Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Amitav Acharya, B. Buzan (2007)
Preface: Why is there no non-Western IR theory: reflections on and from AsiaInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7
Richard Ashley (1981)
Political Realism and Human InterestsInternational Studies Quarterly, 25
Yaqing Qin (2007)
Why is there no Chinese international relations theoryInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7
P. Jackson, Daniel Nexon (1999)
Relations Before States:European Journal of International Relations, 5
H. Bull (1977)
The Anarchical Society
M. Moore (2016)
Buddhism and Political Theory
William Callahan (2008)
Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-hegemonic or a New Hegemony?International Studies Review, 10
O. Wæver (1998)
The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International RelationsInternational Organization, 52
C. Shih, Po-tsan Yu (2015)
Post-Western International Relations Reconsidered
W. Long (2018)
Tantric State
J. Hobson (2012)
The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: 1760–1914
Deepshikha Shahi, Gennaro Ascione (2016)
Rethinking the absence of post-Western International Relations theory in India: ‘Advaitic monism’ as an alternative epistemological resourceEuropean Journal of International Relations, 22
S. Grovogui (2006)
Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy
Deepshikha Shahi (2019)
Introducing Sufism to International Relations Theory: A preliminary inquiry into epistemological, ontological, and methodological pathwaysEuropean Journal of International Relations, 25
R. Cox, Timothy Sinclair (1996)
Approaches to world order: Index of names
Turan Kayaoglu (2010)
Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations TheoryInternational Studies Review, 12
Tingyang Zhao (2006)
Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia, )Social Identities, 12
[Many scholars have wondered if a non-Western theory of international politics founded on different premises, be it from Asia or from the “Global South,” could release international relations from the grip of a Western, “Westphalian” model in which self-interest (and opposition to the other) and system anarchy treat conflict and violence as natural and ethical behavior among states. As part of the emergent literature in Global International Relations, this monograph suggests that a Buddhist approach to international relations could provide a genuine alternative. Because of its distinctive philosophical positions and its unique understanding of reality, human nature, and political behavior, a Buddhist theory of IR offers a means for transcending the Westphalian predicament. This chapter situates a Buddhist approach to international relations within the sweep of traditional and recent international relations theory. It then outlines the subsequent chapters of the monograph that address the philosophical foundations of Buddhist IR; Buddha’s ideas about politics, economics, and statecraft; and the manifestations of Buddhist political principles in practice, one ancient and one modern, that illustrate this alternative approach.]
Published: Feb 16, 2021
Keywords: Buddhism; Politics; International relations theory
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.