Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Rival, T. Moore, A. McAleenan, H. Hamilton, Zachary Toit, E. Akowuah, G. Angelini, H. Vohra (2019)
Transthoracic clamp versus endoaortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
F. Mohr, V. Falk, A. Diegeler, T. Walther, J. Son, R. Autschbach, H. Borst (1998)
Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 115 3
D. Murphy, E. Moss, Jose Binongo, Jeffrey Miller, S. Macheers, E. Sarin, Alexander Herzog, V. Thourani, R. Guyton, Michael Halkos (2015)
The Expanding Role of Endoscopic Robotics in Mitral Valve Surgery: 1,257 Consecutive Procedures.The Annals of thoracic surgery, 100 5
M. Moscarelli, K. Fattouch, M. Gaudino, G. Nasso, Dodo Paparella, P. Punjabi, T. Athanasiou, U. Benedetto, G. Angelini, G. Santarpino, G. Speziale (2020)
Minimal access versus sternotomy for complex mitral valve repair: A meta-analysis.The Annals of thoracic surgery
W. Chitwood, L. Nifong (2000)
Minimally Invasive Videloscopic Mitral Valve Surgery: The Current Role of Surgical RoboticsJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 15
J. Dearani (2018)
Robotic heart surgery: Hype or hope?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 155 1
(1998)
Computer assisted open heart surgery
N. Bonaros, D. Hoefer, C. Oezpeker, C. Gollmann-Tepekoeylue, J. Holfeld, J. Dumfarth, J. Kilo, E. Ruttmann-Ulmer, H. Hangler, M. Grimm, L. Mueller (2021)
Predictors of safety and success in minimally invasive surgery for degenerative mitral disease.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
R. Hawkins, J. Mehaffey, M. Mullen, W. Nifong, W. Chitwood, M. Katz, M. Quader, A. Kiser, A. Speir, G. Ailawadi (2018)
A propensity matched analysis of robotic, minimally invasive, and conventional mitral valve surgeryHeart, 104
M Enriquez-Sarano, RM Suri, MA Clavel (2015)
Is there an outcome penalty to guideline-based indications for valvular surgery? Early and long-term analysis of patients with organic mitral regurgitationJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 150
S. Sündermann, J. Sromicki, H. Biefer, B. Seifert, T. Holubec, V. Falk, S. Jacobs (2014)
Mitral valve surgery: right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 148 5
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman (2009)
METHODS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSIS Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
X. Wan, Wen-Che Wang, Jiming Liu, T. Tong (2014)
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile rangeBMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. Altman (2011)
Preferred reporting items of systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementDeutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 136
R. Chemtob, P. Wierup, S. Mick, Michael Javorski, D. Burns, E. Blackstone, L. Svensson, A. Gillinov, Diana Lopez, M. Semple, M. Desai (2020)
A conservative screening algorithm to determine candidacy for robotic mitral valve surgery.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
(2022)
OUP accepted manuscriptEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff (2009)
Preferred reporting item for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementJ Clin Epideniol, 62
D. Paparella, K. Fattouch, M. Moscarelli, G. Santarpino, G. Nasso, P. Guida, V. Margari, L. Martinelli, R. Coppola, A. Albertini, M. Giglio, R. Gregorini, G. Speziale (2019)
Current trends in mitral valve surgery: A multicenter national comparison between full-sternotomy and minimally-invasive approach.International journal of cardiology
Risto Kesävuori, P. Raivio, J. Jokinen, A. Sahlman, K. Teittinen, A. Vento (2017)
Early experience with robotic mitral valve repair with intra‐aortic occlusionThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 155
L. Canale, A. Colafranceschi (2015)
Is robotic mitral valve surgery more expensive than its conventional counterpart?Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 20 6
T. Mihaljevic, Marijan Koprivanac, Marta Kelava, Avi Goodman, C. Jarrett, Sarah Williams, A. Gillinov, G. Bajwa, S. Mick, J. Bonatti, E. Blackstone (2014)
Value of robotically assisted surgery for mitral valve disease.JAMA surgery, 149 7
M. Sá, Jef Eynde, L. Cavalcanti, B. Kadyraliev, Soslan Enginoev, K. Zhigalov, A. Ruhparwar, A. Weymann, G. Dreyfus (2020)
Mitral valve repair with minimally invasive approaches vs sternotomy: A meta-analysis of early and late results in randomized and matched observational studies.Journal of cardiac surgery
J. Caro (2012)
ESC/EACTS Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease
DF Stroup, JA Berlin, SC Morton (2000)
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reportingJAMA, 283
Stephanie Bär, S. Hein, K. Bramlage (2020)
Issue Information PageJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 35
D. Loulmet, Neel Ranganath, S. Neragi-Miandoab, M. Koeckert, A. Galloway, E. Grossi (2019)
Advanced experience allows robotic mitral valve repair in the presence of extensive mitral annular calcification.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
Josef Smolen, M. Schoels, V. Bykerk, Ernest Choy (2004)
Consensus StatementSpine Deformity, 3
F. Casselman, S. Slycke, Helge Dom, D. Lambrechts, Y. Vermeulen, H. Vanermen (2003)
Endoscopic mitral valve repair: feasible, reproducible, and durable.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 125 2
M. Gillinov, T. Mihaljevic, Hoda Javadikasgari, R. Suri, S. Mick, J. Navia, M. Desai, J. Bonatti, Mitra Khosravi, Jay Idrees, A. Lowry, E. Blackstone, L. Svensson (2018)
Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: Analysis of the first 1000 casesThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 155
Michael Williams, Bridget Hwang, Linna Huang, A. Wilson-Smith, J. Brookes, A. Eranki, T. Yan, T. Guy, J. Bonatti (2022)
Robotic versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysisAnnals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 11
Shixiong Wei, Xin Zhang, Huimin Cui, Lin Zhang, Z. Gong, Liang-gang Li, Tong Ren, Chang-qing Gao, Shengli Jiang (2020)
Comparison of clinical outcomes between robotic and thoracoscopic mitral valve repair.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 10 5
J. Bonatti, I. Crailsheim, M. Grabenwöger, B. Winkler (2021)
Minimally Invasive and Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery: Methods and Outcomes in a 20-Year ReviewInnovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 16
J Kempfert, M Kofler, V Falk (2022)
Minimally invasive endoscopic mitral valve repair-the new gold standard for degenerative mitral valve diseaseEur J Cardiothorac Surg, 61
K. Praet, M. Kofler, Solveig Hirsch, S. Akansel, M. Hommel, S. Sündermann, A. Meyer, S. Jacobs, V. Falk, J. Kempfert (2022)
Factors associated with an unsuccessful Fast-Track course following Minimally Invasive Surgical Mitral Valve Repair.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
M. Enriquez-Sarano, R. Suri, M. Clavel, A. FrancescaMantovani, H. Michelena, S. Pislaru, DouglasW. Mahoney, H. Schaff
ACQUIRED CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE : MITRALVALVE A C D Is there an outcome penalty linked to guideline-based indications for valvular surgery ? Early and long-term analysis of patients with organic mitral regurgitation
Y. Barac, Rahul Loungani, Richard Sabulsky, B. Zwischenberger, J. Gaca, Keith Carr, D. Glower (2021)
Robotic versus port‐access mitral repair: A propensity score analysisJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 36
A. Vahanian, F. Beyersdorf, F. Praz, M. Milojevic, S. Baldus, J. Bauersachs, D. Capodanno, L. Conradi, M. Bonis, R. Paulis, V. Delgado, N. Freemantle, M. Gilard, K. Haugaa, A. Jeppsson, P. Jüni, L. Pierard, B. Prendergast, J. Sádaba, C. Tribouilloy, W. Wojakowski, Franz‐Josef Neumann, Pat Myers, M. Abdelhamid, S. Achenbach, R. Asteggiano, F. Barili, M. Borger, T. Carrel, J. Collet, Dan Foldager, G. Habib, C. Hassager, A. Irs, B. Iung, M. Jahangiri, H. Katus, Konstantinos Koskinas, S. Massberg, Christian Mueller, J. Nielsen, P. Pibarot, A. Rakisheva, M. Roffi, A. Rubboli, E. Shlyakhto, M. Siepe, M. Sitges, L. Søndergaard, M. Sousa‐Uva, G. Tarantini, J. Zamorano (2021)
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
T. Mihaljevic, C. Jarrett, A. Gillinov, Sarah Williams, Pierre Devilliers, W. Stewart, L. Svensson, J. Sabik, E. Blackstone (2011)
Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 141 1
ObjectivesThere is still ongoing debate about the benefits of robotic assistance (R-MVS) in comparison with video assistance (V-MVS) in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. This study aims to update the current evidence.MethodsThree propensity score–matched studies published from 2011 to 2021 were included with a total of 1193 patients operated on from 2005 (R-MVS: 536, V-MVS: 657). Data regarding early mortality, postoperative event, and time-related outcomes were extracted and submitted to a meta-analysis using weighted random-effects modeling.ResultsThe incidence of early mortality, stroke, renal failure, conversion, atrial fibrillation, and prolonged ventilation were similar, all in the absence of heterogeneity. Reoperation for bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16–0.81, p = 0.01) and the need for blood transfusion (OR: 0.30, 95% CI, 0.20–0.56, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in V-MVS group. Regarding time-related outcomes, there was evidence for important heterogeneity of treatment effect among the studies. Operative times were longer in R-MVS: differences in means were 20.7 min for cross-clamp time (95% CI, 9.07–32.3, p = 0.001), 20.7 min for cardiopulmonary bypass time (95% CI, 2.5–38.9, p = 0.03) and 40.2 min for total operative time (95% CI, 24.5–55.8, p < 0.001). Intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were reported in one study, and longer after R-MVS compared to V-MVS; the differences in means were 0.17 days (p = 0.005) and 0.6 days (p = 0.017), respectively. Total cost of both procedures was reported in an additional dedicated propensity score–matched series including 448 patients; it was 21% higher for R-MVS than for V-MVS.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis showed excellent outcomes of both video and robotic techniques with low incidence of morbidity and mortality. However, there is no evidence for an added value of robotic assistance in comparison with video assistance; the drawbacks of mini access are reported higher regardless the induced over cost.
Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals – SAGE
Published: May 1, 2023
Keywords: Mitral valve surgery; minimally invasive surgery; minithoracotomy; video-assisted surgery; robotic surgery; meta-analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.