Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Gram-hanssen (2010)
Residential heat comfort practices: understanding usersBuilding Research & Information, 38
R. Galvin (2011)
Discourse and materiality in environmental policy : the case of German federal policy on thermal renovation of existing homes
Thomas Boermans, K. Bettgenhäuser, Andreas Hermelink, S. Schimschar (2011)
Cost optimal building performance r equirements Calculation methodology for reporting on national energy performance requirements on the basis of cost optimality within the framework of the EPBD
E. Shove (2010)
Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social ChangeEnvironment and Planning A, 42
E. Schumacher (1973)
Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered
R. Galvin (2013)
Impediments to energy-efficient ventilation of German dwellings: A case study in AachenEnergy and Buildings, 56
Tom Hargreaves, M. Nye, J. Burgess (2010)
Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitorsEnergy Policy, 38
[Germany has engaged better-off homeowners in advanced thermal retrofits to high standards. However, at this level retrofits are inherently economically inefficient, and empirical research shows they often bring significantly smaller savings than calculated. This ‘top-end’ approach also fails to engage the bulk of homeowners, due to severe technical and economic difficulties of retrofitting to the required level. In order to increase the annual retrofit rate and energy savings, we propose a broadening out of policy into three distinct streams, simultaneously promoting: cost-effective thermal upgrade measures, which would not necessarily meet current, stringent EnEV standards; user behavior change, which appears to have a very large saving potential that is already beginning to be realized; and top-end thermal retrofits which may not be economically viable but could be promoted for their environmental and comfort benefits. To put this three-stream CUT model into place would require institutional change, and also a significant shift in attitude among policymakers. They would have to accept the value of modest thermal upgrade measures, and of the contribution of behavior change, rather than remain narrowly focused on the extreme end of technological capability. Notions of ‘economic viability’ would also need to be overhauled.]
Published: Jul 26, 2013
Keywords: Retrofits; Thermal regulations; German policy; Economic viability; Energy use behavior
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.