Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[Paul Smeyers argues convincingly that ‘educational research should be seen as a performative intervention’: in effect, as a move in a language game. This chapter explores some of the controversial implications of this position, construing it as contributing to a broader philosophical debate about realist and relativist orientations in educational research that raises many issues about research, policy and practice. The challenge for the relativist is to articulate a set of criteria for arbitrating between incommensurable positions. Smeyers, drawing on the later Wittgenstein, adopts the concept of the language game, but does not consider (other than in passing) the radical implications of its deployment in the postmodern literature, most notably by Jean-François Lyotard. Smeyers also (perhaps for lack of space) employs an unproblematised conception of causation to progress his argument. It is suggested that the consequences of fully embracing Wittgenstein and/or Lyotard in educational research would be far reaching, involving more than the embracing of an interpretive paradigm as commonly construed.]
Published: Aug 16, 2013
Keywords: Interpretive research; Smeyers; Wittgenstein; Lyotard; Relativism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.