Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Ager, N. Boothby, M. Wessells (2007)
The use of consensus methodology in determining key research and practice: development questions in the field of intervention with children associated with fighting forcesIntervention, 5
Lewis Ma, Lockheed Me (2007)
Getting all girls into school.finance and development, 44
B. Rugh (2000)
Home-based girls’ schools in Balochistan refugee villages : a strategy study / Andrea B. [Quetta?, Pakistan] : Pakistan/Afghanistan Field
A. Ager, N. Boothby, Megan Bremer (2009)
Using the 'protective environment' framework to analyse children's protection needs in Darfur.Disasters, 33 4
Karin Landgren (2005)
The Protective Environment: Development Support for Child ProtectionHuman Rights Quarterly, 27
D. Paul (1999)
Protection in Practice: Field-Level Strategies for Protecting Civilians from Deliberate Harm RRN
A. Ager, L. Stark, Bree Akesson, N. Boothby (2010)
Defining best practice in care and protection of children in crisis-affected settings: a Delphi study.Child development, 81 4
L. Stark, L. Roberts, W. Wheaton, A. Acham, N. Boothby, A. Ager (2009)
Measuring violence against women amidst war and displacement in northern Uganda using the “neighbourhood method”Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64
[Creating a protective environment is the basis of the United Nations’ strategy for protecting the human rights of children faced with the extreme environmental threats posed by disasters and war. The “Protective Environment Framework” was developed as a basis to identify the key areas, where actions can be taken to increase the protection available to children (Landgren, 2005). It is a basis for thinking with appropriate breadth of potential influences on children’s well-being, but with sufficient focus to frame clear actions that will promote protection. There are eight identified features of the “protective environment” which together can be seen to form a potential protective “shield” around children – not eliminating risks and vulnerabilities, but creating protection from their full impact. These include: government commitment and capacity; legislation and enforcement; culture and customs; open discussion; children’s life skills, knowledge, and participation; capacity of families and communities; essential services; and monitoring, reporting, and oversight. We believe that all these features can be strengthened, and changes measured, through targeted support of international and national actors.]
Published: Aug 28, 2010
Keywords: Domestic Violence; Child Labor; Corporal Punishment; Armed Conflict; Child Protection
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.