Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Wil Aalst (2016)
Process Mining
J. Packer, R. Ballantyne, D. Uzzell (2019)
Interpreting war heritage: Impacts of Anzac museum and battlefield visits on Australians' understanding of national identityAnnals of Tourism Research
Sanna Järvelä, D. Gašević, T. Seppänen, Mykola Pechenizkiy, P. Kirschner (2020)
Bridging learning sciences, machine learning and affective computing for understanding cognition and affect in collaborative learningBr. J. Educ. Technol., 51
Sanna Järvelä, Jonna Malmberg, Marika Koivuniemi (2016)
Recognizing socially shared regulation by using the temporal sequences of online chat and logs in CSCLLearning and Instruction, 42
R. Peleg, A. Baram‐Tsabari (2017)
Learning Robotics in a Science Museum Theatre Play: Investigation of Learning Outcomes, Contexts and ExperiencesJournal of Science Education and Technology, 26
X Feng, LH Qiu, XR Guo (2019)
Recognition method for academic emotions of students’ feedback texts based on LSTM modelJournal of Open Learning, 25
R. Pekrun, T. Goetz, Anne Frenzel, Petra Barchfeld, R. Perry (2011)
Measuring emotions in students learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEFuel and Energy Abstracts
B. Patrick, E. Skinner, J. Connell (1993)
What motivates children's behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain.Journal of personality and social psychology, 65 4
A. Willard, J. Busch, Katherine Cullum, Susan Letourneau, David Sobel, M. Callanan, C. Legare (2019)
Explain This, Explore That: A Study of Parent–Child Interaction in a Children's MuseumChild Development, 90
Toni Rogat, Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia (2011)
Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Groups: An Analysis of the Interplay Between Quality of Social Regulation and Group ProcessesCognition and Instruction, 29
Juan Zheng, Wanli Xing, Gaoxia Zhu (2019)
Examining sequential patterns of self- and socially shared regulation of STEM learning in a CSCL environmentComput. Educ., 136
Sanna Järvelä, P. Kirschner, E. Panadero, Jonna Malmberg, Chris Phielix, J. Jaspers, Marika Koivuniemi, H. Järvenoja (2014)
Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation toolsEducational Technology Research and Development, 63
Feng-ying Zhu (2016)
Patients’ Responsibilities in Medical EthicsPhilosophy study, 6
Y Dong, GL Yu (2007)
The preparation and application of adolescent academic emotion questionnaireActa Psychologica Sinica, 39
Kyungbin Kwon, Ying-Hsiu Liu, L. Johnson (2014)
Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaboratorsComput. Educ., 78
Sanna Järvelä, A. Hadwin (2013)
New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCLEducational Psychologist, 48
Sanna Järvelä, P. Kirschner, A. Hadwin, H. Järvenoja, Jonna Malmberg, Mariel Miller, Jari Laru (2016)
Socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: understanding and prompting individual- and group-level shared regulatory activitiesInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11
Ingeborg Krange, Kenneth Silseth, Palmyre Pierroux (2020)
Peers, teachers and guides: a study of three conditions for scaffolding conceptual learning in science centersCultural Studies of Science Education, 15
V. Grau, D. Whitebread (2012)
Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognitionLearning and Instruction, 22
Wei-Hong Xu, Taotao Dai, Zhi-yi Shen (2021)
Effect sizes and research directions of technology application in museum learning: Evidence obtained by integrating meta-analysis with co-citation network analysisJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 38
Si Zhang, Juan Chen, Yun Wen, Hongxian Chen, Qianqian Gao, Qiyun Wang (2021)
Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approachInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Nikki Lobczowski (2020)
Bridging gaps and moving forward: Building a new model for socioemotional formation and regulationEducational Psychologist, 55
Christoph Sonnenberg, M. Bannert (2015)
Discovering the Effects of Metacognitive Prompts on the Sequential Structure of SRL-Processes Using Process Mining TechniquesJ. Learn. Anal., 2
Jonna Malmberg, Sanna Järvelä, H. Järvenoja (2017)
Capturing temporal and sequential patterns of self-, co-, and socially shared regulation in the context of collaborative learningContemporary Educational Psychology, 49
Tiina Törmänen, H. Järvenoja, Kristiina Mänty (2021)
Exploring groups’ affective states during collaborative learning: what triggers activating affect on a group level?Educational Technology Research and Development, 69
P. Reimann, L. Markauskaite, M. Bannert (2014)
e-Research and learning theory: What do sequence and process mining methods contribute?Br. J. Educ. Technol., 45
M Chen, CY Meng, C Zhou (2018)
Research on ubiquitous learning environment evaluation from the perspective of effective learningJournal of Open Learning, 23
Tova Michalsky, Avigail Cohen (2021)
Prompting Socially Shared Regulation of Learning and Creativity in Solving STEM ProblemsFrontiers in Psychology, 12
Jonna Malmberg, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä (2013)
Patterns in elementary school students′ strategic actions in varying learning situationsInstructional Science, 41
H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä, Jonna Malmberg (2015)
Understanding Regulated Learning in Situative and Contextual FrameworksEducational Psychologist, 50
Suparna Sinha, Toni Rogat, Karlyn Adams-Wiggins, C. Hmelo‐Silver (2015)
Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environmentInternational Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10
M. Bannert, P. Reimann, Christoph Sonnenberg (2014)
Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learningMetacognition and Learning, 9
K. Dahl (2018)
Mo(ve)ments in professional identification: achieving professional identity and becoming a teacher in Danish and Kenyan teacher educationCompare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50
Márta Sobocinski, Jonna Malmberg, Sanna Järvelä (2017)
Exploring temporal sequences of regulatory phases and associated interactions in low- and high-challenge collaborative learning sessionsMetacognition and Learning, 12
Stephanie Hathcock, Daniel Dickerson, Angela Eckhoff, Petros Katsioloudis (2015)
Scaffolding for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM ActivityResearch in Science Education, 45
Nikki Lobczowski, Kayley Lyons, J. Greene, Jacqueline McLaughlin (2021)
Socially shared metacognition in a project-based learning environment: A comparative case studyLearning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30
XQ Gu, H Hu (2018)
Has the learning effect of e-bag occurred? A meta-analysis based on 39 domestic and foreign papersResearch on Visual Education, 39
A. Efklides, S. Volet (2005)
Emotional experiences during learning: Multiple, situated and dynamicLearning and Instruction, 15
J. Russell, Kaori Sato (1995)
Comparing Emotion Words between LanguagesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26
Teachers’ knowledge of the socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL) process of learners, which consists of the task analysis, planning, elaboration, and monitoring, can help teachers intervene when students face difficulties during the collaborative learning. Students’ academic emotions have major effects on their learning motivation, cognition, and performance. This study investigated the changes in SSRL, academic emotions, and product performance of high-, medium-, and low-level groups students after they visited an educational technology center and collaboratively designed a learning environment. We recruited 36 juniors majoring in educational technology. Online group discussions were recorded using online chat tools, and a heuristic mining algorithm was employed on this chat data to determine SSRL processes. The participants were asked to express opinions on their major, and this feedback was used to obtain academic emotion information. Additionally, a scoring was employed to measure the participants’ product performance. The high-level group was discovered to exhibit all four SSRL phases and exhibit positive emotions, with activating emotions more common than deactivating emotions. SSRL was discovered to be related to academic performance; higher academic performance correlated with a more standardized SSRL process. Additionally, the higher a participants’ academic performance, the more frequently the participant had positive academic emotions. Overall, the learners in the high-level group paid more attention to the collaborative learning task.
Active Learning in Higher Education – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2023
Keywords: academic emotions; collaborative learning; socially shared regulation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.