Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jennifer Raymond, M. Goodman (2019)
Funders should evaluate projects, not peopleThe Lancet, 393
S. Hawkes, F. Haseen, H. Aounallah-Skhiri (2019)
Measurement and meaning: reporting sex in health researchThe Lancet, 393
Anne Lincoln, S. Pincus, Jan Koster, Phoebe Leboy (2012)
The Matilda Effect in science: Awards and prizes in the US, 1990s and 2000sSocial Studies of Science, 42
(2017)
AAS and the under-recognition of women for awards and prizes
Cassidy Sugimoto, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Elise Smith, Benoit Macaluso, V. Larivière (2019)
Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysisThe Lancet, 393
A. Stewart, Virginia Valian (2018)
An Inclusive Academy: Achieving Diversity and Excellence
C. Pritlove, C. Juandó-Prats, K. Ala-leppilampi, J. Parsons (2019)
The good, the bad, and the ugly of implicit biasThe Lancet, 393
Anne Lincoln, S. Pincus, Phoebe Leboy (2011)
Scholars' awards go mainly to menNature, 469
Melissa Nelson (2004)
Where credit is due.Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104 7
(2008)
Fixing the leaky pipeline: why aren’t there many women in the top spots in academia
(2019)
The Matilda effect in STEM: what you can do to mitigate the role of bias in awards
M. Rossiter (1993)
The Matthew Matilda Effect in ScienceSocial Studies of Science, 23
Jocalyn Clark, R. Horton (2019)
What is The Lancet doing about gender and diversity?The Lancet, 393
(2017)
Creating equitable stem workplaces by addressing unconscious bias online
S. Klein, L. Schiebinger, M. Stefanick, L. Cahill, J. Danska, G. Vries, M. Kibbe, M. McCarthy, J. Mogil, T. Woodruff, I. Zucker (2015)
Opinion: Sex inclusion in basic research drives discoveryProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112
M. Nielsen, J. Andersen, L. Schiebinger, J. Schneider (2017)
One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysisNature Human Behaviour, 1
Alice, Popejoy, Phoebe, Leboy (2012)
Is Math Still Just a Man's World?, 2
(2015)
AWIS: improving recognition through awards: how to mitigate bias in awards online
The International Association for Dental Research (IADR) Distinguished Scientist Awards are prestigious recognitions of outstanding scientific accomplishments in various areas of dental, oral, and craniofacial research, which correspond to several of the IADR Scientific Groups and Networks. These 17 awards were established over a period of 60 y. The objective of this report is to highlight women recipients of IADR Distinguished Scientist Awards. Additionally, we report the distribution of awards to women scientists over time and compare the number of women nominees, awardees, and gender distribution of the membership. Information about the awards was obtained from the IADR member database and press releases. Information collected included name of the award, year received, and the awardee’s name, institution, and position held at the time of the award. For the last 14 y, the time span for which reliable information was available, the gender distribution of the membership of the IADR was also retrieved. Overall, only 13% of the awardees have been women; even in the last 20 y, <20% have been women. In the last 14 y, the number of women awardees paralleled the number of nominees for each award. However, the proportion of women nominees was significantly lower than the female membership each year (P < 0.001). With the exception of 1 y, the percentage of women awardees trailed the women membership of the IADR. In the past 4 y, women represented 12% to 18% of the awardees, whereas they composed 41% to 46% of the IADR’s membership. Given the benefits of prestigious recognitions on recruitment and retention of faculty and on attracting new research trainees into a discipline, it is important that policies be implemented to increase the proportion of women nominees for awards to appropriately recognize the efforts of remarkable women scientists.
Advances in Dental Research – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 2019
Keywords: scholarly awards,women nominees,women scientists,recognition,dental, oral, and craniofacial research,STEM
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.