Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Lewis examines the concept of credibility in scientific processes using examples of practising science during her PhD research. The scientific method provides scientists with a formalised approach to the generation of credible scientific knowledge. However, by drawing on personal experiences of scientific research, Lewis reveals a chasm between the subjective practice of science—so-called messy methods—and the sanitised version of methods in published works. Lewis explores contemporary social theory to described science as a nuanced, complex and messy process. Lewis proposes that such so-called mess, must be contained in published scientific works, including through the reporting of null results and the explicit description of scientific methods employed.]
Published: Apr 12, 2017
Keywords: Palaeoclimate; Credibility; Messy methods; Null result; File drawer problem
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.