Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Verlin Hinsz (1990)
Cognitive and Consensus Processes in Group Recognition Memory PerformanceJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59
C. Wieman, G. Rieger, C. Heiner (2014)
Physics Exams that Promote Collaborative LearningThe Physics Teacher, 52
P. Laughlin, H. Carey, N. Kerr (2008)
Group-to-Individual Problem-Solving TransferGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11
Benjamin Yu, George Tsiknis, M. Allen (2010)
Turning exams into a learning experience
B. Gilley, B. Clarkston (2013)
Collaborative Testing: Evidence of Learning in a Controlled In-Class Study of Undergraduate StudentsThe journal of college science teaching, 43
Mitchell Chang, M. Eagan, Monica Lin, Sylvia Hurtado, Mitchell Chang (2011)
Considering the Impact of Racial Stigmas and Science Identity: Persistence among Biomedical and Behavioral Science AspirantsThe Journal of Higher Education, 82
S. Barber, S. Rajaram (2011)
Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recallMemory, 19
J. Cranney, Mi-ri Ahn, Rachel McKinnon, Sue Morris, K. Watts (2009)
The testing effect, collaborative learning, and retrieval-induced facilitation in a classroom settingEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21
T. Eaton (2009)
Engaging Students and Evaluating Learning Progress using Collaborative Exams in Introductory CoursesJournal of Geoscience Education, 57
M. Giuliodori, H. Lujan, S. DiCarlo (2008)
Collaborative group testing benefits high- and low-performing students.Advances in physiology education, 32 4
Sumangala Rao, H. Collins, S. DiCarlo (2002)
Collaborative testing enhances student learning.Advances in physiology education, 26 1-4
P. Laughlin, A. Ellis (1986)
Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22
P. Laughlin (2011)
Group Problem Solving
R. Tindale, Susan Sheffey (2002)
Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group MemoryGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5
F. Olivera, Susan Straus (2004)
Group-to-Individual Transfer of LearningSmall Group Research, 35
S. Stearns (1996)
Collaborative Exams as Learning ToolsCollege Teaching, 44
Jane Vogler, D. Robinson (2016)
Team-Based Testing Improves Individual LearningThe Journal of Experimental Education, 84
J. Davis (1973)
Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes.Psychological Review, 80
R. Tindale, T. Kameda (2000)
‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in GroupsGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3
J. Mahoney, Brooke Harris-Reeves (2019)
The effects of collaborative testing on higher order thinking: Do the bright get brighter?Active Learning in Higher Education, 20
Verlin Hinsz, R. Tindale, D. Vollrath (1997)
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.Psychological bulletin, 121 1
Susan Kapitanoff, Carol Pandey (2018)
COLLABORATIVE TESTING IN STATISTICS: GROUP INTERACTION, ANXIETY, AND CLASS PERFORMANCESTATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL
N. Kerr, R. Tindale (2004)
Group performance and decision making.Annual review of psychology, 55
Hayley Leight, Cheston Saunders, Robin Calkins, Michelle Withers (2012)
Collaborative Testing Improves Performance but Not Content Retention in a Large-Enrollment Introductory Biology ClassCBE Life Sciences Education, 11
Sandra Efu (2018)
Exams as Learning Tools: A Comparison of Traditional and Collaborative Assessment in Higher EducationCollege Teaching, 67
B. Rempel, Maria Dirks, Elizabeth McGinitie (2021)
Two-Stage Testing Reduces Student-Perceived Exam Anxiety in Introductory ChemistryJournal of Chemical Education
G. Rieger, C. Heiner (2014)
Examinations That Support Collaborative Learning: The Students' PerspectiveThe journal of college science teaching, 43
B. Bonner, Michael Baumann (2012)
Leveraging member expertise to improve knowledge transfer and demonstrability in groups.Journal of personality and social psychology, 102 2
Susan Kapitanoff (2009)
Collaborative testingActive Learning in Higher Education, 10
R. Cortright, H. Collins, D. Rodenbaugh, S. DiCarlo (2003)
Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.Advances in physiology education, 27 1-4
Two-phase testing assesses individual performance (phase 1) and then allows collaborative learning within small groups (phase 2). While groups typically outperform individuals, less is known about the social decision schemes that influence member collaboration. In a classroom setting, we compared individual and group performance on a standard test versus a two-phase test (Study 1 n = 180, Study 2 n = 60) to determine the impact of collaborative testing on recalling factual and application based test items. We also assessed various aspects of group dynamics (e.g. liking). Both studies showed several benefits to collaborative testing with few costs: students enjoyed collaborative testing and the performance benefits were stronger for lower scoring students and integrative versus factual test items.
Active Learning in Higher Education – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2023
Keywords: collaborative testing; group decision making; group test; group-to-individual transfer; social decision schemes
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.