Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[According to Marx, the class conflict of the preindustrial world was there between the feudal oligarchy and the serfs, but after the first industrial revolution, the class struggle was between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. In the reindustrialized world, industry-2.0, too, the opposition of bourgeoisie and proletariat continued minimally, but the gap began to reduce with some promising out-comes for better distribution of wealth had emerged. In all those cases anomalies, wealth distribution was the major issue and was centered on the dialectic between rich versus poor. But, in the postmodern globalized world, industry-3.0, under the budding of plutonomy this antagonism is largely between plutocrats versus precariats, furthering the dialectic between rich versus poor that the rich become the absolute, leaving the poor insignificantly behind. This happened because the large portions of the work force are the new herd of part-time workers who live their lives by shifting between unemployment and underemployment, for finally not getting any economic security to formulate a steady living situation with family, etc.]
Published: Nov 11, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.