Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[In the 1980s, it was argued that privatization was to be the cure-all for governments lacking the needed resources to modernize social service deliveries like water, and that the private sector would be in a better position than the government to provide for this. Given this backdrop, the Philippine government in 1997 privatized Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS), its publicly-owned water service provided for Metro Manila. The provision of water was given to two private water concessionaires, Maynilad and Manila Water which failed to deliver on their promises. The Philippine experience is mirrored in other areas of the world which have led toward a movement for local governments to reclaim water as a public service. Because of this, several alternatives to water privatization have emerged, which include the following: (1) Public/non-profit partnerships (PuNPP) or co-privatization; (2) Single non-profit agencies (SiNPs); and (3) Deprivatization and/or remunicipalization.]
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Water privatization; Maynilad; Manila water; Remunicipalization; Philippines
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.