Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Individual states increasingly rely upon economic sanctions and sanctions with extraterritorial effects to achieve their foreign policy goals. However, the proliferation of economic sanctions, especially trade control, limits free trade between WTO members and targeted states, which urges them to question WTO consistency. For the WTO, the principal concern is sanction overreach and determining the legality of related trade measures under the WTO framework. Against this backdrop, this article analyses two potential justifications for trade control: invoking Article XX and Article XXI of the GATT 1994. The subsequent analysis focuses on the WTO consistency of the Anti-foreign Sanctions Law of the People’s Republic of China, particularly state practices, possible violations of WTO rules and invocation of the national security exception clause. Additionally, from the perspective of WTO rules, suggestions for the improvement of China’s anti-foreign sanctions regime are put forward. The conclusion emphasizes that the GATT exception cannot be used to justify all types of anti-foreign sanctions.]
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Economic sanctions; Anti-foreign sanctions; WTO; GATT exception; National security exception
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.