Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Ioffe (1981)
Calculation of baryon masses in quantum chromodynamicsNuclear Physics, 188
Kwei-Chou Yang, W. Hwang, E. Henley, L. Kisslinger (1993)
QCD sum rules and neutron-proton mass difference.Physical review. D, Particles and fields, 47 7
M. Jamin (1988)
Radiative corrections for baryonic correlatorsZeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 37
M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, V. Zakharov (1979)
QCD and resonance physics. theoretical foundationsNuclear Physics, 147
D. Jido, Nobuaki Kodama, M. Oka (1996)
Negative-parity nucleon resonance in the QCD sum rule.Physical review. D, Particles and fields, 54 7
Adami, Zahed (1992)
Finite-temperature QCD sum rules for the nucleon.Physical review. D, Particles and fields, 45 11
Philipp Gubler, M. Oka (2010)
A Bayesian Approach to QCD Sum RulesProgress of Theoretical Physics, 124
D. Leinweber (1995)
QCD sum rules for skepticsAnnals of Physics, 254
H. Dosch, M. Jamin, S. Narison (1989)
Baryon masses and flavour symmetry breaking of chiral condensatesPhysics Letters B, 220
G. Sterman (2002)
At the Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCDPhysics Today, 56
T. Cohen, R. Furnstahl, D. Griegel, Xuemin Jin (1995)
QCD sum rules and applications to nuclear physicsProgress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 35
D. Leinweber (1990)
QCD sum rule analysis of spin-orbit splitting in baryonsAnnals of Physics, 198
G. Orlandini, T. Steele, D. Harnett (2000)
Gaussian sum-rules and prediction of resonance propertiesNuclear Physics, 686
Y. Chung, H. Dosch, M. Kremer, D. Schall (1982)
Baryon sum rules and chiral symmetry breakingNuclear Physics, 197
H. Shiomi, T. Hatsuda (1995)
The Pion - Nucleon coupling constant in QCD sum rulesNuclear Physics, 594
D. Leinweber (1994)
Nucleon properties from unconventional interpolating fields.Physical review. D, Particles and fields, 51 11
B. Ioffe (1983)
On the choice of quark currents in the QCD sum rules for baryon massesZeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 18
N. Krasnikov, A. Pivovarov, N. Tavkhelidze (1983)
The use of finite energy sum rules for the description of the hadronic properties of QCDZeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 19
Keisuke Ohtani, Philipp Gubler, M. Oka (2011)
A Bayesian analysis of the nucleon QCD sum rulesThe European Physical Journal A, 47
Y. Chung, H. Dosch, M. Kremer, D. Schall (1984)
Chiral symmetry breaking condensates from baryonic sum rulesZeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 25
Y. Chung, H. Dosch, M. Kremer, D. Schall (1982)
Does chiral symmetry breaking cause the Nucleon-Delta mass difference?Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 15
V. Efros, W. Leidemann, G. Orlandini, N. Barnea (2007)
TOPICAL REVIEW: The Lorentz integral transform (LIT) method and its applications to perturbation-induced reactionsJournal of Physics G
S. Sasaki, T. Blum, Shigemi Tokyo, R. Bnl, Kek (2001)
A lattice study of the nucleon excited states with domain wall fermionsPhysical Review D, 65
M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, V. Zakharov (1979)
QCD and Resonance Physics: ApplicationsNuclear Physics, 147
W. Melnitchouk, S. Bilson-Thompson, F. Bonnet, F. Lee, D. Leinweber, Anthony Williams, J. Zanotti, Jian-bo Zhang (2003)
Excited Baryons in Lattice QCDPhysical Review D, 67
A. Ovchinnikov, A. Pivovarov, L. Surguladze (1991)
BARYONIC SUM RULES IN THE NEXT-TO-LEADING ORDER IN αsInternational Journal of Modern Physics A, 06
Pietro Colangelo, A. Khodjamirian (2000)
QCD sum rules, a modern perspectivearXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
V. Efros, W. Leidemann, G. Orlandini (1994)
Response functions from integral transforms with a Lorentz kernelPhysics Letters B, 338
Hatsuda, Hogaasen, Prakash (1991)
QCD sum rules in medium and the Okamoto-Nolen-Schiffer anomaly.Physical review letters, 66 22
R. Bertlmann, G. Launer, E. Rafael (1985)
Gaussian sum rules in quantum chromodynamics and local dualityNuclear Physics, 250
V. Sadovnikova, E. Drukarev, M. Ryskin (2005)
Nucleon QCD sum rules with radiative correctionsPhysical Review D, 72
[After having shown that the sum rule of the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document} meson can be analyzed by MEM, we in this chapter proceed to the next classic sum rule, the one of the nucleon. As will be seen, the analysis of this sum rule is more difficult compared with the \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document} meson case, especially because the interpolating field here contains three quarks and thus has a larger mass dimension, which leads to a slower convergence and larger uncertainties of the OPE. As a consequence, we will show that the MEM analysis of the nucleon sum rule with a Borel kernel in fact does not work well. On the other hand, the sum rule with a Gaussian kernel provides reasonable results. This chapter is mainly based on K. Ohtani, P. Gubler and M. Oka, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 114 (2011)., and its results were calculated by K. Ohtani.]
Published: Mar 30, 2013
Keywords: Gaussian sum rule; Interpolating field; Parity projection
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.