Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Disaster risk financing is usually sourced from public funds for recovery and rehabilitation. National government allocates large amounts of public funds for recovery, rather than on public investments for development. Risk transfer mechanisms (RTMs), such as local insurance, ease the financial burden on local governments by providing additional funds for early recovery. While many laws require insurance of local public assets against disasters, these are still not insured, or are under-insured. This chapter assesses current issues on RTMs by looking at the experience of Quezon City to identify policy gaps that need to be addressed in charting an enabling policy. It argues that institutional convergence, RTM risk layering, and risk transfer options planning be part of the investment planning process of local disaster funds. These can be undertaken by crafting a clear policy strategy—ensuring that insurance funds are locally available for timely disaster recovery.]
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Local insurance; Risk transfer mechanisms; Disaster risk financing and insurance; Risk transfer options planning; Risk layering
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.