Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Braeken, D. Magis, David Stillwell (2015)
Computerized adaptive testing
A. Setari, Jungmin Lee, K. Bradley (2016)
A psychometric approach to the validation of a student evaluation of teaching instrumentStudies in Educational Evaluation, 51
Ying Cheng, Hua-Hua Chang (2009)
The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology, 62 Pt 2
E. Wolfe (2004)
Identifying Rater Effects Using Latent Trait ModelsPsychology Science, 46
W. Boone, J. Townsend, John Staver (2016)
Utilizing Multifaceted Rasch Measurement Through FACETS to Evaluate Science Education Data Sets Composed of Judges, Respondents, and Rating Scale Items: An Exemplar Utilizing the Elementary Science Teaching Analysis Matrix InstrumentScience Education, 100
H. Wainer (2000)
Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer
A. Dempster, N. Laird, D. Rubin (1977)
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
Heidi Anderson, J. Cain (2005)
REVIEWS Online Student Course Evaluations: Review of Literature and a Pilot StudyThe American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69
Alexander Weissman
Measurement Educational and Psychological Mutual Information Item Selection in Adaptive Classification Testing
Brian Wesolowski, Stefanie Wind, G. Engelhard (2016)
Examining Rater Precision in Music Performance Assessment: An Analysis of Rating Scale Structure Using the Multifaceted Rasch Partial Credit ModelMusic Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33
Curt *, P. Baum, Robert Hanna, Kenneth Chapman (2004)
Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluationsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29
Eyal Gamliel, Liema Davidovitz (2005)
Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: mode can matterAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30
Tianyou Wang, M. Kolen (2001)
Evaluating Comparability in Computerized Adaptive Testing: Issues, Criteria and an ExampleJournal of Educational Measurement, 38
G. Kingsbury, Anthony Zara (1989)
Procedures for Selecting Items for Computerized Adaptive Tests.Applied Measurement in Education, 2
R. Holzbach (1978)
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63
Stefanie Wind, E. Jones (2019)
The Effects of Incomplete Rating Designs in Combination With Rater EffectsJournal of Educational Measurement
Chi-Keung Leung, Hua-Hua Chang, K. Hau (2000)
Content Balancing in Stratified Computerized Adaptive Testing Designs, 2000
F. Lord, M. Novick, A. Birnbaum (1966)
Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability
Terry Ackerman (2005)
Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models
Michael Harwell, Clement Stone, T. Hsu, L. Kirisci (1996)
Monte Carlo Studies in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 20
F. Lord (1980)
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
Valencia Acuna, E. Andrés (2017)
Response Styles in Student Evaluation of Teaching
E. Muraki (1992)
A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL: APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHMETS Research Report Series, 1992
(2012)
Generalizability Theory and Many-facet Rasch Measurement
I. Hsueh, Jyun-Hong Chen, Chun-Hou Wang, Cheng-Te Chen, Ching-Fan Sheu, Wen-Chung Wang, W. Hou, C. Hsieh (2010)
Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Assessing Balance Function in Patients With StrokePhysical Therapy, 90
W. Linden (2005)
A Comparison of Item-Selection Methods for Adaptive Tests with Content ConstraintsJournal of Educational Measurement, 42
(2000)
Testing algorithms
D. Kember, A. Wong (2000)
Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teachingHigher Education, 40
A. Paolo, G. Bonaminio, Cheryl Gibson, Ty Partridge, Ken Kallail (2000)
Response Rate Comparisons of E-Mail- and Mail-Distributed Student EvaluationsTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 12
M. Stocking (1994)
THREE PRACTICAL ISSUES FOR MODERN ADAPTIVE TESTING ITEM POOLS1ETS Research Report Series, 1994
Stanislav Grof, M. Transpersonal
On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical StatisticsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 222
William Hoyt (2000)
Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it?Psychological methods, 5 1
F. Lord (1984)
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND BAYESIAN PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORYJournal of Educational Measurement, 23
Hua-Hua Chang, Z. Ying (1996)
A Global Information Approach to Computerized Adaptive TestingApplied Psychological Measurement, 20
Lawrence Rudner (2009)
Implementing the Graduate Management Admission Test Computerized Adaptive Test
Shu-Ying Chen, Robert Ankenmann, J. Spray (1999)
Exploring the Relationship between Item Exposure Rate and Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Student evaluation of teaching (SET) assesses students’ experiences in a class to evaluate teachers’ performance in class. SET essentially comprises three facets: teaching proficiency, student rating harshness, and item properties. The computerized adaptive testing form of SET with an established item pool has been used in educational environments. However, conventional scoring methods ignore the harshness of students toward teachers and, therefore, are unable to provide a valid assessment. In addition, simultaneously estimating teachers’ teaching proficiency and students’ harshness remains an unaddressed issue in the context of online SET. In the current study, we develop and compare three novel methods—marginal, iterative once, and hybrid approaches—to improve the precision of parameter estimations. A simulation study is conducted to demonstrate that the hybrid method is a promising technique that can substantially outperform traditional methods.
Applied Psychological Measurement – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 2023
Keywords: item response theory; parameter estimation; student evaluation of teaching
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.