Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[How, where and who reports back on communal activities in academia matters. The reader might expect there to be writing about the academic reading group’s discussion, (of who said what) followed by a discussion about consensus and cooperation. Instead, the debate is circumnavigated so as to discuss the events’ atmosphere ethics as related to Spheres. Atmosphere ethics is intertwined with a feminist ethics of ambiguity and situationsethicsof situations. I give an account of participant consent and three schisms resulting in non-consent. The social, digital and technical schisms are tied to the spatial setting of where the roundtable took place at the Royal Society of the ArtsRoyal Society of the Arts (RSA) (RSA), London, and then how it was captured in an audio recording and data processed at the point of digital transcription. The digital design-indesign-in is to suggest that consent is always a matter of continual re-consent. ]
Published: Dec 13, 2018
Keywords: Ambiguity; Atmosphere; Ethics; Reading; Re-consent; Transcription
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.