Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Lewis presents new descriptors for scientific practice. By juxtaposing two disparate views of what it is to be a scientist and what it means to apply scientific methods, Lewis questions objectivity as core tenet of science. Lewis contrasts her own reflexive science with a colleague’s deeply held belief that objectivity is essential. Next, Lewis provides a broader discussion of recent climate science controversies, and the role of scientists in policy and decision-making. Lewis argues that the expectations of science are changing and a greater transparency of practice is required in response. Lewis proposes the idea of the hinterland, a new conceptual terrain in which scientists can acknowledge the culture, beliefs and practice of science with greater transparency.]
Published: Apr 12, 2017
Keywords: Objectivity; Transparency; Post-normal science; Blogging; Conceptual hinterland
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.