorum sensing with implications for reducing infections [15]. In addition, we know that B. subtilis production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) is critical for its immune suppression [13,16]. Previ- ous work has established that B. subtilis-derived EPS induces an anti-inflammatory response by suppressing dendritic-cell function and inducing anti-inflammatory macrophages, as well as via NF-kb and STAT6 pathways [11,12,16]. The process of allergic sensitization is initiated by antigen-presenting cells (APC), such as dendritic cells (DC), which capture and internalize allergens and are essential for HDM-induced type-2 inflammation [17]. Allergen presentation by DCs drives the proliferation of allergen-specific Th2 cells and activation of B cells [18,19]. Eosinophils are recruited to the airway following Th2-produced cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 stimulating a variety of cells to produce the eosinophil chemoattractants CCL11 and CCL24 [20,21]. Allergen-specific IgE is produced by B cells after an encounter with IL-4-producing Th2 cells and is dependent on the STAT6 pathway [19]. Our previous work identified that B. subtilis treatment can protect mice from HDM- induced eosinophilia, but we did not determine whether B. subtilis influenced eosinophil chemokines or allergen-specific immunoglobulin production. Additionally, we do not know how long B. subtilis-mediated protection lasts. To determine how long B. subtilis can protect mice from an allergic response, we utilized repeated HDM challenges and found that B. subtilis protects from HDM-induced eosinophilia for 3 weeks. We further deter- mined B. subtilis reduced levels of CCL24, with no impact on immunoglobulin production. Interestingly, we found that B. subtilis exposure altered the composition of bacteria during periods of protection compared to no-treatment mice. These results support the long-term protective effects of B. subtilis exposure, further identify the effects of B. subtilis on the immune response, and point to additional impacts of B. subtilis exposure on the microbiota. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Mice Male and female C57Bl/6 mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and bred in house at Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, in a specific pathogen-free facility. All animal protocols were approved by the Midwestern University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. 2.2. Allergic Lung Disease Model C57B1/6 mice, age 6–10 weeks old, were treated through oral gavage with 10ˆ9 wild- type B. subtilis spores, 10ˆ9 epsH spores unable to produce exopolysaccharide (EPS), or sterile PBS as a negative control. B. subtilis and epsH spores were generated via exhaustion, as previously described [22]. After 24 h, mice were sensitized intranasally with 100 g of house-dust mites (HDM, D. pteronyssinus XPB82S3A2.5, Stallergenes Greer, Lenoir, NC, USA) in 100 L of sterile PBS. After 5 days of initial treatment, mice were once again treated orally with B. subtilis spores as described above. On days 6–9, mice that were in the “week 1” group were sensitized intranasally with 25 g HDM in 100 L sterile PBS. These mice were euthanized on day 12. Bronchial alveolar lavage (BAL) was collected by flushing lungs with 0.8 mL BAL fluid (10% FCS, 1 mM EDTA, 1X PBS). Blood was collected through cardiac puncture and spun down at 8000 rpm for 8 min, and serum was collected and frozen for ELISA assays. Lungs were excised and fixed in formalin for 24 h. BALF was counted using a hemocytometer to determine total cells/mL, cytospun onto slides, and assessed for percent eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages using Diff-Quick staining and counting 100 cells per slide (Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL, USA). The total cells/mL of each cell type was determined by calculating the number of cells/mL based on the percent of each cell type. On days 13–16, mice that were in the “week 2” group were sensitized intranasally with 25 g HDM in 100 L sterile PBS. On day 19, these mice were euthanized, and tissues were collected as described above. Intranasal sensitizations Allergies 2023, 3 3 were repeated for groups “week 3” through “week 8,” mice were euthanized, and tissues were collected. 2.3. ELISA CCL24: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of biotinylated anti-mouse CCL24 in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight (Peprotech, Cranbury, NJ, USA). The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and BALF was added to the wells along with antibody standard recombinant murine CCL24 (Peprotech). After three washes, the plates were treated with secondary antibody Biotin anti-murine CCL24 (Peprotech) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells, and once there was a color change the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. HDM-specific IgE and IgG1: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of HDM (5 g/L) in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and serum was added to the wells. After subsequent washes, the plates were treated with secondary antibody Biotin anti-mouse IgE or IgG1 and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells and once there was a color change, the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. Total IgE and IgG1: 96-well plates were coated with 100 L of rat anti-mouse IgE or anti-mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) in carbonate buffer at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed three times with PBST buffer (1xPBS, 0.05% Tween 20) and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed again and serum was added to the wells along with antibody standards (BD Biosciences). The plates were incubated at 4 C overnight. The plates were washed and stained with HRP-avidin (Biolegend) in the dark at room temperature for 1 h. After washing the plates, TMB substrate solution (Biolegend) was added to the wells and once there was a color change, the plates were measured on a MultiSkan™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at OD 405 nm. 2.4. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing Fecal samples were collected from mice during the allergic lung inflammation model on days 1 and 5 (before o.g. treatment) and the day of euthanization across all treatment groups into sterile tubes and stored at –80 °C. DNA extraction was performed on thawed fecal samples using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA Kit (Omega BioTek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer ’s instructions. The extracted DNA was sent to Argonne Na- tional Laboratory for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq instrument. The sequences obtained were processed through Illumina-utils software to demultiplex, align, merge, and quality filter the sequence data. Taxonomy was assigned using the SILVA database version 138. Alpha- and beta-diversity was determined using QIIM31.9.1 and QIIME2 to generate PCoA ordinations. 2.5. Statistics All analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism Software (La Jolla, CA, USA). Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 4 Allergies 2023, 3 4 3.1. Bacillus Subtilis Protection from House-Dust Mite-Induced Eosinophilia Wanes after 3 Weeks 3. Results To determine how long B. subtilis can protect against eosinophilia, we challenged 3.1. Bacillus Subtilis Protection from House-Dust Mite-Induced Eosinophilia Wanes after 3 Weeks mice with HDM for up to 8 weeks after B. subtilis exposure, as shown in Figure 1A. We To determine how long B. subtilis can protect against eosinophilia, we challenged mice measured eosinophils in the bronchial alveolar fluid lavage (BALF) and found that at 4 with HDM for up to 8 weeks after B. subtilis exposure, as shown in Figure 1A. We measured weeks mice receiving B. subtilis were no longer protected from eosinophilia (Figure 1B,C). eosinophils in the bronchial alveolar fluid lavage (BALF) and found that at 4 weeks mice Interestingly, the protection from weeks 2 and 3 seemed to be independent of exopolysac- receiving B. subtilis were no longer protected from eosinophilia (Figure 1B,C). Interestingly, charide production, as demonstrated by the reduced eosinophils in mice treated with the protection from weeks 2 and 3 seemed to be independent of exopolysaccharide pro- epsH spores that were unable to produce EPS (Figure 1B,C). These results expand on our duction, as demonstrated by the reduced eosinophils in mice treated with epsH spores previous kno that were unable wledge th to produce at EPS EPS is impor (Figur taen1 t B,C). in the These B. subtilis results -mediate expand d protec on ourtion previous from eo- knowledge that EPS is important in the B. subtilis-mediated protection from eosinophilia sinophilia at week 1 [11]. The reduction in eosinophils was due to a shift to macrophages at week 1 [11]. The reduction in eosinophils was due to a shift to macrophages being being the primary cell in the BALF, as shown in Figure 2A,D. Additionally, B. subtilis the primary cell in the BALF, as shown in Figure 2A,D. Additionally, B. subtilis treatment treatment did significantly alter neutrophil infiltration and had a moderate impact on did significantly alter neutrophil infiltration and had a moderate impact on lymphocyte lymphocyte recruitment (Figure 2B,C,E,F). recruitment (Figure 2B,C,E,F). Figure 1. Eosinophil infiltrate in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Timeline for B. subtilis and HDM treatment in C57Bl/6 mice. (B,C) Quantification of eosinophils from BALF cytospun and Figure 1. Eosinophil infiltrate in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Timeline for B. subtilis and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in (A). Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 3–10). HDM treatment in C57Bl/6 mice. (B,C) Quantification of eosinophils from BALF cytospun and stained * p < 0.5 with , *** Di p < ffQu 0.005, ick,and as sho **** wp n in < 0.001 (A). Data by Student represent t test mea compar n ± SEM ed repre to HDM sentative alone ( in n the = 3–same 10). * p < 0.5, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. week. HDM, house-dust mite; WT, wild-type; epsH spores, B. subtilis spores unable to produce HDM, house-dust mite; WT, wild-type; epsHspores, B. subtilis spores unable to produce exopolysac- exopolysaccharide. charide. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independent of EPS production, but EPS was involved in the CCL24 suppression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. subtilis- mediated protection was influenced by a reduction in IgG1 or IgE production, we measured Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 5 Allergies 2023, 3 5 Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 5 serum levels of total and HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE. We found that B. subtilis treatment had no effect on HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE or total IgG1 and IgE levels (Figure 4A–D). Figure 2. Cellular infiltrate of BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A–F) Quantification of BALF cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independen Figuret o 2. Cellular f EPS prod infiltrateuction, but E of BALF followingP B. S was subtilis tr involved in eatment. (A–F) Quantification the CCL24 sup- of BALF Figure 2. Cellular infiltrate of BALF following B. subtilis treatment. (A–F) Quantification of BALF cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent pression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). cells from cytospin and stained with DiffQuick, as shown in timeline from Figure 1A. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student mean ± SEM representative (n = 5–10). * p < 0.5, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, and **** p < 0.001 by Student t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. t test compared to HDM alone in the same week. 3.2. CCL24 Production Is Suppressed by Bacillus subtilis Treatment for 3 Weeks Eosinophil recruitment to the lung is driven in part by the production and presence of the chemokine CCL24. We measured the levels of CCL24 in the BALF each week for 4 weeks according to the B. subtilis exposure and HDM treatment outlined in Figure 1A. We found that CCL24 levels were significantly reduced for the first 3 weeks, but not after 4 weeks following B. subtilis exposure (Figure 3). Again, we found that suppressed CCL24 at week 3 was independent of EPS production, but EPS was involved in the CCL24 sup- pression at weeks 1 and 2 (Figure 3). Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF super- natant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF superna- *** p < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed tant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and *** p compared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed com- 3.4. Bacillus Fecal Composition Is Similar across Mice Regardless of Treatment with B. subtilis pared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. Spores Figure 3. CCL24 in BALF following B. subtilis treatment. Quantification of CCL24 in BALF superna- To determine whether the waning protection was due to higher levels of B. subtilis tant analyzed by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 3–10). ** p < 0.05 and *** p 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production following exposure that dwindled over time, we collected fecal pellets from mice over < 0.005 by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed com- the course of 8 weeks to assess bacterial composition. We found that mice receiving no pared to HDM alone in the same week. n.s, no sample. House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response B. subtilis and HDM alone and mice receiving WT B. subtilis spores had very similar levels and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. 3.3. B. subtilis Treatment Does Not Influence Immunoglobulin Production House-dust mite-induced eosinophilia is driven by the adaptive immune response and includes involvement of immunoglobulins IgG1 and IgE. To determine whether B. Allergies 2023, 3 6 Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of Bacillus strains identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (Figure 5A). Of note, mice subtilis-mediated protection was influenced by a reduction in IgG1 or IgE production, we treated with epsH B. subtilis spores had elevated levels of Bacillus during the first week measured serum levels of total and HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE. We found that B. subtilis following spore administration (Figure 5A). This elevated Bacillus seemed to be temporarily treatment had no effect on HDM-specific IgG1 and IgE or total IgG1 and IgE levels (Figure detrimental, as evidenced by the elevated eosinophilia in epsH B. subtilis-treated mice 4A–D). during week 1 and protection in weeks 2–3 (Figure 1B). Figure 4. Immunoglobulin levels in serum following B. subtilis treatment. (A–D) Quantification Figure 4. Immunoglobulin levels in serum following B. subtilis treatment. (A–D) Quantification of of serum immunoglobulin levels by ELISA. Data represent mean  SEM representative (n = 2–4). serum immunoglobulin levels by ELISA. Data represent mean ± SEM representative (n = 2–4). One- One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed for each im- way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test was performed for each immuno- munoglobulin and no statistical differences were found. globulin and no statistical differences were found. 3.5. Bacterial Composition Clustering Correlates with Protection from Eosinophilia 3.4. Bacillus Fecal Composition Is Similar across Mice Regardless of Treatment with B. subtilis This early difference induced between epsH and WT B. subtilis was also observed when Spores comparing all bacterial compositions, as evidenced by all three treatment groups clustering To determine whether the waning protection was due to higher levels of B. subtilis separately early in treatment and epsH spores clustering more closely with HDM alone following exposure that dwindled over time, we collected fecal pellets from mice over the during the time of elevated eosinophilia. However, at day 5 epsH spore treatment changed course of 8 weeks to assess bacterial composition. We found that mice receiving no B. its clustering to be more closely related to WT B. subtilis spores, correlating to a shift to subtilis and HDM alone and mice receiving WT B. subtilis spores had very similar levels protection from eosinophilia (Figure 5B). Additionally, we found that bacteria phylum was of Bacillus strains identified by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (Figure 5A). Of note, mice altered by B. subtilis treatment, specifically increased levels of the phylum Bacteroidetes, as treated with epsH B. subtilis spores had elevated levels of Bacillus during the first week well as elevated Verrucomicorbiota early in disease during B. subtilis-mediated protection following spore administration (Figure 5A). This elevated Bacillus seemed to be temporar- (Figure 5C). In addition to elevated Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicorbiota in B. subtilis ily detrimental, as evidenced by the elevated eosinophilia in epsH B. subtilis-treated mice treatment, there was reduced representation by the phylum Firmicutes (Figure 5C). during week 1 and protection in weeks 2–3 (Figure 1B). Allergies 2022, 2, FOR PEER REVIEW 7 Allergies 2023, 3 7 Figure 5. Bacterial composition following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Quantification of Bacillus strains Figure 5. Bacterial composition following B. subtilis treatment. (A) Quantification of Bacillus strains in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing from fecal pellets of mice treated according to the experimental in 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing from fecal pellets of mice treated according to the experimental design in Figure 1A. (B) PCoA plot between HDM alone, HDM + WT spores, and HDM + epsH design in Figure 1A. (B) PCoA plot between HDM alone, HDM + WT spores, and HDM + epsH spores spores on a forced axis for treatment. (C) Taxonomic bar plot indicating relative abundance of bac- on a forced axis for treatment. (C) Taxonomic bar plot indicating relative abundance of bacterial terial phylums. phylums. 3.5. Bacterial Composition Clustering Correlates with Protection from Eosinophilia 4. Discussion This early difference induced between epsH and WT B. subtilis was also observed This work expands our understanding of the duration of protection provided by B. when comparing all bacterial compositions, as evidenced by all three treatment groups subtilis and offers further evidence for its appeal as a probiotic for preventing allergic clustering separately early in treatment and epsH spores clustering more closely with disease. Unlike other probiotics that require early and frequent dosing, B. subtilis is effective HDM alone during the time of elevated eosinophilia. However, at day 5 epsH spore treat- at 6 weeks of age and last for up to 3 weeks. For example, many of the experiments ment changed its clustering to be more closely related to WT B. subtilis spores, correlating investigating the efficacy of the probiotic lactobacillus utilize daily dosing [5]. B. subtilis to a shift to protection from eosinophilia (Figure 5B). Additionally, we found that bacteria provides a novel bacterium to prevent allergic disease with infrequent dosing required. phylum was altered by B. subtilis treatment, specifically increased levels of the phylum Current treatments for allergic disease focus on improving symptoms while rarely Bacteroidetes, as well as elevated Verrucomicorbiota early in disease during B. subtilis- addressing the mechanism of disease [23]. Treatments that do address the mechanism, such mediated protection (Figure 5C). In addition to elevated Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicor- as desensitization studies, involve high patient risk for anaphylactic reactions, are time biota in B. subtilis treatment, there was reduced representation by the phylum Firmicutes consuming and expensive, and have only moderate efficacy [24]. We identified B. subtilis as a candidate for(Fi trg eating ure 5C aller ). gic disease and further characterized B. subtilis-derived EPS as a bacterial-derived molecule that elicits immunosuppression. Specifically, we found that exposure to B. subtilis WT spores resulted in reduced production of eosinophilia at week 1, whereas epsH spore treatment did not show a significant decrease in eosinophils at this timepoint. Additionally, we found that exposure to B. subtilis EPS-producing WT spores resulted in reduced production of the eosinophil chemokine CCL24 at week 1, whereas Allergies 2023, 3 8 EPS was not required for B. subtilis treatment to reduce CCL24 levels or eosinophilia at week 3. CCL24 is produced by many cell types in response to IL-4, including airway epithelial cells, airway smooth-muscle cells, vascular endothelial cells, macrophages, and eosinophils [25–27]. We suspect that the mechanism of B. subtilis WT spores and epsH spores reducing CCL24 at different type points is due to suppression of CCL24 production by different cell types. There is growing evidence that the resident microbiota influences susceptibility to al- lergic disease [28]. Although we and others have identified the immunosuppressive effects of B. subtilis and have investigated the effects on immune-cell function and activation, no one had previously investigated the impact on the host microbiota. We found that treatment with B. subtilis spores influences the bacterial composition of treated mice. Interestingly we found minimal change in Bacillus strains observed by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, which is in line with previous reports showing that B. subtilis spore treatment does not establish elevated colonization, with CFUs/gm feces declining rapidly and reaching the limit of detection around 4 days post exposure [29]. Our work highlights the importance of host microbiota on allergic disease and sheds light on how probiotics can influence bacterial composition. Although allergies are increasing in prevalence and contribute to reductions in quality of life, as well as significant health-care costs [30], we are pursuing a novel method for reducing the incidence of disease using an abundant, cheap, and safe probiotic, Bacillus subtilis. Future work is needed to determine whether B. subtilis can serve as a treatment option after the onset of disease or whether its effects are limited to prophylactic treatment. Additionally, previous work has identified that B. subtilis-derived EPS immune suppression is TLR4 dependent [13], and future studies are needed to determine the requirement for TLR4 in protection from allergic airway inflammation. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, J.A.S.; methodology, R.M.D.T., R.I., O.N. and S.M.; data analysis, R.M.D.T., R.I., O.N., S.M. and J.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.M.D.T. and J.A.S.; writing—review and editing, R.M.D.T., R.I. and J.A.S.; funding acquisition, J.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research received no external funding but was supported by Midwestern University Start-Up Funds and the Midwestern University Core Facility, including the Core Facility Outsourcing Fund, all awarded to J.A.S. Institutional Review Board Statement: The animal-study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL (protocol code #2754, approval date 27 November 2018). Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge and thank the Argonne Sequencing Team for performing the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and Nathaniel Hubert for analysis of the 16S rRNA sequencing data. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. Platts-Mills, T. The allergy epidemics: 1870–2010. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 3–13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 2. Akdis, M. Healthy immune response to allergens: T regulatory cells and more. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18, 738–744. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. Galazzo, G.; van Best, N.; Bervoets, L.; Dapaah, I.O.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Hornef, M.W.; Consortium, G.-M.; Lau, S.; Hamelmann, E.; Penders, J. Development of the Microbiota and Associations With Birth Mode, Diet, and Atopic Disorders in a Longitudinal Analysis of Stool Samples, Collected From Infancy Through Early Childhood. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1584–1596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 4. Johansson, M.A.; Sjogren, Y.M.; Persson, J.O.; Nilsson, C.; Sverremark-Ekstrom, E. Early colonization with a group of Lactobacilli decreases the risk for allergy at five years of age despite allergic heredity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23031. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Allergies 2023, 3 9 5. Jang, S.O.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, M.J.; Kwon, J.W.; Seo, J.H.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Yu, J.; Hong, S.J. Asthma Prevention by + + + Lactobacillus Rhamnosus in a Mouse Model is Associated With CD4 CD25 Foxp3 T Cells. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2012, 4, 150–156. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 6. Raftis, E.J.; Delday, M.I.; Cowie, P.; McCluskey, S.M.; Singh, M.D.; Ettorre, A.; Mulder, I.E. Bifidobacterium breve MRx0004 protects against airway inflammation in a severe asthma model by suppressing both neutrophil and eosinophil lung infiltration. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12024. [CrossRef] 7. Aoki-Yoshida, A.; Yamada, K.; Hachimura, S.; Sashihara, T.; Ikegami, S.; Shimizu, M.; Totsuka, M. Enhancement of Oral Tolerance Induction in DO11.10 Mice by Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2809 via Increase of Effector Regulatory T Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158643. [CrossRef] 8. Smelt, M.J.; de Haan, B.J.; Bron, P.A.; van Swam, I.; Meijerink, M.; Wells, J.M.; Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. L. Plantarum, L. salivarius, and L. lactis attenuate Th2 responses and increase Treg frequencies in healthy mice in a strain dependent manner. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47244. [CrossRef] 9. Tang, C.; Kamiya, T.; Liu, Y.; Kadoki, M.; Kakuta, S.; Oshima, K.; Hattori, M.; Takeshita, K.; Kanai, T.; Saijo, S.; et al. Inhibition of Dectin-1 Signaling Ameliorates Colitis by Inducing Lactobacillus-Mediated Regulatory T Cell Expansion in the Intestine. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 183–197. [CrossRef] 10. Sherid, M.; Samo, S.; Sulaiman, S.; Husein, H.; Sifuentes, H.; Sridhar, S. Liver abscess and bacteremia caused by lactobacillus: Role of probiotics? Case report and review of the literature. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016, 16, 138. [CrossRef] 11. Swartzendruber, J.A.; Incrocci, R.W.; Wolf, S.A.; Jung, A.; Knight, K.L. Bacillus subtilis exopolysaccharide prevents allergic eosinophilia. Allergy 2019, 74, 819–821. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 12. Zhang, L.; Yi, H. An exopolysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis alleviates airway inflammatory responses via the NF-kappaB and STAT6 pathways in asthmatic mice. Biosci. Rep. 2022, 42, BSR20212461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 13. Jones, S.E.; Paynich, M.L.; Kearns, D.B.; Knight, K.L. Protection from Intestinal Inflammation by Bacterial Exopolysaccharides. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 4813–4820. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 14. Paik, W.; Alonzo, F., 3rd; Knight, K.L. Probiotic Exopolysaccharide Protects against Systemic Staphylococcus aureus Infection, Inducing Dual-Functioning Macrophages That Restrict Bacterial Growth and Limit Inflammation. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, e00791-18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 15. Piewngam, P.; Zheng, Y.; Nguyen, T.H.; Dickey, S.W.; Joo, H.S.; Villaruz, A.E.; Glose, K.A.; Fisher, E.L.; Hunt, R.L.; Li, B.; et al. Pathogen elimination by probiotic Bacillus via signalling interference. Nature 2018, 562, 532–537. [CrossRef] 16. Paynich, M.L.; Jones-Burrage, S.E.; Knight, K.L. Exopolysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis Induces Anti-Inflammatory M2 Macrophages That Prevent T Cell-Mediated Disease. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2689–2698. [CrossRef] 17. Hammad, H.; Plantinga, M.; Deswarte, K.; Pouliot, P.; Willart, M.A.; Kool, M.; Muskens, F.; Lambrecht, B.N. Inflammatory dendritic cells—Not basophils—Are necessary and sufficient for induction of Th2 immunity to inhaled house dust mite allergen. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 2097–2111. [CrossRef] 18. Havenith, C.E.; Breedijk, A.J.; Betjes, M.G.; Calame, W.; Beelen, R.H.; Hoefsmit, E.C. T cell priming in situ by intratracheally instilled antigen-pulsed dendritic cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1993, 8, 319–324. [CrossRef] 19. Shimoda, K.; van Deursen, J.; Sangster, M.Y.; Sarawar, S.R.; Carson, R.T.; Tripp, R.A.; Chu, C.; Quelle, F.W.; Nosaka, T.; Vignali, D.A.; et al. Lack of IL-4-induced Th2 response and IgE class switching in mice with disrupted Stat6 gene. Nature 1996, 380, 630–633. [CrossRef] 20. Heiman, A.S.; Abonyo, B.O.; Darling-Reed, S.F.; Alexander, M.S. Cytokine-stimulated human lung alveolar epithelial cells release eotaxin-2 (CCL24) and eotaxin-3 (CCL26). J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2005, 25, 82–91. [CrossRef] 21. Pope, S.M.; Zimmermann, N.; Stringer, K.F.; Karow, M.L.; Rothenberg, M.E. The eotaxin chemokines and CCR3 are fundamental regulators of allergen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 5341–5350. [CrossRef] 22. D’Arienzo, R.; Maurano, F.; Mazzarella, G.; Luongo, D.; Stefanile, R.; Ricca, E.; Rossi, M. Bacillus subtilis spores reduce susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium-mediated enteropathy in a mouse model. Res. Microbiol. 2006, 157, 891–897. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 23. Chung, K.F. Precision medicine in asthma: Linking phenotypes to targeted treatments. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 4–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 24. Virkud, Y.V.; Burks, A.W.; Steele, P.H.; Edwards, L.J.; Berglund, J.P.; Jones, S.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Perry, T.T.; Pesek, R.D.; Vickery, B.P. Novel baseline predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 882–888.e5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 25. Conroy, D.M.; Williams, T.J. Eotaxin and the attraction of eosinophils to the asthmatic lung. Respir. Res. 2001, 2, 150–156. [CrossRef] 26. Humbles, A.A.; Conroy, D.M.; Marleau, S.; Rankin, S.M.; Palframan, R.T.; Proudfoot, A.E.; Wells, T.N.; Li, D.; Jeffery, P.K.; Griffiths-Johnson, D.A.; et al. Kinetics of eotaxin generation and its relationship to eosinophil accumulation in allergic airways disease: Analysis in a guinea pig model in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186, 601–612. [CrossRef] 27. Ying, S.; Robinson, D.S.; Meng, Q.; Rottman, J.; Kennedy, R.; Ringler, D.J.; Mackay, C.R.; Daugherty, B.L.; Springer, M.S.; Durham, S.R.; et al. Enhanced expression of eotaxin and CCR3 mRNA and protein in atopic asthma. Association with airway hyperresponsiveness and predominant co-localization of eotaxin mRNA to bronchial epithelial and endothelial cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997, 27, 3507–3516. [CrossRef] Allergies 2023, 3 10 28. Feehley, T.; Plunkett, C.H.; Bao, R.; Choi Hong, S.M.; Culleen, E.; Belda-Ferre, P.; Campbell, E.; Aitoro, R.; Nocerino, R.; Paparo, L.; et al. Healthy infants harbor intestinal bacteria that protect against food allergy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 448–453. [CrossRef] 29. Jones, S.E.; Knight, K.L. Bacillus subtilis-Mediated Protection from Citrobacter rodentium-Associated Enteric Disease Requires espH and Functional Flagella. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 710–719. [CrossRef] 30. Pawankar, R.; Canonica, G.W.; Holgate, S.T.; Lockey, R.F.; Blaiss, M. World Allergy Organization (WAO) white book on allergy. Nihon Shoni Arerugi Gakkaishi Jpn. J. Pediatr. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 25, 341. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Journal

Allergies – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Published: Dec 23, 2022

Keywords: probiotic; allergy; house-dust mite; eosinophils; host microbiota

There are no references for this article.