Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Conspiracy Against ObamacareArgument

A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: Argument [On Monday, March 26, oral arguments began in NFIB v. Sebelius. The allotted time had been extended from an already unprecedented five-and-a-half hours to six. First up was the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), for which the Court appointed a lawyer, Robert A. Long, to argue that the AIA barred all challenges to the mandate (the Court occasionally appoints lawyers to give arguments that neither party is willing to give).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/a-conspiracy-against-obamacare-argument-hSHlsMThgf

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Copyright
© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013
ISBN
978-1-137-36374-9
Pages
179 –220
DOI
10.1057/9781137363732_8
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[On Monday, March 26, oral arguments began in NFIB v. Sebelius. The allotted time had been extended from an already unprecedented five-and-a-half hours to six. First up was the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), for which the Court appointed a lawyer, Robert A. Long, to argue that the AIA barred all challenges to the mandate (the Court occasionally appoints lawyers to give arguments that neither party is willing to give).]

Published: Oct 15, 2015

Keywords: Collective Action Problem; Medicaid Expansion; Judicial Activism; Actuarial Risk; Federal Power

There are no references for this article.