Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Fighting by other Means in the Mideast: A Critical Analysis of Israel's Assassination Policy

Fighting by other Means in the Mideast: A Critical Analysis of Israel's Assassination Policy Israel's efforts to quell violence during the recent conflict with the Palestinians include targeted assassinations of militia leaders. The international community permits the use of lethal force in only two cases, law enforcement and just war, and assassination cannot be justified in either. In the context of law enforcement, assassination remains prohibited as a form of extra-legal execution, regardless of Israel's status as an occupying power. In the context of just war, assassination violates the proscription against perfidious and treacherous means of warfare. In the current conflict, assassination cannot be accomplished without collaborators, a practice that not only is prohibited by convention but seriously undermines Palestinian society. As a result, assassination provokes violent retaliation and corrodes the basis necessary to renew peace negotiations. Nevertheless, assassination may be defensible as a last resort in some cases. These include tyrannicide, killing a murderous and brutal leader to protect innocent civilians, together with instances of ‘ticking bombs’ – that is, immediate and otherwise unavoidable grievous threats to noncombatants. In each case a modified argument from necessity offers grounds for the defensible, although limited, use of assassination. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Political Science SAGE

Fighting by other Means in the Mideast: A Critical Analysis of Israel's Assassination Policy

Political Science , Volume 51 (2): 19 – Jun 1, 2003

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/fighting-by-other-means-in-the-mideast-a-critical-analysis-of-israel-s-G88j6vromt

References (54)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© Political Studies Association, 2003
ISSN
0032-3187
eISSN
2041-0611
DOI
10.1111/1467-9248.00428
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Israel's efforts to quell violence during the recent conflict with the Palestinians include targeted assassinations of militia leaders. The international community permits the use of lethal force in only two cases, law enforcement and just war, and assassination cannot be justified in either. In the context of law enforcement, assassination remains prohibited as a form of extra-legal execution, regardless of Israel's status as an occupying power. In the context of just war, assassination violates the proscription against perfidious and treacherous means of warfare. In the current conflict, assassination cannot be accomplished without collaborators, a practice that not only is prohibited by convention but seriously undermines Palestinian society. As a result, assassination provokes violent retaliation and corrodes the basis necessary to renew peace negotiations. Nevertheless, assassination may be defensible as a last resort in some cases. These include tyrannicide, killing a murderous and brutal leader to protect innocent civilians, together with instances of ‘ticking bombs’ – that is, immediate and otherwise unavoidable grievous threats to noncombatants. In each case a modified argument from necessity offers grounds for the defensible, although limited, use of assassination.

Journal

Political ScienceSAGE

Published: Jun 1, 2003

There are no references for this article.