Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Lewis explores the importance of curiosity as a key aspect of scientific practice. By exploring a case study of palaeoclimate research and examples of the dark outcomes of scientific research, Lewis demonstrates the limitations of a utilitarian framing of research. Such a problem-solution approach to scientific inquiry denies the essence of science as an experimental, uncertain and curious mode of producing knowledge. Lewis argues that scientists should also view science as a fundamental creative process that requires curiosity. Hence, curiosity and transparency are presented as counterpoints in scientific practice. By employing both as key elements of scientific practice, scientists can both attend to the critical relationship between science and society, and develop a deeper and richer connection to the world.]
Published: Apr 12, 2017
Keywords: Curiosity; Transparency; Palaeoclimate; Value; Useless knowledge; Problems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.