Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
[One of the more salient challenges facing teacher educators and curriculum leaders in schools is how to assist beginning teachers to link their academic studies with professional practice knowledge. Solutions from within the university frequently emphasise links between theory and practice through university based tasks requiring pre-service teachers (teacher candidates) to trial an idea in the classroom and report back in university classes. This approach can be seen as intrusive by classroom teachers or as decontextualised by teacher candidates and students in schools. On occasions, teacher candidates have reported complaints about this approach, as well as feeling the need to “take sides” in a perceived debate between academic studies and professional practice knowledge; however, the relationship between the two is more nuanced, complex, and multidimensional than a simple theory practice divide might suggest. In this chapter, we review literature that examines the complex and multidimensional nature of the challenge of linking academic studies with professional practice learning both in schools and within the university. This provides a context for our discussion of an innovative pedagogical and assessment practice, the Clinical Praxis Exam (CPE), which is a key feature of all Master of Teaching programs at the Melbourne Graduate School of Education. The CPE is described and the theoretical basis for the innovation is outlined. Particular attention is paid to the way in which the content of each CPE is drawn from the classroom practice of individual teacher candidates and their negotiations with students, mentor teachers, and school based university staff. The chapter then outlines responses from teacher candidates, mentor teachers, teaching fellows and university teachers who participated in two qualitative research projects examining the efficacy and impact of the CPE. Findings are then summarised and the next steps in the on-going refinement of the CPE are outlined.]
Published: May 3, 2017
Keywords: Teacher Education; Teacher Education Programme; Clinical Specialist; Teacher Candidate; Academic Study
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.