Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition Dual-process and dual-system theories in both cognitive and social psychology have been subjected to a number of recently published criticisms. However, they have been attacked as a category, incorrectly assuming there is a generic version that applies to all. We identify and respond to 5 main lines of argument made by such critics. We agree that some of these arguments have force against some of the theories in the literature but believe them to be overstated. We argue that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science. Our preferred theoretical approach is one in which rapid autonomous processes (Type 1) are assumed to yield default responses unless intervened on by distinctive higher order reasoning processes (Type 2). What defines the difference is that Type 2 processing supports hypothetical thinking and load heavily on working memory. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Perspectives on Psychological Science SAGE

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/dual-process-theories-of-higher-cognition-oTJ53ynrFR

References (134)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2013
ISSN
1745-6916
eISSN
1745-6924
DOI
10.1177/1745691612460685
pmid
26172965
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Dual-process and dual-system theories in both cognitive and social psychology have been subjected to a number of recently published criticisms. However, they have been attacked as a category, incorrectly assuming there is a generic version that applies to all. We identify and respond to 5 main lines of argument made by such critics. We agree that some of these arguments have force against some of the theories in the literature but believe them to be overstated. We argue that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science. Our preferred theoretical approach is one in which rapid autonomous processes (Type 1) are assumed to yield default responses unless intervened on by distinctive higher order reasoning processes (Type 2). What defines the difference is that Type 2 processing supports hypothetical thinking and load heavily on working memory.

Journal

Perspectives on Psychological ScienceSAGE

Published: May 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.